Third time's the charm
ᵇˡᵃᶜᵏᵖⁱˡˡᵉᵈ-ᵐᵒᵈᵉʳⁿʷᵃˢᵗᵉ
ᶠʳᵃᵍⁱˡᵉʸᵒᵘⁿᵍᵐⁱⁿᵈ
now a fragileyoungman.
This is a blog for my pathetic & retarded posts.
trying on a metaphor
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Three Goblin Art

Discoholic 🪩
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Cosimo Galluzzi
RMH

★
NASA
cherry valley forever
Claire Keane
Cosmic Funnies

ellievsbear
tumblr dot com
Sade Olutola
Xuebing Du
i don't do bad sauce passes
Sweet Seals For You, Always
styofa doing anything
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from T1

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Japan
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
@fragileyoungman
Third time's the charm
ᵇˡᵃᶜᵏᵖⁱˡˡᵉᵈ-ᵐᵒᵈᵉʳⁿʷᵃˢᵗᵉ
ᶠʳᵃᵍⁱˡᵉʸᵒᵘⁿᵍᵐⁱⁿᵈ
now a fragileyoungman.
This is a blog for my pathetic & retarded posts.
There is no third position between victim and perpetrator in the blackpill. Normies benefit directly from the suffering of incels, too.
The 'femcel' variants of incelspeak (e.g, fog, moid) don't hold as much weight as their original counterparts because they are not conceived out of animosity, they're stolen vocabulary modified out of spite towards incels.
wasn't the term 'incel' coined by woman first tho?
Yes, and males built the culture around it.
This is what women think of incels, they group incels with other misogynist groups (not implying that incelism isn't misogynistic) and use that as a 'gotcha' moment. These other misogynist groups consist of redpillers, podcastbros, and PUAs.
These women think that incels are the same people as the redpillers that have success in dating, they complain about the standards of the men they are physically attracted to—while ignoring the rest of the male population they deem 'lower' than what they 'deserve'.
Once again, I am repeating myself. There are men who would be willing to fuck you no matter how ugly you are as a woman, these 'female standards' they have listed are fabricated—If not, then these are the standards of a porn addict (who I'm sure you do not want to be dating.)
Again, don't take any 'former incel' advice seriously, his entire account—much like mine—is just him venting out his mental anguish.
"Men used to go to war"
Nigga there is no honor in being blown up by a drone
do the colors on my profile look pleasing to the eyes?
I don't agree with Andrew Tate but this is what I meant when I said that normies cannot fathom a man recognizing the aesthetic appeal of a fellow male without making it gay.
The 'femcel' variants of incelspeak (e.g, fog, moid) don't hold as much weight as their original counterparts because they are not conceived out of animosity, they're stolen vocabulary modified out of spite towards incels.
All of those former-incel arguments go out the window once you realize that most people you meet in real life don't even think that deeply when it comes to their social life. They never encounter long-term social problems that incels do because life flows normally for them with a few minor inconveniences here and there.
In fact, former-incel was never even an incel. His 'incel years' took place not during his adult life, but during his awkward teenage years.
There's a reason why even the worst cesspit shithole (incels.is) limits account creation to people who are >21.
I am once again reminded that normies are retarded slaves by nature
paying for a video call with a findom and then blowing your brains out in front of them
Instead of looking like Ryan Gosling with my crooked eyes, I look even more inhuman and retarded.
The 'just-world fallacy' is an argument that normies use to justify your social failure, it has existed for as long as anybody can remember. Most normies refuse to comprehend anything further than the surface of ethical values, yet they spread these values to other people—losing nuance in the process, resulting in the just-world fallacy.
The 'just-world' is an unspoken belief held across many cultures and religions, despite many differences in faith, these religions also hold one common belief: 'Justice'.
People believe that each negative action is accompanied by an equally terrible consequence—but normies don't want to waste time justifying the disproportionate punishment toward those who end up unfortunate without having done anything deserving, so they resort to the easiest explanation possible: You get what you deserve, comply or receive further punishment.
The just-world phenomenon takes all these beliefs which are fitted for different environments and condenses them into a single, 'acceptable' monocultural belief.
In other words, fuck you water is wet.
It doesn't matter if you have a recessed skull as a female, most males would still fuck you. Females are inherently valuable because of their life-giving wombs, whereas males have to work their way up the social ranks like sisyphus—even then—the results would still be disappointing. Males do all the bullshit that bluepilled simps tell them to do just to try and woo a female that refuses to evolve past her primal instincts.
I genuinely think that these fem'cels' deserve to be ostracized from subcultures that revolve around the male experience.
i need to OWN a FIREARM for SELF-DEFENSE and NOTHING ELSE.