Sooo you're just here {to troll}. Disappointing. Thought being a good person meant giving a shit and doing actual good in the world but fuck me for having standards, am I right?! đ
Still though, despite you taking a thorough piss with this, I actually want to treat this situation seriously and so, I'll be making another post about you. đ If you unblock me again and respond, I will respond again then block you if you don't bring anything meaningful to the discussion. These posts will still be visible in your tag despite the block so good luck hiding them from other people.
As for not being able to come up with answers: I already did. If you had reading comprehension or actually gave a shit about this topic, you'd see that the answers are within the questions themselves. The problem with these answers is that they're currently ineffectual.
Even with crowd funding, we (as everyday people) can't afford lobbyists to make laws. We can vote things in at the state level, but you need to have the majority on your side and those laws can be overruled federally, if not outright removed by the Supreme Court, which has been rigged to be as anti-citizen as possible. Even if we were to luck out with all or even most of that, our current process just takes way too effing long. People shouldn't have to die for 10+ years before change can be enacted.
In 2010, the Canadian government made it illegal for any groups, larger than five, to congregate in public places wearing masks, after a bunch of masked teens destroyed some shops downtown in protest of the G10 summit. This law was immediate and rushed into law within 48hrs of the event taking place so don't tell me it's going to take ten fucking years to make these laws happen.
We need the American government to do the same but with insurance companies. I know that's a hell of a pipe dream given the dictator the royal you elected, dumbass, but maybe if they fear swinging in the breeze from a high tree, they'll do the smart thing and give into people's demands. (I doubt it, but you can't deny they're at least motivated to listen now.)
Always remember, we women had to kill to get the vote.
Oh I don't think it's because of your political stances, dear. Your behavior led me to that assumption.
What in the red-headed feminist???? Bitch, I'm leftist. I'm assuming this is your attempt to derail the conversation because I did not mention him or anything other than the current hot button topic that's got you all frazzled for some reason. (Afraid of ending up in the crosshairs someday? I'm queer, I live under its gaze. Did you just notice it?)
This might surprise you, but I think Zimmerman should be taken out back for what he did to Trevor. He shouldn't have gotten away with it and he totally abused his white-passing privilege to get away with it. (Annoying & disheartening how the internet's forgotten about him; man should be dogged for the rest of his days, but I digress.)
Despite what you think of me, I'm not a violent sociopath. I actually look for the peaceful solution 99% of the time. The 1% where I don't is reserved for evil, disgusting people who actively hurt others, like the CEO.
No, I don't want all CEO's dead and him just being a CEO isn't the problem; it's what he did and didn't do as CEO that got him in the literal crosshairs. Again, he was no wee-babe, but a cowardly bastard, arbitrarily killing people so he could pad his own pockets as well as the shareholders. He made $10,000,000 a year and did dick all with it so it's not even like he tried to atone.
You know what sensible people call those? Murderers. Why does this need to be explained to you? Everyone considers insurance companies and the people who run them as evil thieves, parasites and legalized killers, but it was accepted as a "necessary evil." It never should've become that normalized; you should not be on his side in this (and despite your other posts, you most definitely are.) You've also failed to realize...
HE THOUGHT MURDER WAS OKAY
And what's frightening is that you seem to think it's fine for him to think/do so.
No, as an insurer, he has a duty to pay out to people who pay in; not leave it up to a broken AI he didn't feel the need to take any accountability for. He actively pushed a faulty, defective product and did nothing to correct all of it's wrongful rejections. He failed as a CEO, as the head/face of the company and actively murdered people. To kill for your own needs/profit is inherently selfish and unjustifiable, but he's allowed to get away with it because�
Are you some rich white girl or did you really hit the curb when your mother dropped you?
If it isn't, then where the hell are you getting this from? The only one who sounds hateful/frothing right now is you and you're clearly allowing previous biases to cloud your judgement.
For the record, I am NOT:
Pro-guns
Pro-gun violence
Pro-murdering of anyone/everyone
Right leaning (like, at all)
Straight
I am 100% in favor of:
Abortion & abortion rights
Proper sex education & preventatives
Gun control & sanity checks for gun ownership
Protecting yourself/your home from an attacker
Physically defending yourself if touched without consent (in any context)
Attacking an abuser or assailant that's blocking you from leaving a bad situation
Pro defense & murder when it comes to the "your body, my choice" crowd and for men who've killed in the dozens to thousands...
...which this CEO has.
Understand, my position isn't ill-thought out nor haphazard like you're wanting it to be. The right to kill should only be reserved for the most extreme/dire of circumstances, (like killing thousands.) Zimmerman was a coward who started shit and, unjustly, got to end it. What he did wasn't self-defense and IDK how his testimony to starting the conflict didn't void that entirely.
No one's life is worth a fucking chocolate bar.
But he was a small man with small goals. A problem, yes, but we're talking about a murderous CEO who sat in a chair and reaped profit from the dead. He's a mass murderer that's tricked society into thinking it's legal/just because of his title. It isn't. It's murder, 100% and we need to do something about it. Also, just because something's legal, doesn't mean it's just. A lot of laws need to change sooner rather than later but it's looking like the system you're so very dependent on is collapsing. Have fun with that. đ
Yeah because you totally haven't been unblocking and re-blocking me to try and "win" this thing. I doubt the follow was accidental since you were still following by the time of my latest response.
What block circumvention? You're in my notifs:
Maybe stop unblocking me and it'll stick? Also, making posts about you in my own blog isn't considered block evasion if I can see and click on the notifications. Again, if you want this to stop, either have an actual discussion or keep me blocked. Any response from you will be seen and responded to.
Promise? Also, stop projecting. You're the one who actually needs to prove they're doing more than just trolling.
