"blah blah"

on a good day i might manage a *thought* but most days it's just "blah blah blah"

[woman-becomer]

*kisses ur forehead*

*I absorb and consume one precious memory*

[donuteater13]

*forgets that you kissed my forehead*

[pomrania]

Major human pastimes:

frying dough

classifying things and then arguing about the classifications

[tinierpurplefishes]

arguing about classifications of fried dough

[ishowdespair-deactivated2026012]

[importantdogimages]

[dark-magician-girl-meets-world]

One of the machines broke down at the hyperbole factory. The situation is frustrating, but ultimately manageable.

[dark-magician-girl-meets-world]

It just started working again! This is the best day ever!

[lolathelooptyloop]

idc what ur show's about, give me a feral traumatized little girl and her reluctant, even more traumatized middle-aged father figure and imma eat that shit up

[kisxmesoft]

[susiephone]

Last Week Tonight With John Oliver, 11x14

[mutationgirl]

girl who can only make comparisons to birds: so when you think about it, it’s kind of like a big duck.

girl who really really really wants to hit: i never thought about a car in that way before

[dead-core]

i just need to have more rules for myself. more rules and limits. surely that will help me

[important-animal-images]

[charlesoberonn]

I’m really into internet discourse but only pointless and stupid internet discourse like how many holes there are in a straw (it’s 2)

[charlesoberonn]

This is exactly what I’m talking about.

[evilscientist3]

I’m sorry but mathematically speaking this question has a single objectively correct answer, which is 1 hole. This can be very simply proven; a straw and a torus are homotopic, and a torus has one hole.

[thyrell]

i odnt think thats true one of my friends is a taurus and hes fine with gay people

[depsidase]

[demiboydemon]

[ageofimprisonmentcountup]

699 Days since Tears of the Kingdom Released.

[specialagentartemis]

There’s also a thing that people who think they’re being accepting do where they go “Not wanting romance is SO SAD AND LONELY! Not wanting to read romance novels is SEXIST! Not wanting a partner makes you a FREAK! Not having sex with your partner is BAD and ABUSIVE! Not feeling sexual attraction to your partner means there is SOMETHING WRONG WITH YOU!… unless you’re aromantic or asexual, of course! Then you get a pass.” The only acceptable reason to deviate from the amatonormative and sexnormative societal norm is to claim an identity label that exempts you. The actual thing you’re doing is still bad… but don’t worry it’s OK for you to do it! It feels like, we haven’t actually challenged any norms at all, you just get a pass on them because you can’t help it, poor thing. If you have the capacity to feel these, you have the obligation to; you are only exempt if you claim an identity that says that you are unable to. It implies that we would if we could, but we can’t, and it’s merely unfair to punish us for our shortcomings. Romance and sex are still social requirements, that hasn’t changed, we just are allowed a pass on it because we are unable to meet them. (And we’re still expected to reassure everyone that of course we recognize that their romance and sex is far more important than anything we will ever be able to have!)

I don’t want aros and aces to get special exemption from the requirement to have romance and sex and romantic attraction and sexual attraction; I want that to not be a requirement for anyone.

[aiboumatsu]

WHAT

[thedogopera]

[dankxsinatra]