
ellievsbear

izzy's playlists!
official daine visual archive
noise dept.

gracie abrams
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

#extradirty
The Stonewall Inn
NASA
Claire Keane
untitled
Monterey Bay Aquarium

if i look back, i am lost
Mike Driver

@theartofmadeline

No title available
almost home
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸
trying on a metaphor

pixel skylines

seen from Netherlands

seen from Serbia
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Belarus

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Canada

seen from Taiwan

seen from United States
seen from Spain

seen from Brazil

seen from Canada
seen from South Africa

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from Brazil
@genderspatial
Just saw this post on my dash and because the person who made it blocked me. Iâll answer here. Their post: âLiterally never gonna forgot the trans man that gave a speech at a womenâs college about how he doesnât yet have male privilege while he was the student body president. So you know a man so happened to rise politically to president had nothing to do with gender.â In American, 4 trans people have been elected into office. 4/4 of them were trans women or non-binary DMAB people. In the rest of the world, 19 trans people have been elected. 19/19 of them were DMAB. Trans women elected to office: 23 Trans men: 0 No trans men have been elected. None.Â
trans men are women and face misogyny. this is why they are included in radical feminism. trans women are men. they, as the oppressor class, will never belong here
This twit was debunked long ago by simple google searches.
Youâll find trans men excelling in all areas including politics.
OP is a cryptoterf btw, look at their following on their new acc
If Iâm crypto, what the fuck is your bar for full terf lol
Moving blogs
Hey everyone, yeah Iâve had a long hiatus. Iâm not exactly coming back here but I moved over to a new blog. Wanted a fresh start. If you have any questions. Feel free to send them to the new blog. Keeping genderspatial online but abandoned. I know a lot of you use my /ref pages and come here for resources. To the person who sent me an anon two weeks ago telling me to hang myself. I find it hilarious that you sent that to a blog that hasnât had a new post in over a year.
Recourse to assigned sex at birth is always already a constitutively reactionary movement; admitting otherwise, in any scenario, is to violently impose an illusory coherence on a pure multiplicity of experiences. The suggestion that âAMABâ, on any level, constitutes a coherent category or coherent set of experiences, a) formally equates trans women and transfem nonbinary people with men and b) essentializes a relationship to the gender apparatus as pre-discursive.
How could âassignmentâ be pre-discursive? That makes no sense.
OP, please, at least make your language a little more accessible because currently itâs extremely difficult to understand. Every time I reread it, I just get more confused.Â
Didnât realize until just there that there was a lot of controversy surrounding this figure of the character Aoba from Dramatical Murder.Â
Seriously, whatâs fucking ridiculous about the controversy is that there has never been drama, to my knowledge, of figures of female characters being in similar positions. Ever. This is the first 18+ male anime figure released by Native and male figures, even SFW ones, are few and far between. However there are countless female figures, including BDSM figures, including figures where the character is terrified, including figures where the character was under 18, including undress-able figures of children.Â
Yet not even a tiny bit of controversy over the creation of those figures. Even the creation of those figures by the same bloody company.Â
If you want to boycott Native over the figure. Then boycott the majority of anime figure companies for making sexualized figures of children.Â
Why do you preemptively block all truscum users?
I donât. I am truscum? If Iâve been bothered enough to properly block you, youâve probably done something really fucked up.Â
But it may have been a mistake, so if you can send me your URL, Iâll check if youâre blocked. But I certainly donât pre-emptively block truscum bloggers.
Like, if you were to tell someone they were being transphobic for invalidating a trans person's gender and purposely misgendering them and they were like "Biology is biology I'm not being transphobic it is fact"
âBiological sex is irrelevant here. Youâre being a dickhead. Just use the pronouns they ask. It does nothing to be nice to someone else. It upsets them when you use the wrong pronouns, stop upsetting people on purpose cause youâre too lazy to make an effort.âIâd also explain how dysphoria feels and explain that misgendering the person makes them feel that. That it isnât a victimless crime or just someone being irrationally angry.Â
legalizing prostitution in parts of australia INCREASED human trafficking in the country so fkn quit glorifying rapeÂ
but the great majority of sex workers want it so ?? đ¤đ¤
90% of women in prostitution donât want to be there
and even if that wasnât the case, youâre literally defending trafficking? youâre a fucking monster???? i canât believe u just typed that bc prostituted women want it legalized then who cares about trafficked women? like yeah who cares about the black and brown children being stolen and funneled into white countries and sold for sex? who cares????? bc some white âsex workersâ want prostitution legalized who careS?????? fuck you
Did you just get your information from an opinion piece? From a centre-right paper? I mean, I guess itâs possible for a paper with that leaning to report the news, but this isnât news. Itâs an opinion piece. Itâs likely to skew information to fit the authorâs beliefs. When getting facts from an opinion piece, I recommend sourcing the original study or a news report rather than an opinion piece.
â¨Now, onto the substance. There are many different aspects of legalising prositution, because you canât just legalise it; you have to regulate it. If you legalise it, you need to protect the prostitutes by making contraceptives and STI tests mandatory. Criminalising prostitution means that this would go away and infections and unwanted pregnancy would skyrocket. An example is in the Unites States, where prositution is illegal in most states and many sex workers have refused to use condoms on themselves or their partners because they donât want evidence in a court of law. Compare that to Germany, which has planned laws to protect prostitutes including counselling. http://www.dw.com/en/germany-plans-new-law-to-protect-prostitutes/a-19020747
The service of sex is similar to alcohol in that banning it brings the problem underground, and when itâs underground it canât be regulated to protect the safety of the workers. Pimps can have more control over prostitutes and can commit other crimes as hey, itâs illegal anyway, so whatâs going to stop a criminal from doing false advertising or not creating a safe environment for their workers? Whatâs to stop them from abusing sex workers when those workers canât come forward without risking a jail sentence?
â¨Is trafficking wrong? Definitely. Is a rise in trafficking also alarming? Of course. I think the person who replied was insensitive. But I would be interested to know how legalising prostitution led to trafficking when customers have a safer option. Itâs like buying car repair from a shady repairer who may not fix the car as opposed to someone legal and professional. It doesnât make any sense.Â
â¨As you said, often people of colour are stolen and taken to white people. So perhaps thereâs a reason for the spike related to the fact that sex work is illegal in other countries. You know how in Chicago gun regulation has not decreased gun crime? Well thatâs because itâs surrounded by other states who did not regulate as heavily. Perhaps the fact that sex work is not legal in other countries contributed to this spike.
Or it could be another issue related to the races of the people being trafficked, as I have heard of no such issue with traffick increasing in places like Germany, where sex work is legal. In fact, the argument that legalising sex work will not decrease trafficking because the latter is cheaper would not make sense as Germanyâs biggest problem related to sex work is itâs cheapness due to a saturation of the market. http://business.time.com/2013/06/18/germany-has-become-the-cut-rate-prostitution-capital-of-the-world/#ixzz2X4nt3vlX
You want rid the world of sex trafficking? Convince other countries to have it legalised in all countries so that people from foreign nations have less incentive to kidnap or coerce innocent people. Sex workers can then be treated not as objects or property but as service industry workers worthy of basic respect. I hope that in the future sex work will be just like working in retail or at McDonalds- not the job people necessarily want to be in but have to for financial reasons. Sex workers should be protected under Occupational Health and Safety.
And that doesnât even get into the ludicrous manner in which people try to inhibit biological urges that many people (yes, I know that asexuals exist) have. Some people are unable to find a partner or have specific fetishes that they feel uncomfortable sharing with potential partners. Some people are old or disabled and struggle to have a sexual connection with the average person. Did you forget about people who need sex work but have a moral compass and wonât participate in trafficking?
I also find it hilarious that in the United States and Japan some sexual services are legal such as porn and compensated dating, but take out the camera and the fake romance and you get a âhorrible crimeâ.
I want to get rid of sex trafficking, but criminalising something like sex work can in some cases make the problem worse. Am example is marijuana, whose criminalisation led to cartels having a monopoly on it. The same goes for alcohol and the mafia. Sex work is the oldest profession and is innate to not only humans but other primates. http://www.zmescience.com/research/how-scientists-tught-monkeys-the-concept-of-money-not-long-after-the-first-prostitute-monkey-appeared/
The studies you presented were damning, but I want to know exactly why those results are the way they are. Why are some countries fairly successful in their sex industries but others not? Criminalising sex work will stop sex workers from bringing a harassment or abuse case against their bosses or clients. Perhaps we as a world should work on the problems faced by many sex workers such as coercion and poverty instead of banning it altogether, which would harm the consenting prostitutes who either love their job or at least feel safe even if they donât like the job (you know, just like other jobs such as fast food workers, teachers and salespeople).
here we go, another rape apologist.Â
in australia, even though prostitution is legal in many parts of my country, 40% of men using this ~~~~service (barf) DO NOT WEAR CONDOMS in the act [x]
there 400 illegal brothels in Victoria, Australia, which is more than double the legal ones but WOO LEGALISATION WOO uwu uwu [x]
even tho prostitution was legalised in 1984 in victoria, illegal prostitution and police corruption, harm to women and street prostitution has gotten worse [x]
citizens are forced to have brothels in their street - so while creepy men go in to rape a woman their little girls are riding their bikes in the street. hmm safe uwu [x]
â In 1984, a Labor government in the Australian State of Victoria introduced legislation to legalize prostitution in brothels. Subsequent Australian governments expanded legalization culminating in the Prostitution Control Act of 1994. Noting the link between legalization of prostitution and trafficking in Australia, the US Department of State observed: âTrafficking in East Asian women for the sex trade is a growing problemâŚlax laws â including legalized prostitution in parts of the country â make [antitrafficking] enforcement difficult at the working levelâ (U.S. Department of State, 2000, p. 6F)â  - the trafficking as a result of legalization isnât something new so whatever you say from here on out is pro-rape i donât want to discuss anything more with someone like you when the evidence shown to you explicitly depicted the rise in trafficking as a result of legalisation, and the abundance of other issues it causes. not only that, but simply paying someone for sex in itself is a coercive tool and we all know coercive sex is rape. prostitution itself is rape. goodday.Â
Iâm literally from Victoria and have repeated tried to explain how trafficked women are frequently put to work in legitimate brothels right beside those who âchoseâ to be there. Most of the places Iâve worked, Iâve worked alongside trafficked women; particularly East Asian women. But nah cool, tell me again how this being legal makes all the problems go away uwu
Hello my name is Reana and I have less than 24 hours to raise $250 for my abortion. Everything that could have gone wrong this week has. I know a lot of people disagree with abortions but I am an unemployed freshman in college and Iâve made a decision. I would appreciate anything you could donate. Thank you in advance. gofundme.com/cnyb3kxx
Boost!!!
Please help!!! All help is appreciated
This has over 200 notes and NO ONE has donated!! How is that possible?? Iâm aware some people donât have the means but how bout sacrifice your $4 latte or $7 burrito or $2 nail polish or even $1 that youâd spend on a Coke and donate it to her! We all seem to have money to buy little unimportant stuff but somehow NO ONE who reblogged this felt they could spare a buck?! Wtf
I was but she deleted it it looks like
GoFundMe shut my page down because they said Iâm not suppose to get donations for an abortion. Thank you for trying to support me I appreciate you!
????? what the fuck
If anyone would still like to donate Iâve created a paypal paypal.me/ReanaFund
When someone invalidates transness using "biology," what would you say?
What exactly do you mean? Like give me an example?Â
Your persistence is admirable tumblr but even with this godawfully ugly update i can still edit john greens posts. So once again. suck my dick
Where your gag comes from.
(TW: sexualized racism + misogyny, slavery) Discretion is highly advised.
Apparently, for some people (usually white in my experience), itâs difficult for them to comprehend the perspective that BDSM kink culture is neck-deep in racism and misogyny, particularly in the sexualization of racist-misogynistic historical practices. Itâs become quite clear to me over months of pointing out the eerie similarities between the master/slave dynamic thatâs common place in bondage subculture and the master/slave dynamic that was quite vividly practiced through patriarchal gender roles between men and women, as well as slaveryâŚthat many people struggle with being able to draw parallels between the techniques of torture slaves were subjected to and the methods of punishment âsubsâ are subjected to in kink culture. From the whipping to the gags.
Itâs been communicated to me, based on the hesitant and confused reception of this argument, that Iâm going to need to get visual. This post will include illustrations and imagery that may be potentially disturbing to some viewers, as well as triggering to people who feel mentally disarmed by images of black slavery and female oppression. This will not be my final post on the topic, but it will be an introduction to much larger, much more elaborate posts addressing the racist-patriarchal narratives usually replicated in kink culture (this does not exclude femdom kink practices, which Iâll be writing about in future posts).
Iâll first like to point out the gag. A torture device used to stop, âNegro Heads, with punishments for Intoxication and dirt-eating.â
[Slave Mask: Image Reference, NW0191. Source:Jacques Arago, Souvenirs dâun aveugle. Voyage autour du monde par M. J. Arago ⌠(Paris, 1839-40), vol. 1, facing p. 119]
While the tin collarâŚ
[Slave Mask Image Reference, NW0192. Source: Thomas Branagan, The Penitential Tyrant; or, slave trader reformed (New York, 1807), p. 271. (Copy in Library Company of Philadelphia; also Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division, LC-USZ62-31864)]
âŚwas used to punish âdrunkenness in females,â and the mask on it functions as a âpunishment and preventative ofâŚ.dirt eating.â
In some cases, along with the gags, ââŚa flat iron goes into the mouth, and so effectually keeps down the tongue, that nothing can be swallowed, not even the saliva, a passage for which is made through holes in the mouth-plateâŚwhen long worn, [it] becomes so heated as frequently to bring off the skin along with it.â - US Slave: Slave Tortures: The Mask, Scoldâs Bridle or Brank.
Hereâs another illustration of a tin mask sometimes used by Brazilian slave masters for reasons documented as to stop, ââŚ[slaves] who were prone to eat earth or dirt to wearâŚâ
[A water color by Jean Baptiste Debret (held by a museum in Rio de Janeiro); published in Ana Maria de Moraes, O Brasil dos viajantes (Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, 1994), image 469, p. 93. Also published in Jean Baptiste Debret, Viagem Pitoresca e Historica ao Brasil (Editora Itatiaia Limitada, Editora da Universidade de Sao Paulo, 1989), p.128, a reprint of the 1954 Paris edition, edited by R. De Castro Maya). (source: University of Virginia)]
-
Torture Devices With A Misogynistic History
A scold was defined as: âA troublesome and angry woman who by brawling and wrangling amongst her neighbours breaks the public peace, increases discord and becomes a public nuisance to the neighbourhood.â The device was a locking iron muzzle, metal mask or cage which encased the head. There was an iron curb projecting into the mouth which rested on the top of the tongue. This device prevented the shrew from speaking. In some instances the iron curb was studded with spikes which inflicted pain if the victim spoke. Some branks had a bell built in which drew attention to the scold as she walked through the streets. The woman would be humiliated by the jeering and comments from other people.
THE SCOLDâS BRIDLE
[Scoldâs Bridle: This was a metal frame place over a womanâs head. It had a bit that stuck in her mouth to prevent her talking. The scoldâs bridle or branks was used in Scotland by the 16th century and was used in England from the 17th century. It was last used in Britain in 1824].
Made by blacksmiths, the bridle was a cage-like device, made from iron. It was approximately nine inches high and seven inches wide, and was fitted to the womanâs head. The most basic type was made of a band of iron, which was hinged at the side and had a protruding part, or tongue piece, that could be flat or with a spike, which went into the womanâs mouth, to hold her tongue down. Another band of iron went over her head, the front of which was shaped for her nose to go through. Depending on the design, the bridle could be uncomfortable, painful or torturous, and scarring of the tongue was not uncommon. Some had a bell secured to a spring, which was attached to the bridle, so the wearer could be heard as she approached.
Some houses had a hook in the wall at the side of the fireplace where the wife would be chained, until she promised to behave herself and curb her tongue. Although sometimes fitted to a nagging wife by the local gaoler (jailer) at the request of her husband, or by the husband himself, it was more often a punitive sentence ordered by a magistrate. Judicial bridles were more elaborate than the basic type; they always had at least one spike and they could be locked. They also had a chain attached to the side of the bridle, with a ring on the end. This could be used to publicly humiliate the woman by leading her through the town, or staking her at a designated area for a set time period. The amount of time the bridle was worn could be from 30 minutes to several hours, depending on the seriousness of the offense, during which time the miscreant would not be able to eat or drink. It was also said to be used on witches to prevent them from chanting or casting spells.
Itâs pretty evident that when some women, especially women of color , argue that BDSM kink culture has an overwhelming amount of racist-misogyny embedded in its practice of reenacting bondage and inequitable dynamics, they have a reasonable argument worth considering. Itâs not difficult to understand the viewpoint that some kinks take things steeped in the actual subordination and oppression of people and turn it into a sexualized drama thatâs just âfun and games,â for the (hopefully consensual) participants involved.
If you are engaged in kinky, consensual sexual activity, your gut-reaction is most likely to defend something youâve learnt to enjoy despite its highly problematic elements. However, the primary intent of this post isnât to persuade you to stop practicing these things, but to come to realize that kink culture is still affected by whiteness and patriarchy while relying on it all the same. Relying on the use of sometimes and somewhat altered methods of torture to be able to act out scenes that induce discomfort and/or pain and to keep within the narrative of unequal power relations and acted abuse.
I'm sorry if I've misread, but how do you feel about borderines who parent?
I wasnât raised by someone with BPD. I donât really know enough to judge. However one of my best friends has BPD and sheâd be an awesome mum.Â
Can someone explain âradfemâ to me? Femininity is bad?
Iâm not an expert, but as far as Iâve observed, radfems are generally sex negative (anti-porn, anti-prostitution), more openly marxist and anti-liberal, generally donât assert that âfeminism means equalityâ and instead support âwomenâs liberationâ which often includes open mysandry. A lot of radfems think femininity was designed to oppress women. I think itâs radfems who are generally more on board with the concept of âgender abolitionâ which is the idea that gender itself is a system of oppression that must be eradicated. Radfems seem to exist on a spectrum of their own ranging from ecoveganspiritualist to marxistlesbianmysandrist. I donât know what the uniting force is between radfems other than influence of specific feminist philosophers. They are also much more into patriarchy theory, even going so far as to capitalize âThe Patriarchyâ, but intersectionalists are known for that as well and intersectionalism overlaps with radical feminism about as much as it does with liberal feminism.
The one thing I noticed with radfems is that they are so misandrist that they are true misogynists.
They claim that any part of femininity is bad from wearing make up, to having children and being a stay at home mother. They see anything that women contribute to society as worthless and instead aim for women to act like men.
To radfems femininity is a weakness and is worthless compared to masculinity, which is exactly how male misogynists think.
I think most feminists have prejudices toward women. They all really hate on women who are not feminists or who are âthe wrong kind of feminists/ not real feministsâ. They have tailor made prejudices against all races and genders who are not feminists. The only feminists who Iâve found arenât generally prejudiced against most people are those who also identify as egalitarian and/or mra.
Iâm a radfem. I donât think that itâs prejudice that they have. Itâs just a lack of empathy. It plagues all groups on the left. Not with us, against us, donât completely agree, youâre the enemy. Itâs bullshit.Â
We should seek to understand our oppressors and our oppression. We should extend empathy to women who disagree and learn from their views.Â
Henci Goer, âCruelty in Maternity Wards: Fifty Years Laterâ
As long as employers feel like they have to tell their female employees to put on more makeup
As long as women feel embarrassed to walk out the house without drawing on eyebrows
As long as womenâs clothes are made uncomfortable, non-functional, and prioritize showing off our figures for the male gaze
As long as female celebrities without makeup smear the tabloids
As long as we spend hundreds/thousands of dollars on makeup and countless hours mastering it and extra time to wake up and apply it
As long as little girls are dieting from the age of 8
As long as women burn themselves to appease a male dominated space because empathy, gracefulness, and mercy are roles assigned to us,
femininity will never be empowering. It started as a tool to oppress and thatâs how it will die. choice feminism isnât getting anyone anywhere.
those employers are sexist, plain and simple
that is due to societal pressure on women to always look their best, which is another form of sexism
again, this could be due to such designersâ inherent sexist views, but it could also be the case that women like to dress in clothes like that simply to look and feel sexy about themselves, and not have it be anything about showing off for the male gaze or anyone, really (also there are plenty of clothes available to women that are functional, comfortable, durable, and not made to show off any figures)
celebrity culture is another topic in and of itself, and it could definitely be argued that sexism against women is ramped up even more there than in every day society Â
there is absolutely nothing wrong with anyone wanting to spend any amount of time and money on perfecting their makeup technique if that is what makes them happy and feel good about themselves (it would be sad if theyâre doing it just for everyone elseâs approval, but that would be something they need to work out themselves)
this is a failure in two parts - one due to society and itâs completely unrealistic expectations, and the other due to those girlsâ upbringingÂ
women who work to appease men and uphold traditional femininity (in the sense that we should be docile, obedient, etc.) have their own issues they need to work out, but it is completely within their right to do whatever they want with their lives (even if that isnât always the best choice for them)
femininity may have started off as a way to oppress women, but it has turned into much more in the recent age
many people (not just women) use it to express themselves, feel confident about themselves, and yes, feel empowered, because guess what?Â
just because something started off one way, doesnât mean it has to stay that way forever (imo thatâs a very jaded view to have)
women who use femininity to empower themselves are essentially sticking up a giant middle finger in the faces of those who would use that same femininity to try and oppress them
does this mean that all women who make use of femininity are now magically un-oppressed? of course not. there are still countless women out there who feel obligated to be traditionally feminine and believe that to be their lot in life, and this is something that we should all be working to counter, because the whole point of feminism is to show women (and everyone else, really) that they can do whatever and be whoever the fuck they want, and that it does not matter what society or other sexists think
my point here is that the problem lies not with femininity or choice feminism, but with sexism, and that we are changing femininity slowly so that instead of oppressing, it empowers us
âOK, letâs say your plane crashes on a desert island, where a mysterious group of Others brings you to a temple. They give you two options: One, you can stay with them and have all your needs met, as long as you wear a little bikini and feed them grapes. If you donât like that, you can go back out into the jungle. Youâll probably survive, but life wonât be easy; youâll be cast out from the only society existing on the island, and youâll miss out on a lot of comforts, and you might get eaten by a polar bear.Â
One castaway, Claire, has genuinely always wanted to wear a tiny bikini and feed people grapes. Sheâs hot, sheâs maternal: itâs perfect. She still doesnât really get to make that choice freely, because itâs the only one available that lets her stay in society - when the options are âcake or death,â it doesnât really matter how much you like cake. But at least she lucked out! Sheâs not just making the best of a bad situation; sheâs actually enjoying it. Sun, on the other hand ⌠flips the Others the bird and goes back out to the jungle, and once sheâs there, she joins forces with other jungle-dwellers to destroy the Temple and its unfair restrictions ⌠if Claire rolls her eyes at poor humorless Sun ââI love wearing bikinis, you buzzkillâ - sheâs missing the point.Â
Wearing a bikini because you love it is great, but that choice is diminished when itâs the only one available. Making it OK to wear other kinds of clothes and do things besides serve fruit wonât keep Claire from passing out grapes in a bikini, if thatâs what she likes. Itâll just mean that she gets to do it solely because she wants to ⌠If there are only a handful of options available to you, then itâs damn fortunate if you like one, but that doesnât make it OK that there arenât more. If your favorite pastimes are dieting, getting shiny hair, and having your legs looked at, hallelujah: You will receive plenty of support in doing the things you like best. But liking your limited options doesnât mean your choice is free. Itâs still constrained â you just happen to be lucky.
So you should go ahead and do things that are patriarchy-approved, if you want to. Buy new nail polish! Care about celebrities! Have a giant wedding! Wear a thong in your hair! Put your picture on the Internet! Look good according to particular patriarchal ideas of what looks good! Be flattered when men wolf whistle at you, literally or metaphorically! Whatever aspects of being a âHot Chickâ work for you, enjoy them. But donât fool yourself that youâre doing so of your own unconstrained free will.Â
Until the woman who doesnât want to be seen as sexually available can go out with certainty that she wonât be harassed or ogled, your choice to turn heads and revel in attention is a privileged one. Until the woman who doesnât prioritize appearance gets taken just as seriously in just the same contexts, itâs a privileged choice to achieve certain standards of beauty.Â
You may be doing what you love, but youâre also doing what youâre told.
âŚ
Feminists who want to fight for your ability to reject patriarchal standards of beauty or behavior or availability or occupation arenât trying to constrain your choices ⌠Theyâre trying to give you more genuine, valid, supported options.â
- Why Choice Feminism is An Illusion