J. D. Salinger and the Reader/Writer Connection
 J. D. Salinger wrote Catcher in the Rye as, more or less, a middle finger salute to the elite of his day. You could say he âsalutedâ society at large, and perhaps that is what he intended, but the youth of 1950s America were⌠how do I say this?
Shane Salernoâs 2013 documentary, Salinger, makes it explicitly clear just how the youth of his day responded.
It was a love affair. A rapid-spreading fire that completely overwhelmed the author.
 Infamously, he hid himself away, ignoring thousands of love-letters from smitten fans and hundreds of their frantic pleas for validation, approval, and even relationship advice.
Heâd written a real winner. And he hated it.
My guess is he didnât really love his readers. I donât even think he particularly loved Holden. I mean, maybe he did, when he thought heâd created a ravaging new character who defied all expectations and proved him, the author, an incredibly unique individual, with the ability to see all the woes of society while, himself, being quite outside of it.
But he missed something. He was, despite himself, a perfect representation of post WWII America. And he was a voice for the masses, not the anomaly he wanted to be.
But, apparently, the adoration he received practically killed him. And he quickly retired to the woods, staunchly refusing to share the rest of his work until after his death.
What almost any writer would have died for, suffocated Salinger.
 And the reason is caught up in the universal fact that, perhaps more deeply than anything, we all want to be known.
Not just seen. Not just listened to. Known. Understood at a heart level.
In their now iconic "Iris" lyrics, the Goo Goo Dolls sing, âI donât want the world to see me. âCus I donât think that theyâd understand.â
We love that, right? We get it. Some of us just hide away for fear of being misunderstood. Iâd say many people do, at least to some degree. And we all hide our most fragile thoughts, the ones we know but canât explain. The ones we canât even put into words.
 So a book-- wow. A book that does that for us, that articulates the every nuance and facet of our own inner lives⌠dynamite.
You can start a fire with that.
And thatâs what Salinger did.
So why not revel in his surprising popularity? Why not appreciate the fire heâd started and add to it?
My guess is he wanted to be known so badly that his popularity made him feel common. If everyone was suddenly observing the errors in posh society, if everyone was now sticking it to the man, who was he?
Because we also want to be unique.
Salinger wanted to be known for being Jerome David, keen observer, wounded soldier, rare human being. Maybe even oddball. Anything but ordinary. It wasnât even love he was looking for. Just understanding.
Fame itself does not satisfy. It did not satisfy him and I kind of love him for his melodramatic response, showing the world a truth we rarely witness.
Connection satisfies. We want to share our thoughts and have the reader return to us and say, âyou are incredible. You thought of that?â
And when we read, we are really asking for our souls to be put into words. Our uncommon, oddball, reclusive, and rare souls.
Sometimes the masses can be touched with one book, like Catcher in the Rye, but most often it is one person at a time.
So, who do you read? Who gets you?
 EXTRA CREDIT: have you ever met a favorite author? Were they how you imagined them? Tell me that story.Â