Uhhh
I am filing this into the evidence folder that this was all Gaiman’s bullshit and should not have been made
hello vonnie
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Stranger Things
will byers stan first human second
Cosimo Galluzzi

titsay
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

if i look back, i am lost

Kaledo Art
Misplaced Lens Cap

oozey mess
RMH

blake kathryn

JVL

No title available
No title available

Janaina Medeiros

Origami Around

★

seen from Italy

seen from Türkiye
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from Netherlands

seen from Germany
seen from Finland

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@ghostlynightking
Uhhh
I am filing this into the evidence folder that this was all Gaiman’s bullshit and should not have been made
Very sad to hear people have been giving Rachel Talalay shit for the finale. She is the DIRECTOR, and she did a very good job, imo. She did not write the script.
If you want to blame someone, blame the man who spent the last few decades being a sex predator.
Read a few spoilers. Expectations have been lowered and bracing myself...
Is there any confirmation on whether Gaiman will be receiving any of the profits from the merchandise?
I understand why Peter Atkins mentioned Neil - it would be disingenuous to pretend he had absolutely nothing to do with the finale - but did he really have to @ him?
Makes me afraid Neil is going to try to use the buzz around Good Omens to continue to soft launch his return to social media and publishing. That he'll dangle the knowledge of the original six episode script in front of us and, unfortunately, I know some of the fandom would bite.
I hope I'm wrong.
Just wanted to clarify something
The reason we constantly post about the Gaiman allegations whenever we mention Good Omens is to warn potential new fans about him. We're not doing it to make anybody feel bad for liking the show. We still like it, too. (Although, if you want to watch it, please please do pirate or do the biggest watch party you possibly can. :) Honestly we should all be doing that with everything on Amazon anyway lol).
We know it's exhausting and depressing to still be seeing content about him and the allegations. It's even more exhausting and depressing to post about.
We're sick of seeing his his name, too. We wish we could just forget he ever existed.
But sadly, there are SO SO SO MANY fans who still haven't heard about the allegations. It feels like general knowledge to those of us who have known about it for a long time, but it really isn't.
Thanks to his very expensive PR team, you can scroll a long long long long long long time without seeing so much as a whisper about it. It's terrifying to think of how many new fans are about to sucked into the Gaiman universe without knowing what he's capable of.
It's important to us to do everything we can to help prevent that, especially right now when he's in the process of re-establishing his career (Amazon is going to publish his next book, because OF COURSE they are), and trying every disgusting trick in the book to rehabilitate his reputation.
people keep saying "TechnoPathology blog was written by Neil Gaiman, wasn't it. He just made a sockpuppet to defend himself. Omg he's so pathetic".
no. it's not him.
it was an entirely separate man, a british journalist, who was also, apparently accused of something in the past, who seems to have taken it upon himself to absolve Gaiman of all the crimes, or, maybe even hired by Neil's PR damage control people, despite what he said that he's never been in contact with TechnoPathology (which might be kinda true if the blogger was approached by Neil's PR people, but who even trusts what this guy says anymore?).
anyway, his other pen name is Donovan Volk, real name Christopher Court-Dobson.
here's some info from this thread on bluesky:
this was screenshotted from Google search results by the same person as in the quote above:
There's more proof here (bluesky thread) with screenshots and his photo.
So, to sum this up, it's not one pathetic man, it's two. One projecting his shit onto another, and the other one using the first one as a shield.
and let's not forget, these are Neil's PR damage control people:
There's more stuff on Chris that can be found at least on bluesky. Judging by how easily searchable all this was, he was probably super expendable, but people who have been keeping an eye on this situation say that most of his past articles have been scrubbed from the internet, so maybe he is trying to cover up his ass now.
In any case, it could be very, very convenient for Gaiman that there is this very public fool who could attract all the attention and rage. But the fact that he's had access to some private stuff posted in those articles makes me doubt that he was never approached or paid to do this. And at the same time this same fact made everyone doubt that the second guy existed at all, and the hate was still directed at Gaiman.
Masterful gambit, sir. It's a shame that he didn't expect that we can build two mountains of rage.
i get that everyone is excited about the good omens shop but does the money not go to neil???? like unless there’s something that explicitly said neil doesn’t profit off the shop, it’s probably safe to assume he does. and if he does, cmon, do we really wanna give him our money?
i’m sorry to be That Person but this feels like my responsibility as a good omens fan??
also correct me if i’m wrong, please.
“I would not be the person I am without the authors who made me what I am - the special ones, the wise ones, sometimes just the ones who got there first.”
— Neil Gaiman
Ew i just saw a victim-blaming sponsored post on my tumblr dashboard to defend Neil Gaiman. :/
Interesting that a "Neil Gaiman fan" who is a survivor of rape would pay money to make this post more visible as a sponsored ad. Would any actual survivor fight this hard to try to discredit other survivors? I really hope not
Edendale strategies ramping up the PR machine again
Oh Neil is being sued by someone anon?
The USA is the land of delulu where they think if they sick a lawyer on someone to intimidate them into doing something it will motivate them to make it go away
The whole Mafia style intimidation......
Do people in the USA realize that it's literally one of the only countries in the world where you can litigate like that?
You can't even do that in my country unless a law has been violated, the crime has been proven in an evidentiary court of law, and you are seeking compensatory damages
I hope he counter sues
Isn't it amazing how all of this came out right around the time he was renegotiating the terms for season three of his latest program....... And then for some weird reason it got cancelled?
Yeah that's not suspicious at all
It was not around the time he was renegotiating for S3. Not sure why that'd even be relevant even if it was.
Suing someone in civil court is something you can do in many countries.
He is welcome to counter sue but I doubt he will. He'll want to avoid court altogether by settling. He does not want more evidence to get out.
The person who is allegedly suing him is from New Zealand
You cannot sue people using this type of litigation situation in New Zealand due to our liability laws only allowing compensation in the case of a criminal conviction, so it is being done overseas
Screams being advised by someone from the United States which would not surprise me at all
It's literally just not done here at all, Americans who have come here have tried it and the judges simply throw it out of court and tell them to get a grip
And yes the announcement for season 2 of the sandman has only just recently come out as being the final season so negotiations were in fact taking place when these allegations were made public
I imagine the smear campaign is being done on behalf of Netflix in order to prevent him from taking the series elsewhere so he may not be able to profit from the series which lets face it was a very big deal for Netflix to get because that thing went all the way to number one viewership ratings for several weeks
My guess is Netflix wanted to make a specific set of changes to the storyline that kneel did not agree with
This just screams avatar the last airbender live action departure of the writers and creators all over again
But that's just my opinion
She is indeed being advised by a US lawyer. That's not surprising, seeing as she is suing him in the US. The country in which Neil currently resides.
I can't claim to be familiar with NZ civil court but nothing in this link mentions the requirement for a criminal conviction.
Find out how you can resolve civil disputes without going to court or get help from the District or High Court, and apply for Restraining Or
Oh so you were talking about The Sandman, rather than Good Omens. The Sandman also wasn't in negotiation in July. At that point, S2 was in post-production. Netflix almost never renews for another season until after airing, as their main metric for renewal is viewing figures. The crew already suspected it S2 would be the last season and had planned it to be such before the allegations came out.
The idea this is a smear campaign by Netflix is... A first, I've got to say. So you're saying Netflix has found women connected to Gaiman over a 30 year period and... What exactly? Paid them to lie about him sexually assaulting them? But then how would that explain the messages, emails and voice notes. And the NDAs. This is a very grand conspiracy over what wasn't even that high of a performing show by Netflix's standards.
Sorry, but I did also see your previous post that you have only just discovered the allegations a few hours before you made this post. I really think you need to read up more carefully on them. I think you're in the denial stage a lot of us were in back in July.
As a citizen and resident of New Zealand for 39 years I can assure you that people don't litigate this way and the times that u.s citizens have attempted this in our courts they get thrown out and laughter by the judges
You might want to start looking into how Netflix is connected to Israel before you start making presumptions that this is some sort of grand anything
Especially when this type of blackmail literally mirrors what the Mossad did with Epstein......
This is my last statement on the subject
Dear lord...
Actually one more thing before I go
I'm also not going to be a space for advertising and propagating this type of rumour milling when none of the details have gone through a court of law process
Which to be perfectly honest means that this entire lawsuit should be immediately dismissed due to the fact that they have potentially tainted all of the evidence concerned
If this was a legitimate case where's certifiable evidence, they would not need to be propagating it through the media using social media drops as well as other outlets
The evidence would be able to speak for itself without it ever being necessarily needing to be made public
If she had a solid case she wouldn't need all of that smear against him now would she?
Amen
I admire your optimism. Unfortunately, police forces are often lacking the resources to pursue rape cases and so they rarely go to court, and even rarer still result in prosecution. Especially when the defendants have refused questioning and left the country the crime was committed in. I expect they'll quietly sell their NZ property in due time and never step foot in that country again.
There are also ongoing criminal investigations in the UK and the US too. CPS might also be involved due to some of this allegedly occurring in front of Gaiman's child.
In my personal experience there is literally no law enforcement agency that give a shit bout ever prosecuting or pursuing anything to do with rape cases, I would imagine this is probably due to the fact that the majority of these forces are men with their own personal biases towards women and victimhood
It's one of the major reasons I am of the personal opinion that males should not be left in charge of any seeing important in regards to government and/or safety of the wider public
In order for the Gaimans to have property in New Zealand they would need to have acquired residency and the ability to obtain a New Zealand passport as foreigners cannot own property in this country without significant business investments and since you're not from New Zealand I'm going to point out that unless they lived here for a significant period of time they would not be able to own property, foreigners cannot purchase private property in this country and have not been able to do so for at least 20 years
Just because it's currently being investigated due to allegations by somebody who has actively seeking money does not mean that any of those allegations are true
If this person was truly seeking justice it would not be money they were after, it would be a conviction
Maybe that's just my personal opinion on motivation to get justice for wrongdoing, it's never about the money
When people bring wanting money into it, you know they have an agenda to go after someone's reputation and are possibly being motivated by an entirely different set of factors
If they are prepared to go the absolute distance and never ever receive a monetary reward for it, that my friend is a different kind of rage, one that doesn't die, that is a quest for actual justice
And that is how you can pick apart a fake victim from a real one
The real ones never stop
It's possible they were just renting then. It doesn't really matter either way. My point is they're never going to willingly return to NZ for questioning.
The NZ police do not want to pursue the case. Unfortunately, this means money is the only way to punish someone like Neil. Taking him to court will also make more evidence publicly available through discovery. That's why he'll try to settle. I think Scarlett has exactly that kind of rage you mention, personally.
But I also disagree the "real ones never stop". Sometimes you just want to forget and move on with your life, rather than be victimised again and again. People react to trauma in different ways.
There's several other victims who are not suing him (yet). These women did not know each other. They're all different ages. Some of allegations happened decades ago. Then there's also the Whisper Network that has existed around him for decades. Amanda too.
Plus, even the behaviour Neil has admitted to is just awful. The absolute best case scenario is he regularly befriends and sleeps with young fans, engages in "BDSM" without prior consent or a safeword (confirmed even by women who consensually slept with him), and propositions women who are reliant on him for employment. and housing.
Oh Neil is being sued by someone anon?
The USA is the land of delulu where they think if they sick a lawyer on someone to intimidate them into doing something it will motivate them to make it go away
The whole Mafia style intimidation......
Do people in the USA realize that it's literally one of the only countries in the world where you can litigate like that?
You can't even do that in my country unless a law has been violated, the crime has been proven in an evidentiary court of law, and you are seeking compensatory damages
I hope he counter sues
Isn't it amazing how all of this came out right around the time he was renegotiating the terms for season three of his latest program....... And then for some weird reason it got cancelled?
Yeah that's not suspicious at all
It was not around the time he was renegotiating for S3. Not sure why that'd even be relevant even if it was.
Suing someone in civil court is something you can do in many countries.
He is welcome to counter sue but I doubt he will. He'll want to avoid court altogether by settling. He does not want more evidence to get out.
The person who is allegedly suing him is from New Zealand
You cannot sue people using this type of litigation situation in New Zealand due to our liability laws only allowing compensation in the case of a criminal conviction, so it is being done overseas
Screams being advised by someone from the United States which would not surprise me at all
It's literally just not done here at all, Americans who have come here have tried it and the judges simply throw it out of court and tell them to get a grip
And yes the announcement for season 2 of the sandman has only just recently come out as being the final season so negotiations were in fact taking place when these allegations were made public
I imagine the smear campaign is being done on behalf of Netflix in order to prevent him from taking the series elsewhere so he may not be able to profit from the series which lets face it was a very big deal for Netflix to get because that thing went all the way to number one viewership ratings for several weeks
My guess is Netflix wanted to make a specific set of changes to the storyline that kneel did not agree with
This just screams avatar the last airbender live action departure of the writers and creators all over again
But that's just my opinion
She is indeed being advised by a US lawyer. That's not surprising, seeing as she is suing him in the US. The country in which Neil currently resides.
I can't claim to be familiar with NZ civil court but nothing in this link mentions the requirement for a criminal conviction.
Find out how you can resolve civil disputes without going to court or get help from the District or High Court, and apply for Restraining Or
Oh so you were talking about The Sandman, rather than Good Omens. The Sandman also wasn't in negotiation in July. At that point, S2 was in post-production. Netflix almost never renews for another season until after airing, as their main metric for renewal is viewing figures. The crew already suspected it S2 would be the last season and had planned it to be such before the allegations came out.
The idea this is a smear campaign by Netflix is... A first, I've got to say. So you're saying Netflix has found women connected to Gaiman over a 30 year period and... What exactly? Paid them to lie about him sexually assaulting them? But then how would that explain the messages, emails and voice notes. And the NDAs. This is a very grand conspiracy over what wasn't even that high of a performing show by Netflix's standards.
Sorry, but I did also see your previous post that you have only just discovered the allegations a few hours before you made this post. I really think you need to read up more carefully on them. I think you're in the denial stage a lot of us were in back in July.
As a citizen and resident of New Zealand for 39 years I can assure you that people don't litigate this way and the times that u.s citizens have attempted this in our courts they get thrown out and laughter by the judges
You might want to start looking into how Netflix is connected to Israel before you start making presumptions that this is some sort of grand anything
Especially when this type of blackmail literally mirrors what the Mossad did with Epstein......
This is my last statement on the subject
Dear lord...
Actually one more thing before I go
I'm also not going to be a space for advertising and propagating this type of rumour milling when none of the details have gone through a court of law process
Which to be perfectly honest means that this entire lawsuit should be immediately dismissed due to the fact that they have potentially tainted all of the evidence concerned
If this was a legitimate case where's certifiable evidence, they would not need to be propagating it through the media using social media drops as well as other outlets
The evidence would be able to speak for itself without it ever being necessarily needing to be made public
If she had a solid case she wouldn't need all of that smear against him now would she?
Amen
I admire your optimism. Unfortunately, police forces are often lacking the resources to pursue rape cases and so they rarely go to court, and even rarer still result in prosecution. Especially when the defendants have refused questioning and left the country the crime was committed in. I expect they'll quietly sell their NZ property in due time and never step foot in that country again.
There are also ongoing criminal investigations in the UK and the US too. CPS might also be involved due to some of this allegedly occurring in front of Gaiman's child.
Oh Neil is being sued by someone anon?
The USA is the land of delulu where they think if they sick a lawyer on someone to intimidate them into doing something it will motivate them to make it go away
The whole Mafia style intimidation......
Do people in the USA realize that it's literally one of the only countries in the world where you can litigate like that?
You can't even do that in my country unless a law has been violated, the crime has been proven in an evidentiary court of law, and you are seeking compensatory damages
I hope he counter sues
Isn't it amazing how all of this came out right around the time he was renegotiating the terms for season three of his latest program....... And then for some weird reason it got cancelled?
Yeah that's not suspicious at all
It was not around the time he was renegotiating for S3. Not sure why that'd even be relevant even if it was.
Suing someone in civil court is something you can do in many countries.
He is welcome to counter sue but I doubt he will. He'll want to avoid court altogether by settling. He does not want more evidence to get out.
The person who is allegedly suing him is from New Zealand
You cannot sue people using this type of litigation situation in New Zealand due to our liability laws only allowing compensation in the case of a criminal conviction, so it is being done overseas
Screams being advised by someone from the United States which would not surprise me at all
It's literally just not done here at all, Americans who have come here have tried it and the judges simply throw it out of court and tell them to get a grip
And yes the announcement for season 2 of the sandman has only just recently come out as being the final season so negotiations were in fact taking place when these allegations were made public
I imagine the smear campaign is being done on behalf of Netflix in order to prevent him from taking the series elsewhere so he may not be able to profit from the series which lets face it was a very big deal for Netflix to get because that thing went all the way to number one viewership ratings for several weeks
My guess is Netflix wanted to make a specific set of changes to the storyline that kneel did not agree with
This just screams avatar the last airbender live action departure of the writers and creators all over again
But that's just my opinion
She is indeed being advised by a US lawyer. That's not surprising, seeing as she is suing him in the US. The country in which Neil currently resides.
I can't claim to be familiar with NZ civil court but nothing in this link mentions the requirement for a criminal conviction.
Find out how you can resolve civil disputes without going to court or get help from the District or High Court, and apply for Restraining Or
Oh so you were talking about The Sandman, rather than Good Omens. The Sandman also wasn't in negotiation in July. At that point, S2 was in post-production. Netflix almost never renews for another season until after airing, as their main metric for renewal is viewing figures. The crew already suspected it S2 would be the last season and had planned it to be such before the allegations came out.
The idea this is a smear campaign by Netflix is... A first, I've got to say. So you're saying Netflix has found women connected to Gaiman over a 30 year period and... What exactly? Paid them to lie about him sexually assaulting them? But then how would that explain the messages, emails and voice notes. And the NDAs. This is a very grand conspiracy over what wasn't even that high of a performing show by Netflix's standards.
Sorry, but I did also see your previous post that you have only just discovered the allegations a few hours before you made this post. I really think you need to read up more carefully on them. I think you're in the denial stage a lot of us were in back in July.
As a citizen and resident of New Zealand for 39 years I can assure you that people don't litigate this way and the times that u.s citizens have attempted this in our courts they get thrown out and laughter by the judges
You might want to start looking into how Netflix is connected to Israel before you start making presumptions that this is some sort of grand anything
Especially when this type of blackmail literally mirrors what the Mossad did with Epstein......
This is my last statement on the subject
Dear lord...
Oh Neil is being sued by someone anon?
The USA is the land of delulu where they think if they sick a lawyer on someone to intimidate them into doing something it will motivate them to make it go away
The whole Mafia style intimidation......
Do people in the USA realize that it's literally one of the only countries in the world where you can litigate like that?
You can't even do that in my country unless a law has been violated, the crime has been proven in an evidentiary court of law, and you are seeking compensatory damages
I hope he counter sues
Isn't it amazing how all of this came out right around the time he was renegotiating the terms for season three of his latest program....... And then for some weird reason it got cancelled?
Yeah that's not suspicious at all
It was not around the time he was renegotiating for S3. Not sure why that'd even be relevant even if it was.
Suing someone in civil court is something you can do in many countries.
He is welcome to counter sue but I doubt he will. He'll want to avoid court altogether by settling. He does not want more evidence to get out.
The person who is allegedly suing him is from New Zealand
You cannot sue people using this type of litigation situation in New Zealand due to our liability laws only allowing compensation in the case of a criminal conviction, so it is being done overseas
Screams being advised by someone from the United States which would not surprise me at all
It's literally just not done here at all, Americans who have come here have tried it and the judges simply throw it out of court and tell them to get a grip
And yes the announcement for season 2 of the sandman has only just recently come out as being the final season so negotiations were in fact taking place when these allegations were made public
I imagine the smear campaign is being done on behalf of Netflix in order to prevent him from taking the series elsewhere so he may not be able to profit from the series which lets face it was a very big deal for Netflix to get because that thing went all the way to number one viewership ratings for several weeks
My guess is Netflix wanted to make a specific set of changes to the storyline that kneel did not agree with
This just screams avatar the last airbender live action departure of the writers and creators all over again
But that's just my opinion
She is indeed being advised by a US lawyer. That's not surprising, seeing as she is suing him in the US. The country in which Neil currently resides.
I can't claim to be familiar with NZ civil court but nothing in this link mentions the requirement for a criminal conviction.
Find out how you can resolve civil disputes without going to court or get help from the District or High Court, and apply for Restraining Or
Oh so you were talking about The Sandman, rather than Good Omens. The Sandman also wasn't in negotiation in July. At that point, S2 was in post-production. Netflix almost never renews for another season until after airing, as their main metric for renewal is viewing figures. The crew already suspected it S2 would be the last season and had planned it to be such before the allegations came out.
The idea this is a smear campaign by Netflix is... A first, I've got to say. So you're saying Netflix has found women connected to Gaiman over a 30 year period and... What exactly? Paid them to lie about him sexually assaulting them? But then how would that explain the messages, emails and voice notes. And the NDAs. This is a very grand conspiracy over what wasn't even that high of a performing show by Netflix's standards.
Sorry, but I did also see your previous post that you have only just discovered the allegations a few hours before you made this post. I really think you need to read up more carefully on them. I think you're in the denial stage a lot of us were in back in July.
Oh Neil is being sued by someone anon?
The USA is the land of delulu where they think if they sick a lawyer on someone to intimidate them into doing something it will motivate them to make it go away
The whole Mafia style intimidation......
Do people in the USA realize that it's literally one of the only countries in the world where you can litigate like that?
You can't even do that in my country unless a law has been violated, the crime has been proven in an evidentiary court of law, and you are seeking compensatory damages
I hope he counter sues
Isn't it amazing how all of this came out right around the time he was renegotiating the terms for season three of his latest program....... And then for some weird reason it got cancelled?
Yeah that's not suspicious at all
It was not around the time he was renegotiating for S3. Not sure why that'd even be relevant even if it was.
Suing someone in civil court is something you can do in many countries.
He is welcome to counter sue but I doubt he will. He'll want to avoid court altogether by settling. He does not want more evidence to get out.
am I the only one who's sad we haven't seen michael??? it's been a blast analyzing david's hair for a whole week but I expected to see both of them and their hair
Not the only one
I don't hate the tartan suit but the the long line of the jacket alongside the wide trouser does give it a 'child raiding their parents wardrobe' vibe
It's a reference to Rivals, I'm pretty sure, with a Scottish twist. Tony Baddingham wears a very similar cut suit but pinstripe.