I jateithijajrenthis I hate this rpleasepleasepleaei jaterhis
taylor price
sheepfilms
$LAYYYTER

roma★
almost home
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

titsay
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

@theartofmadeline
wallacepolsom
No title available
Jules of Nature
Claire Keane
Cosmic Funnies
No title available

pixel skylines

ellievsbear
🪼
official daine visual archive
seen from Switzerland
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from South Korea

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Netherlands
seen from Canada
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from United States
seen from Norway

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Denmark
seen from Belarus
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States
@gilt-ridden
I jateithijajrenthis I hate this rpleasepleasepleaei jaterhis
I wanna kill myself I wanna die I wanna die please let me die jesus fucking christ I can't die help me
Yknow I do hold a resentment towards people who I think are just doing better than me, a deep resentment fuck you how fucking dare you
Oh I hate this I hate this ti hate this uorue Fucking moving away you're leaving em and you're not even talking to me right now I hate this things go back to normal just no one every fucking. Leave me ever fuck fuck fuck I hate this
I feel really bad and I don't know what to do
Kill me please
I love feeling like I can't ask for help without feeling like a burden explicitly cos kt friend has said how they're taking a break and not dealing with heavy conversations rn and, I hate it I take it personally each time I hate it I'm so fucking
I mean, idk I think I'll die, I'll leave behind a stupid tragic corpse I wasn't meant to live well it's so fxjojf stupid I'll die I'll just die, I'm not gonna kill myself I just expect to die
Gut me like a fucking fish fuck you fuck you jesus fucking Christ it itches it aches fuckf his fuck you almost fuck ahfkcjanaoq9aaaaaAAAAAAAA
You won't know this if you don't spend a lot of time in sci-fi nerdy communities where many members are US military adjacent, but sometimes you find a very strange current of "respecting the rival" that leads people to respect someone like. Erwin Rommel.
And yes this also happened in WWII. You know where the phrase "magnificent bastard" comes from? It's from US General Patton who even though he was his enemy, managed to respect his strategy and gallantry and gentleman thing and all that. And yes, Rommel did oppose Hitler, in a way. But let us remember. Erwin Rommel was very much a Wehrmacht Nazi general and waged war for Nazi Germany.
This is a very interesting one but I don't know where to start so I'll try to summarize it in a sentence: the English-speaking science-fiction world is very much influenced by the US military.
This isn't surprising as most "classic" science fiction authors of the 50s-60s were war veterans (both in literature and film, see Gene Roddenberry though his ideas were quite *unique*). And the whole science fiction culture of having spaceships, usually military spaceships, with specs and engineering and all that tends to very much attract that sort of demographic.
And I'm not saying that they're nazis, they will be often be very vocal in their hatred of nazism (and communism because #bothsides) but... we've discussed how the military, especially the US military mentality works. And there's often a current of "respecting" or "admiring" the "rival" because of their technical or strategic skills (funny enough, they often don't extend this to say, the USSR or China), like it's a neutral thing to do.
For example, there's a TNG episode where a sister ship of the USS Enterprise is the USS Yamato. And I guess that the ones who named it where like "the Enterprise is a big ship, what was other big ship? Oh the Yamato, let's call it that". But... you know what Yamato means, don't you? even beyond the fact that it's called after a WWII ship (as the Enterprise...), a Japanese Imperial ship. Yamato has many meanings but the fact that the fascist imperial Japanese choose the name of the Japanese land and race for their biggest ship wasn't a coincidence. I mean. If I was in Starfleet Command while naming ships, I would make a few objections.
Anyways, there was a fanmade Star Trek starship class which featured, among the names of other famous generals, a USS Rommel. And I'm sure the guy who made that was like "oh, famous general, but he wasn't super nazi so it's fine", but you have to wonder how the in-universe conversation about this must have been like.
I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing to study and even be impressed by military history. I don't think I'm going to hell by admiring the engineering and shape of jet fighters, even if they are machines designed with the sole purpose of war and killing. But I think there's a context when you're writing and praising something (i.e. for example, naming a ship after it, or making it a positive or even neutral fact).
Military types get very offended when they're told that militaries are organizations that are directly responsible for violence and even when that violence is *justified* (defeating the fascist axis powers was very much a good thing) it's never something neutral. Yes, a pilot might show great skill with an amazing machine that is a technological leap. That pilot might also be an ardent Nazi whose jet fighter was built by slave labor. Just as an example.
Can't quite cope with how much this looks like me and my dad
It begins
Photo credit to the exceeding bemused sound technician we bribed with two cans of Carlsberg to permit us access to his gazebo.
Stacia Napierkowska in Les Vampires (1915)
Wasnt someone I knew well or talked to much but i rhink shes dead and i have no way to confirm otherwise
Like generally, if taking any post about how AI users are evil and/or morally deficient and/or entitled manchildren because they don't care about the environmental impact of their little toy and replacing "using AI" with "watching youtube" (or "playing games online", or "watching netflix" or "streaming music" or any other frivolous internet activity with a similar level of environmental impact) would make you no longer agree with it, that's a pretty solid indicator that it's not actually environmental impacts that you're concerned about.
@shirtshawaiian well, I *have* looked it up and Objectively speaking it's "anywhere near" and then some. The most unfavorable estimate for energy consumption from individual AI usage (the one commonly used by people when they talk about how bad using AI is for the environment) is that a single chatgpt query uses 2.6Wh of energy. Watching a 1-hour video on the internet uses 400 to 800Wh, depending on factors like video quality or what device you're watching it on. This means that the environmental impact of watching youtube (or netflix, or any other video streaming service) for an hour is roughly equivalent to using chatgpt 153 to 306 times.
And like. I am someone who doesn't use AI or fw the AI Industry, and spends a frankly unhealthy amount of my free time watching youtube. But I'm just pointing out how, once you put the energy consumption of individual AI usage in context of how it compares to the energy consumption of pretty much anything else we use the internet for, and notice how you never see statements like "I'd fw watching youtube if it wasn't so bad for the environment" from the same people, the way people on here talk about the environmental impact of AI starts looking less like a principled environmental stance and more like a post-hoc attempt to add moral legitimacy to a stance that actually has very little to do with environmental impacts.
[ID: tags. # like generally is being very generous here #i have thoughts on this i wanna come back and type abt it in tags #took me a few rereads to comprehend the post #bc Objectively ai is impacting the environment in a way different from youtube video games etc #like just replacing the text makes the past False #post* not past #like thats just misinformation at that point #then again i could be wrong i will be honest haven't researched the environmental impact of using youtube etc #but im pretty sure its not anywhere near what Al is doing #i'd fw Al if it weren't unethically sourced and also so bad for the environment /end ID]
does watching netflix, youtube, etc destroy freshwater sources and the local environment for Black and brown communities, or is the only metric "energy consumption"?
Considering that keeping any of those services running requires relying on the usage of datacenters whose carbon and water footprint had already been a cause of concern for years before generative AI was even invented, and that the practice of building datacenter infrastructure near impoverished black and brown communities definitely didn't get started with the invention of AI, the answer is: Yes, netflix, youtube etc. also destroy freshwater sources and the local environment for black and brown communities, and the fact that you're flippantly asking this question as a gotcha is further evidence of how people treat the environmental angle primarily as a way to add to the appearance of moral legitimacy over the AI Techbros™ and nothing else.
At some point my nice saintly self sacrificing act is gonna crumble and all that will be left is a suicidal tar pit
God I've tried I've tried so hard for any fucking crumb of anything
Yeah yknow what fuck you, fuck you and your fucking cis girl fucking chaser friend who's finally making your think about hrt fuck you