Do you perhaps have a prior post about or would mind explaining like, where the dividing line is, I guess, between ambiguous genitalia and mild atypicality, persay? maybe tmi but I am afab, with rather deep labial rugae, completely absent labia minora, and even prior to the roughly year of testosterone (NB), a somewhat large clit. looking at diagrams I never was quite able to place myself along the continuum. Hormonally I've always tested very low end normal for female on FSH/LH/estrogen and high end normal for testosterone, with very light periods but significant pain off BC. have suspected some kind of something for a while but docs said its not PCOS so :shrug:, lol. your diagrams of IGM alteration post was incredibly informative compared to anything ive ever found online on my own, apologies if this is tmi but you seem like a very knowlegable person.
so the answer to this question actually varies a lot based on who you ask. there are some who would only consider genitalia ambiguous if its unable to be sorted into "vulva" or "penis", which is a very strict way of putting it, and some who would consider genitalia ambiguous if it contains one or more atypical traits (isolated clitoromegaly, hypospadias, cryptorchidism, etc).
i lean much more towards the second, and would usually only consider genitalia "atypical" instead of "ambiguous" if it contains traits that are not understood as being more "in between" the configurations of vulva and penis (urethral duplication, diphallia, vaginal septum, etc)
so if you were to ask me, I would say the traits you listed would land you in the ambiguous camp, but it would vary from person to person.
