lio🧷 @hehelio - Tumblr Blog

i love being in my computer, talking to myself and wearing gay outfits

its interesting being a weird autistic tranny as a kid and letting yourself get accustomed to the idea that youre just some magically antisocial loser who is "introverted" and is happy being alone and then you grow up and realize that actually you love being social you love hugs you love going out and hate being alone you just hated all of the social opportunities available to you growing up so much you let yourself romanticize solitude as a slightly less miserable state than interacting with people

bahari-official

i wish drawing was a real thing that you could actually do

krowtesque

some more twin peaks stuff because i’m still thinking about it

prints (1 & 2)

kosmogrl

danandphilgay

happy pride month

lesbian-sweeney-todd

What you must understand is:

1. Men are systematically privileged over women.

2. Men love to take advantage of that privilege while simultaneously denying that it exists.

3. This dynamic does not change when the men and women in question are trans.

lesbian-sweeney-todd

Men get very upset when confronted with this!

lesbian-sweeney-todd

👍

viperzerofsx

At its core Utena is about the loss of innocence, the awakening, or revolution of adolescence. When childish ideas are challenged and discarded when reality smacks you in the face. Ideals like being a prince or childish relationship dynamics are tossed away, one who graduates discards it all but is capable of navigating the adult world.

This is why gnostic and shadow imagery is so prolific in Utena and adolescent of Utena. It’s the awakening of the world to how it really is.

Utena is deconstructive, not in that it’s a deconstruction of its genera, it pays deep respect to that. Utena is deconstructive in that it depicts growing to adulthood as a break compared to what came before.

transgenderization

hope tumblr lasts another 20 years so i can liveblog my midlife crisis

discoursedrome

The AI encyclical doesn't yet have a Latin translation, because even though the Latin version is "official", it takes six to twelve months longer to prepare than all the others, an issue exacerbated by the use of terms that don't already have established neolatin translations. Since the timing is important and they don't want to rush the Latinists, they seem to have decided a few years back to move the Latin versions "off the critical path", even though this adds a layer of absurdity to the whole business. Since the encyclicals are still issued simultaneously in like ten other languages, this leaves it uncertain which version should be considered official -- it's likely that it was first written in Italian or perhaps English, then translated, but when the Latin version finally comes out like a year from now, it will retroactively be considered the official copy, and all the others will be considered vernacular translations of it. Which is already a funny story about where pragmatism meets tradition, but in reading about this I found some commentary from someone formerly of the Vatican's Latin office, who mentioned something even better: that one benefit of this process was that the Vatican got to see the public discourse about the document while translating it, which gave them a chance to tailor it to any controversies or confusion that might arise, so that, for instance, if there were competing readings of a passage based on subtle differences between translations, they could pick which one to favour after the fact. This means that this is sort of like Steam Early Access for papal encyclicals.