TheĀ āAnders Is Sexistā Arguement
So some people like to argue that Anders is sexist because of a slight change in dialogue between male and female Hawke. Specifically, the scene where we first meet him. Hawke bursts into the clinic, demands maps, and is all around rude.Ā
If youāre male Hawke, he says,Ā āDonāt threaten me, boy.ā
If youāre female Hawke, he says,Ā āDonāt threaten me, little girl.ā
To a lot of people, the fact that he addsĀ ālittleā to the latter statement means that heās sexist towards women. Heās looking down on female Hawke for being a woman and infantilizing her. Sexist, right?
You guys... Itās not Anders. Itās the writer. Specifically, it was the writer unintentionally bringing real world societal norms into Thedas.
Think about it. How often are women called girls? Like it or not, agree with it or not, fully mature adult women are called girls all the time. How often are men called boys? Sure, it happens -Ā āOh, heās out with the boys tonightā - but itās not nearlyĀ as prevalent.
Men are called generally āguysā and since the equivalent āgalsā didnāt stick,Ā āgirlsā has basically taken its place.Ā As such, itās pretty standard to call a woman a girl.Ā
So what does that mean in the context of my argument? It means that for the insult of calling male Hawke āboyā to have the same punch for female Hawke, the writer felt it necessary to addĀ ālittleā. It wasnāt to make Anders sexist, it was to make the statement have the same impact.Ā
Sure, Anders could have called HawkeĀ ālittle boyā and he should have, really. The thing is, in our society,Ā āboyā gets the job done. You call a fully grown man aĀ āboyā, youāre going to have one emasculated man on your hands. You call a fully grown woman aĀ āgirlā... Sure, with enough stank on the word, it could certainly have an impact, but itās not the same.Ā
To make it the same, you kind of have to add the wordĀ ālittleā. Itās the only way to ensure that it is interpreted the way it was meant to be interpreted when the words boy and girl do not have equal meanings in our society.
Anders wasnāt being sexist.Ā In both cases, Anders was infantilizing Hawke. He wasnāt infantilizing female Hawke any more than he was male Hawke. It was the same - it just happens that the writer was writing from what they knew and what they knew is our society. It was the writer, not Anders.Ā
prguitarman
andulkaphoto
kianamaiart
theartofmadeline
romaincrisis
ellievsbear
izzy806
blakekathryn
gracieabrams