The Entombment, detail (c. 1612)
Peter Paul Rubens
Cosmic Funnies

No title available

No title available

pixel skylines

Love Begins
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Noah Kahan

#extradirty
ojovivo

izzy's playlists!

JVL
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Discoholic 🪩
No title available
Misplaced Lens Cap
almost home
Sade Olutola
wallacepolsom
Stranger Things
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Japan
seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from United States
@holgrave
The Entombment, detail (c. 1612)
Peter Paul Rubens
Today . . . is not that day.
What's your opinion/view on homosexuality?
I do not believe in any form of intimacy outside of the Sacrament of Marriage. If a person suffers from some form of sexual temptation, I cannot and will not ever guide or encourage that individual to pursue that temptation, no matter what their beliefs are. I am called to love them, and by love I mean the unconditional care for their soul. To encourage them to pursue the temptation by words, action, or even my silence, I am committing an absolute act of hate for that individual.
With all that said, I love all people, regardless of the war they are in over their soul. We are not our temptations, our sins do not define who we are and what we were born to do. All people are called to bring glory to God, and we are all beautiful and wonderful.
What a great response. Strong where it needs to be, but gentle always.
In the early twelfth century century the Virgin had been the supreme protectress of civilisation. She had taught a race of tough and ruthless barbarians the virtues of tenderness and compassion. The great cathedrals of the Middle Ages were her dwelling places upon earth. In the Renaissance, while remaining the Queen of Heaven, she became also the human mother in whom everyone could recognise qualities of warmth and love and approachability . . . The stabilising, comprehensive religions of the world, the religions which penetrate to every part of a man's being--in Egypt, India or China--gave the female principle of creation at least as much importance as the male, and wouldn't have taken seriously a philosophy that failed to include them both . . . It's a curious fact that the all-male religions have produced no religious imagery—in most cases have positively forbidden it. The great religious art of the world is deeply involved with the female principle.
http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/979183-in-the-early-twelfth-century-century-the-virgin-had-been
Evangelicals and Catholics Apart
Today I finished reading Jody Bottum’s An Anxious Age, and it’s a lovely book: smart and beautifully written. But it describes an America that I’m not especially familiar with: an America divided between a theologically-renewed JPII-style Catholicism and a “post-Protestantism” (Jody’s phrase) that’s the gaseous residue of an evaporated mainline Protestantism. The Christian world I know best as (a) a native-and-recently-returned Southerner and (b) a longtime resident in the evangelical mecca of Wheaton, Illinois simply plays no role in Jody’s story. I don’t know whether my puzzlement at that is a result of my limited perspective or Jody’s or both. But in any event the book left me feeling like an anthropologist from Mars, to almost coin a phrase, looking at an America that’s not any America I’ve directly known. I can’t help thinking that if Jody had seriously reckoned with, for example, Mark Noll (whom he cites once), George Marsden (whom he does not cite), or Eugene Genovese (ditto), he’d have produced a more complex book. Maybe not better; but I think more faithful to the richness of America-and-Christianity, an amalgamation that has a different feel when you’re resident in the Southern or evangelical provinces. Still, that could be my provincialism speaking.
Let me announce an interest here: I have spent much of the last quarter-century looking for ways to connect evangelical urgency and Catholic tradition. My Anglicanism is just this, an attempt to be fully catholic and fully reformed — something I tried to express when I contributed to this page for All Souls Anglican, the church I helped to start in Wheaton — see the answer I wrote to the last question on that page. As I commented earlier today on Twitter, in the last twenty years I’ve seen theologically-serious Protestants become more and more respectful of and interested in Catholicism — but I have simultaneously seen many serious Catholics withdraw completely into a purely Catholic world, with little interest in other Christian traditions except to critique them — as, for instance, in Brad Gregory’s much-celebrated but (in my view) absurdly tendentious The Unintended Reformation, which blames almost everything bad in modern society on this vast and amorphous (but somehow unified) thing called “the Reformation.”
(And I love you, Jody, but you use “Protestant” in a similar way in your book.)
Or let me take two different, and differing, examples. My internet friend Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry has been writing a series of posts on what he calls the New Distributism — a topic in which I have expressed some interest — but he frames it as a “distinctive Catholic theology of economics,” and I’m not Catholic, at least not of the Roman variety, so I guess I’m not invited to this party.
Or consider this: a manifesto on immigration reform that I, as someone appalled by anti-immigrant hysteria in America, might well sign on to — except that the Catholic authors of the manifesto emphasize that hostility to immigrants is not grounded in (for example) race but in “something deeply protestant and anti-Catholic” in the American mind, and that the corruption of the original American experiment is wholly Protestant: “The United States was founded by anarchic British Protestant immigrants, who oppressed and in many cases killed the local people, with a native claim to this land.” This is followed by an appeal that simply rules out non-Catholics: “May we, as Catholics, guided by the message of Our Lady of Guadalupe, patroness of the Americas, stand and pray and even act in a way that gives voice to those who suffer in fear and pointless despair.”
But do we really want to see immigration reform — or economic reform (hearkening back to PEG’s posts) — as distinctively Catholic issues? It seems to me that these are issues on which all Christians might benefit from thinking together. But not if Catholics persist in seeing soi-disant “Protestants” as their chief adversaries. Late in his book Jody writes that by the 2012 election “the ‘Evangelicals and Catholics Together’ project had failed.” No kidding.
Workspace with a view.
The chair makes it.
Let’s see … uncomfortable chair, view promising maximal distractions, coffee cup between you and your keyboard — I don’t think you’re going to get a lot done with that setup.
The screen tells you what the designer was smoking when he came up with this "minimalist" setup.
WHY WE LOVE IT: This work may be one of our smallest paintings (only 5 x 5 3/4 inches), but there’s so much to see. With each look, you’ll notice a new detail in the background and perhaps wonder how this refined work was made. Learn more about its story here: "Saint Francis of Assisi Receiving the Stigmata," 1430–32, attributed to Jan van Eyck
Great retro Californian sound: Allah-Las by Allah-Las
Everyone acknowledges that for an intellectual as wise and respected as Joseph Bottum, this is some remarkably strange and sloppy work. Might it be that his essay should not be taken at face value? Perhaps he is, as Strauss puts it, “writing between the lines.”
Marriage is civil in terms of interests, religious in terms of souls; it is _animal_ or physical in terms of bodies; and as the family has never, at any time whatever, been able to survive without property, and as man has always entered into marriage with all of his moral and physical capacities, it is accurate to say that marriage, in itself and at bottom, has always been a civil, religious, and physical act at once. It was not a civil act in the earliest times, in the sense that the interests of the family were defended by public force and ruled by public laws, which constitute what we call the _civil state_; but they were defended by domestic power, element of public power, and were ruled by morals or domestic laws, seeds of public laws, just as domestic society, or the family, is itself the element and seed of public society. Marriage was not religious in the sense that there were priests to bless it, but in the sense that it was divine, and that the Creator had said of woman, "She will leave her father and mother and cleave unto her husband," and of the spouses, "They will be two in one flesh."
This is from Louis de Bonald's fascinating book On Divorce, written during a span of years after the French Revolution, and published in response to a reconsideration of marriage laws in the Bourbon Restoration monarchy. One of the odd features of this quote is de Bonald's odd reversal of the Scriptural text, substituting "she" for "a man." Was this an error, or an intentional misquotation?
No one is obliged to take part in the spiritual crises of society; on the contrary, everyone is obliged to avoid the folly and live his life in order.
Eric Voegelin, Science Politics and Gnosticism
His error lay in supposing that this age, more than any past or future one, is destined to see the tattered garments of Antiquity exchanged for a new suit, instead of gradually renewing themselves by patchwork; in applying his own little life-span as the measure of an interminable achievement; and, more than all, in fancying that it mattered anything to the great end in view whether he himself should contend for it or against it. Yet it was well for him to think so. - Nathaniel Hawthorne, House of the Seven Gables
Simplify.: