I love the assumption that I have no idea what I’m talking about here at toomanylokifeels, where I’ve been blogging about Loki for 5+ years.
That’s right, I’ve watched all the movies and most of the cartoons he’s featured in. I’ve also read most of the comics he’s featured in. Multiple times.
I’ve read up on parts of the prose and poetic eddas, including the lokasenna to get a better understanding on inspiration for his character…
…but I’m just a fan obsessed with Tom Hiddleston with no grasp of the character who indulges on fanfiction that romanticizes Loki.
Listen, I can justify calling Loki chaotic neutral very easily. See below:
The thing about Loki that you have to understand is that he does follow his own whim, which lends to him being both a villain and ally to Asgard:
…and when he chooses to do good, “for myself” is a neutral stance to take.
He is himself first and last. An individual, who wont be controlled by fate or by others.
He values his freedom and resents any restrictions put on him. He’s literally made deals with Hela to cheat death itself because he values his own freedom. Even in the MCU, who knows all the unofficial ways in and out of Asgard? Loki. Because he values his freedom to roam where he wants to.
Knowing Loki’s love of life without restriction, Odin has canonically imprisoned him in some of the most restrictive ways to drive him mad. Trapped in a tree. Tied to a rock, venom dripping above him. Locked in a dungeon for plunging Midgard into chaos…
…which, by the way, demonstrates his lack of concern re: the rights of others, and it’s kind of funny that you would bring up the whole Avengers situation b/c Loki literally accuses Odin of doing the same thing. Of going to other lands and conquering their people to rule over them…
Loki’s actions were meant to mock and shame Odin.
He gets back from his time on Midgard and taunts Odin while in chains. He compares himself ruling Midgard to Odin ruling other realms. Loki, who has already accused Odin of being knee-deep in Jotun blood before taking him for who knows what reason.
…but somehow, I’m supposed to ignore literally everything that makes Loki a chaotic neutral character at his default because you think I don’t know he committed terrible acts on Midgard. You think I don’t know that.
Why yes, I completely forgot all that during Ragnarok when Loki defaulted to caring about himself, doing what he wanted, and living without restriction, even ignoring his duties as “king” to enjoy himself like he usually does, fitting the role of a chaotic neutral character…
– I forgot that your interpretation of that movie supersedes any canonical evidence that Loki might be chaotic neutral. I mean, it’s not like chaotic neutral characters can kill people, amiright? They gotta be good and ideologically pure? Oh wait, wrong alignment.
Loki is default chaotic neutral unless you want to get into the nitty gritty of his descent into villainy. He didn’t destroy Asgard because EVIL CHAOS in Ragnarok. He did it because it benefited his people and in turn benefited himself and his own freedom… and because he fucking loves chaos.
We’ve literally had two Thor movies since Avengers where Loki is a trickster who orchestrates events to give himself the best outcome but Joss Whedon’s 2012 Avengers is the end all be all to Loki’s characterization.
Were his actions villainistic? Sure. That doesn’t mean he can’t be chaotic neutral. For fuck’s sake, don’t treat me like an idiot just because Loki happens to be my favorite character. I know what the fuck I’m talking about.
vaporwave
turnnoffyourmind
janainaart
yousharknotpass
germansingergirl
2087
jacobvanloon
titsay
dailybridgerton
