Reader: do you still feel restricted? Do you feel free in every respect? Perhaps it isn't freedom on a personal level — not the freedom for one's personal wishes to simply come true. But if you *are* Him — if your personal will has dissolved and your will has become His, in perfect alignment—then wouldn't that mean your wishes are fulfilled at every moment? There is only Him; why, then, does my individual will not appear to be in harmony with His? Why does there seem to be a separation—an illusion of separateness?
BEINGIS: No, no! there shows tremendous misunderstanding in the above questions.
Yes, I feel restricted all the time. For example, the body can't just fly. And if I forget to wear enough clothes when the weather gets cold, I get cold and probably get into a fever, the body would become very uncomfortable for a period of time. For example, I can't just get whatever the Mind wants, my wishes are mostly not met. I have said many times before, personal will has not been dissolved. I can feel "me" just like you do. I can feel personal will rising and falling. Just like I don't have a requirement to dissolve the storyline seemingly flowing through, there is no requirement to dissolve personal will and feelings. Feeling personal and having personal will is an integral part of this experiential storyline.
Wishes to dissolve personal feeling or personal will is like trying to improve the storyline of a dream, such wishes are exactly an integral part of the dream. When the above questions are being asked to me, you are not sensitive enough to notice that these questions and wishes expressed in the questions above are exactly what the Mind is projecting, an illusion projected by the Mind. You may assume that these wishes to get free in a storyline is beyond the storyline. No, these wishes are exactly part of the storyline, or a dream by itself.
Freedom is not obtained by having the character called "me" in a storyline obtain freedom in activities and feeling. You want to feel free, so that you can freely become a billionaire, you can freely do things that others can't do, you want your wishes to come true. Please notice, and notice again, all these wishes are part of the dreamlike storyline. All these wishes show that the storyline is being take seriously as if they are actually happening.
Yes, there is only THAT. The body's every action is actually THAT's action. Feeling unfree is THAT's freedom. Feeling pain is THAT's enjoyment. Feeling restricted is THAT's entertainment. Just like you may dream about being jailed last night, and yet fully realized by now that all of that seemingly terrible experience is nothing but your own entertainment. It feels 100% real, but nothing like that has actually happened.
No, the character in the empty storyline won't be like THAT. Why? just ask this question to yourself, do you desire that the dream character in your dream last night to be like THAT? By realizing that these desires themselves are jokes, upon that realization now, you stand at the same place as THAT.
In perfect alignment with THAT? All is already in perfect alignment. There is nothing for you to do a bit. Just watch your experience and notice, regardless how the feelings are trying to say, all is in perfect alignment with THAT. All these narratives from feelings, such as "no freedom", "restricted", "suffering", are nothing more than the Mind's descriptions, don't take them seriously. These narratives are like feelings in your dream, keep telling you: "this story is important! this story is important! do something about it!".
Beingls says that not everything is possible; if you’re saying the same thing here, why do you say that everything is possible?
This "me" is always limited. The "me" always has restrictions and limitations. That's part of the experience.
For example, if "you" are a human, then "you" have human limitations. If "you" are a god, then "you" have the limitations of a god. How can a god have limitations, you ask? Well, "individuality" is defined. Anything defined has limitations. This god is defined as something. Hence, the god will have limitations. For example, this "god" can't be everywhere at once. This "god" can't be something other than a "god". This "god" is still limited to being a "god" and not anything else. This "god" can't be "powerless". See how an "identity" no matter what it is, always has limitations? That's just how experience works, because experience is "defined".
But " " is undefined. Any "me", with its own bundle of limitations, can appear and disappear within it. The "defined" experience arises within this undefined " ". The "defined" is not separate from the "undefined", of course.
All of these are stories. All stories are limited and defined by, well, definition, lol.
So any "me" is free to appear within " ". But, the "me" which is human cannot become a god. The "me" which is a god cannot be human. Each "me", or generally, each "story" is fully and perfectly itself. What you truly are is this " ", within which stories of "me" keep arising and dissolving.
This is why he says "you", or what he calls "the seeming plotline itself", cannot be "improved", "modified", "changed", "expanded". Each "you" is fully itself. Each story is fully itself. Of course, it's not like you can hold a "you" in place. The "you" keeps changing itself and its reference indefinitely. It cannot be said what this "you" truly is at any moment, because it's never anything at any moment. This is the "magic"(as he says) of " ". There's nothing, yet there's everything.
A "me" trying to change itself is more of that "me" story. A "me" cannot become some other "me". Any story can arise within " ". But a "me" cannot become some other story or become "unlimited" like " ". So, there's no need to be bothered by how this "you" is the way it is right now. It makes no sense to be. It's perfectly itself. You were never this changing "you", anyway.
This ask was already sent to @divatakesontruth. I don't know why you considered a "second opinion", lol.
You can check out what Being said about "anything is possible" there, already. There's no conflict or contradiction with what he said between two posts in question. It's just the magical paradox of " ".
Here's the post in question:
💬 0 🔁 260 ❤️ 956 · Saying "anything is possible" is an understatement. · by Being_is_IT / Twitter
Q: Because it is dream-like, anything i
