Your latest repost is literally of a scene in the movie where Harry says that Ginny’s funny. Yes, nowhere does it say he thinks she’s the funniest person who’s ever lived, but your idea that because he’s in love with her, and the books are from his POV, the descriptions of Ginny are exaggerated, is false.
There’s no evidence that Harry’s seeing through rose-tinted glasses and just imagining that Ginny is funnier than she is, and she is funny; on multiple occasions characters laugh with her and at her jokes:
…she was the life and soul of the team. Her imitations of Ron…or of Harry bellowing orders at McLaggen…kept them all highly amused. Harry, laughing with the others…
Yet Harry could not help himself talking to Ginny, laughing with her…
“Ginny, where’re you going?” yelled Harry, who had found himself trapped in the midst of a mass midair hug with the rest of the team, but Ginny sped right on past them until…she collided with the commentator’s podium. As the crowd shrieked and laughed…Harry heard Ginny saying blithely to an irate Professor Mcgonagall, “Forgot to brake, Professor, sorry.” Laughing, Harry broke free of the rest of the team and hugged Ginny…
“And Ginny, don’t call Ron a prat, you’re not the Captain of this team—” “Well, you seemed too busy to call him a prat and I thought someone should—” Harry forced himself not to laugh.
Those are just a few moments from book six. It’s undeniable that being funny is a part of Ginny’s character, along with her compassion, temper, and sense of justice. The book being written from Harry’s POV doesn’t change that (and it isn’t, it’s written in third person limited. If it was first person with Harry , THEN you could make an argument that what he’s seeing and describing is exaggerated)
Also there is a stereotype about women being unfunny, here’s an article on the subject https://psyche.co/ideas/just-when-in-history-did-men-decide-that-women-are-not-funny
If you just google “why do men not find women funny” or “why do men dislike funny women” you’ll find a lot more info on it. And here’s an a Reddit thread from stand up comedians talking about how women in the industry are deemed worse than men at making jokes for their job https://www.reddit.com/r/Standup/comments/wavtgh/is_it_actually_common_for_men_to_believe_that/
So OP isn’t lying in the slightest, and you should do more research before accusing them of that.
Ginny IS written as the charming love interest. Because JKR is misogynistic and views crying and showing other emotion (giggling especially) as excessive and weak, she writes Cho Chang, Harry’s other love interest, as a very feminine character prone to tears after the death of Cedric:
He turned and saw Cho standing in the middle of the room, tears pouring down her face. …Harry’s heart sank…He ought to have known. She wanted to talk about Cedric.
“Because Cho spends half her time crying these days,” said Hermione vaguely. “She does it at mealtimes, in the loos, all over the place.”
There, not a single speck of sympathy for Cho, who’s crying because she’s still mourning her murdered boyfriend.
…she led him up a side road and into a small tea shop…It was a cramped, steamy little place where everything seemed to have been decorated with frills or bows. Harry was reminded unpleasantly of Umbridge’s office.
Umbridge is a good example of how femininity and things people relate to it are demonized in HP.
“Women!” he muttered angrily, sloshing down the rain-washed street with his hands in his pockets. “What did she want to talk about Cedric for anyway? Why does she always want to drag up a subject that make her act like a human hosepipe?”
Cho is stereotypically feminine; she likes a frilly tea shop, she wants to discuss an emotional subject, she expresses that emotion through tears, and none of that is bad, but how the characters react to it in the story tell us that it’s undesirable.
Ginny, however, doesn’t act like that. She hardly cries after book 2 (and even then who can blame her, she’d just survived the chamber of secrets and thinks she might get expelled for opening it), she’s funny and sporty and gets along with Harry so easily; there’s never as many awkward moments between them as there are when Harry interacts with Cho.
(Cho is also sporty, on the quidditch team and a fan of the tornadoes. Just goes to show that Harry has a type, but the books’ writing presents Ginny as the better option)
I could also add on about Lavender Brown and how she’s an even more detailed example of JKR’s misogyny and cruelty towards the fictional women she’s written, but this post is already too long. TLDR Lavender also cries and is also very affectionate with Ron, which Ron eventually tries to avoid, and Harry sympathizes with him for.
So yes, Ginny is written as the classic incredibly charming love interest for boys. She likes the sport the main character does, makes him laugh and smile, has somewhat of a temper, and never cries or gets over emotional or over affectionate. It’s not BS
And your implication that making Harry love his romantic interest “ruins” him is very weird; why shouldn’t he think Ginny’s funny and love her for that reason ?
But I think I’ve wasted my time writing this reblog since you misread “harry is written by a woman btw” as “ Harry is written as a female character ” which isn’t true, and the OP didn’t say that at all
