Ramblings of a Dented Square @immortalinfernalengines - Tumblr Blog

New shirt available! It’s too late to wear this to the Queensland state election but the NSW state election is coming up so order it now! Wear it proudly in sight so anyone handing you LNP pamphlets can know from a distance your stance on their party (and those voting will know the LNP’s stance on on the poor)! It’ll be like a shield from annoying LNP propaganda!

vovler

This one is mine :

The ENFP personality is a true free spirit. They are often the life of the party, but unlike Explorers, they are less interested in the sheer excitement and pleasure of the moment than they are in enjoying the social and emotional connections they make with others. Charming, independent, energetic and compassionate, the 7% of the population that they comprise can certainly be felt in any crowd.

Test Yourself :)

Find Your Personality

vaporeon-deactivated20170311

The best commentary on the WA Shark Culling so far.

covvvabunga-deactivated20160217

THIS IS ONE OF THE MOST AUSTRALIAN THINGS IVE EVER SEEN AND ITS SO FUCKIN VALID EVERYONE WATCH THIS

leslieknope

shoutout to the best onion article of all time

did-you-know

Source

demons-dragons

This is how Imagine Dragons imagines dragons. (x)

sleepingegg

Oct 14th, 2013 Shiga - The Shigaraki Ceramic Cultural Park

summersloth

YOU KNOW WHAT REALLY IRKS ME ABOUT AUSTRALIANS

THEY CALL MCDONALDS “MACCAS”

WHY

nialllhoran

catcatchook

you drongos dont understand ok. we go to the servo for fuel, we go to maccas for burgers and we go to the bottle-o for grog.

slothlifechoseme

Wait, what the hell is grog?

jedlknight

i feel like somebody insulted me in a foreign language and then continued to insult me even though i don’t understand

underture

immortalinfernalengines

“Executive” “Action” transvestite Eddie Izzard

bathsuds-deactivated20200309

i should really stop developing crushes on people i can’t touch

somanypetals

mymindpalaceisatardis

did pushing daisies just hijack a post

thedoctorsbuttercup

Yes

mothernaturenetwork

Bill Nye’s creationism debate: Right on the science but wrong for science As a scientist debating the scientifically undebatable, Bill Nye’s doing far more harm than good, argues Peter Dykstra, publisher of The Daily Climate.

worldken

This article puts into words some of the misgivings I had when I first heard this was going down.

nathanielatakora

theartofanimation

Kuldar Leement

bizarreskullasteroid

jimmysnowvakk

This is what pisses me off about Tumblr. You all say you’re so accepting and you don’t want to offend anyone, but then thousands of people reblog something like this because Christians aren’t the minority. You wouldn’t want to offend a Muslim, and if this were offensive to them or another minority, there’d be so many comments about it. But everyone is completely fine with offending a non minority. “You’re not oppressed, you can’t talk!” You know what? I’m a Christian and this offends me and my faith, but nobody’s going to care about that because I’m not oppressed. Tumblr is hypocritical and that needs to stop.

drowningwalrus

Amen to the comment

bizarreskullasteroid

Oh my precious lambs:

Examine why you are being offended. Because this is literally how a sunset works. There is not room for debate on this question. There is less room for debate on this than there is on just about any other thing. We are not reblogging because Christians aren’t the minority, dear ones. We are reblogging because after the debate a few days ago, creationists were given the opportunity to pose a question for non-creationists. One of these questions was:

"How can you explain a sunset if their is no god?" (sp.)

Questions, we assume, are posed so that someone might answer them. And yes, there is an answer of how exactly one can explain a sunset given the absence of a divine force. Now, you can certainly posit that God is the creator of all things and so all things came from him including the sun and light refraction and anthrax and kittens and famine and all that jazz.

But you don’t get to deny that THIS IS HOW A SUNSET WORKS, and of the necessary elements of this equation (Sun + Atmosphere + Angle = Sunset), God is not one of them. That’s because everything else is an observable phenomenon, and God is not. You can explain a sunset without God. You can go ahead and believe that God’s part of it all. That’s cool. Lots of people believe stuff like that, and I encourage you to delve into the ways that people make science and their faith jive. But if you are offended by being shown the basic scientific principals behind a sunset, you must be offended by damn near everything. And that seems exhausting.

In short: