Fic Index
My AO3: impossiblekryptonitecolor
WIP Wednesday Posts:
Note: This only reflects posts for fics that were not posted when I made this. The rest is on AO3 now. They are in approximately the correct order.
hello vonnie

Discoholic šŖ©
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
Game of Thrones Daily
styofa doing anything

if i look back, i am lost

#extradirty
Monterey Bay Aquarium
noise dept.
ojovivo
Peter Solarz

Love Begins

blake kathryn
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

Kiana Khansmith

JBB: An Artblog!
Cosmic Funnies
RMH
Xuebing Du
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Singapore

seen from Brazil

seen from France

seen from Brazil

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Netherlands

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from United States

seen from Hungary
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
@impossiblekryptonitecolor
Fic Index
My AO3: impossiblekryptonitecolor
WIP Wednesday Posts:
Note: This only reflects posts for fics that were not posted when I made this. The rest is on AO3 now. They are in approximately the correct order.
Ellen Weitkamp (American, b. 1995, lives and works in Boston), End of December 2022, 2023. Oil on panel, 19 1/2 Ć 15 in. | 49.5 Ć 38.1 cm. (Source: Alpha Gallery, Boston)
the english language is truly a wonder
all hail william the werewolf, proto-enby
Diversity win! The werewolf in your village goes by þei
Ancient Greek Gold Tiara (diadem), 325-330 BC , Demetrias/Thessaly
Stathatos Collection Gallery, National Archaeological Museum, Athens
šøGary Todd
So I thought y'all would like this too This great white comes to the jersey shore every year and this year they named her and have been tracking her hella so this is Mary Lee and she decided to show herself under this rainbow for pride month A true gay icon
#This is the representation Iāve been looking for
BIRDS
Image description: a group of semi transparent orange birds with glowing yellow eyes flying against a blue background. end Image description
Perak Horned Frog (Megophrys aceras), family Megophryidae, southern Thailand
photograph by Bob Ferguson
lie to me
Favourite BTVS Speeches: ā³ Rupert Giles,Ā Innocence.
#remember that time a teen girl had sex on a show and it crashed and burned but her father figure was like āi think you made a good callā#like legitimately ābased on the evidence- hitting that was 100% understandable and i support youā#oh - oh you were expecting an āi told you soā or some kind of slut-shaming#LET ME INTRODUCE YOU TO RUPERT F*CKING GILES
um so quick question you do know that the world isnāt divided into People Blindly Accepting Of Gender Roles and Smart Trans Ppl. the world isnāt divided into People In Romantic Relationships and Single Aros. the world isnāt divided into People Who Socialize Easily and Oppressed Autistics. the world isnāt divided into Enlightened Queer People and Stupid Misogynists. like you are aware of this ? i hope you are aware of this
I've seen a few posts lately that are like "how to avoid abuse as a housewife" and that's important but I want to say something from the kind-of-opposite-kind-of-the-same perspective:
if you thought you were signing up for a partnership of equals where you shared the responsibilities and financial burdens, the other person does not have the right to pressure or manipulate you into becoming The Breadwinner.
like, in my case it was super duper obvious that what my ex was doing was wrong because they would watch me come home from 50+ hours of work every week while they did three, and then expect me to do all the grocery shopping, cleaning, and life admin shit as well.
but even if they hadn't. even if they had decided to be The Housewife while I was The Breadwinner. that would still be bullshit because when we got married it was based on explicit agreement that we were planning to be a two-income, split-everything-equitably couple. no matter what, I didn't consent to burning myself out trying to provide for two people, and no one had the right to force me to do that.
what I'm getting at here is: just as it's manipulative and dangerous for your partner to demand you give up your job and focus everything on your home life for their benefit, it's also manipulative and dangerous for your partner to demand you work yourself to death so they can stay home.
very important points but i'm wondering if it's a good idea to put them in the same category as the housewife stuff because i don't think it's structurally the same thing. i feel like your experience goes more into the direction of being aware of what abuse and manipulation can also be and avoiding that in a partnership, where as the housewife problem deals more with how being a housewife in itself is a dangerous concept.
it's not just bad if you happen to marry an asshole. it's bad because (mostly) women are pressured by society to make themselves (and possibly their children) completely financially dependent on a man who has been taught from early on that he has to make the decisions for the family because he is the rational one while women (and children) are too emotional to make smart choices. and then the woman can't leave without risking to put her children into poverty. (yes, there are laws to protect women but they do not always work well enough)
not saying that leaving is easy in the situation you described. i could imagine in addition to everything else there can also be an immense emotional pressure not to leave the person who has made themself dependent on you - similar to when women are told not to leave their husband, because how will the man be able to cope with all his difficult feelings after he outsourced dealing with emotions to his wife for so long. but i still think being the breadwinner is structurally not as dangerous as being the housewife in this patriarchal society. feel free to tell me if you think i'm wrong though!
I don't know if it's worth trying to decide if it's more, less, or equally dangerous tbh. but it feels like a mirror in a lot of ways.
The Breadwinner is typically gendered as a male role and I think men are more easily manipulated into taking it on. because the societal pressure is already there, and there are specific gendered social scripts that abusers can rely on - women wanting their husbands to be "ambitious" is a whole trope for example.
and yeah, once you're in that situation, a lot of the being trapped is mental like you say - "it would be wrong to leave this person who depends on me" type stuff - but some of it is structural and very hard to escape. my personal example: in Scotland, it's hard to get a divorce without being separated for at least a year first. and, if you own a house, your spouse has the legal right to live there, even if their name isn't on the deed and they aren't paying the mortgage. that's a huge catch-22: can't get your spouse out of your home without a divorce, can't get a divorce while your spouse is still in your home. the person wanting the divorce could move out, of course, but with what money? that trap kept me in an unsafe situation for years.
and there is real danger in the role itself. financial danger where the other person drags you into debt and your housing and food become precarious, but also danger of illness or even death from overwork. there are plenty of jobs where being chronically tired at work can literally kill you (eg long haul trucking) but even where it's not quite so direct, the danger to health is very real.
one big difference is history. The Housewife has always been a dangerous position to occupy; The Breadwinner was much, much safer even just 60 years ago, when it was normal for a single income to be able to support a family without constant overtime or gig economy side hustles.
so idk, I get why you'd immediately wonder if it's helpful to connect the two, but I think they're each other's gendered funhouse mirror reflections in a lot of ways. you can be emotionally and/or structurally trapped in a situation that's not exclusive to any gender but heavily slanted towards one, and it can fuck up your entire life and put you at serious risk of physical, emotional, and/or financial harm.
I love how this photo demonstrates every single molecule of "how can you tell if a cat likes you"
whole body lifted upwards towards Friend
walking to brush against/wrap around leg
front legs together to assist with tippy toe back arch
back legs slightly back stretch so gooood
question mark tail
head and tail also rubbing Friend
position of trust: cannot see Friend, knows Friend is looking out for cat
SPROING WHISKERS curling forward & down (cat smile)
I adore sproing whiskers of happiness.
Legal experts say employers must take AI-related religious objections seriously, as a 2023 ruling raised the bar for denying such accommodat
"The funniest possible outcome of the AI mandate era is about to be HR departments discovering that 'sincerely held religious belief' under Title VII has a much lower bar than they assumed, and Pope Leo handed every Catholic employee a written excuse," wrote Corey Quinn, a software-startup founder in San Francisco, on X.
Employers could wind up in court if they outright dismiss workers who request a faith-based exemption from using AI, said Ashley Herd, a former McKinsey counsel and head of North American HR who now advises managers and employers on workplace issues.
"Playing priest, and telling employees their request isn't legitimate, does not tend to bode well for companies," said Herd, also a cohost of the "HR Besties" podcast. "A jury doesn't like it when employees get made fun of by managers or HR."
Theyāre calling me every slur under the sun over on twitter for this post
Would you sell liquor to this baby
Yes
No
I donāt think life begins at contraception but Iād still sell liquor to baby
Wait hold on rb canceled thatās the wrong word wait no stopļæ¼
Happy Pride
āknowing how to write effective AI prompts will be a valuable skill in the futureā and what if I skip all that and write the email myself in under 30 seconds drawing from my very own biological database of language and rhetoric (my brain)?