Star Wars / Star Trek
So everyone has their own take on which is better (Star Wars or Star Trek), or who would win in a fight (Enterprise v. Star Destroyer), etc. I’d like to throw in my two cents. To start of my analysis, I’m going to assume that for all intents and purposes Star Wars and Star Trek exist in the same universe to maintain constant physics. I will also be ignoring statistics available on respective wikis for each fandom, as they are arbitrary at best and drastically misleading at worst. Hyperdrive - If you consider the mechanics of the hyperdrive relative to Star Trek technologies, I believe that the hyperdrive is approximately the same technology as a Quantum Slipstream Drive, seen in several episodes of Voyager. This eliminates the argument over which is faster - clearly ships in Star Wars are significantly faster to allow galactic scale transportation and economics. As such, civilization in Star Wars must have either skipped or developed past the warp drive. Power Generation - Considering the reactors seen in both Star Wars and Star Trek, it is clear to me that Star Trek has the superior power generation technology. Star Wars requires a massive multistory power plant to run a Star Destroyer, while Star Trek uses a linear tube four or five stories long and a few meters in diameter to power a roughly equivalent (armament-wise at least) ship. This indicates to me that Star Wars likely utilizes advanced fusion technologies to produce power, while Star Trek extensively utilizes antimatter in numerous aspects of technology. As such, Star Trek likely has a technology that allows for easy production of antimatter that Star Wars lacks. This also explains the tendency for Star Wars ships to be either much larger or notably smaller than Star Trek ships - Larger ships need progressively larger reactors to power them while smaller ships use a lot of space to house their reactors (compare the Ghost to the Delta Flyer).
-- More to come at a later date