op blocked me so here’s this

⁂

JBB: An Artblog!
Mike Driver

@theartofmadeline
No title available

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

Kiana Khansmith
styofa doing anything
Show & Tell

roma★
Not today Justin
No title available
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
NASA
cherry valley forever
Today's Document

Origami Around
trying on a metaphor
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
seen from Singapore

seen from Brazil
seen from United Arab Emirates

seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Italy

seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye
seen from Colombia

seen from Colombia
seen from Colombia

seen from Georgia
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
@jamesblonde0014
op blocked me so here’s this
Send a type or two.
Normal: I love you. Fighting: I’d fight you. Flying: I’d date you. Poison: I’m envious of you. Ground: I want to meet you in real life. Rock: I can relate to what you’ve gone through. Bug: You bug me sometimes. Ghost: You scare me sometimes. Steel: I think you’re strong. Fire: I think you’re hot. Water: I think you’re cool. Grass: I think you’ve grown a lot. Electric: You surprise me sometimes. Psychic: We have a lot in common. Ice: I want to be closer to you. Dragon: I think you’re amazing. Dark: I’d fuck you. Fairy: I think you’re cute.
Send em
Wing design types
Can you imagine it though: introducing a WW2, hell even a WW1 tanker to a modern tank?
“this is a M1A2 Abrams. Fires a 120mm and Max speed is 42mph.”
French ft-17 crew:
I got into WWII re-enacting mainly because I like history. In practice, however, re-enacting is mainly about drinking, with the distinction that if you are an Allied re-enactor you complain about how all the pretty girls are with the Germans, and if you’re a German re-enactor you assure people that while you are not personally a Nazi the Germans in WWII are very misunderstood, and let pretty girls wear your hat.
You should switch sides, I hear Feldgrau is in this year.
I posted something awhile back about this being a shit timeline. In part it’s because women in reenacting, alt-history, dieselpunk, etc, are generally obsessed with Nazis.
Can you blame them? Them boys were wearing Hugo boss. And everyone knows girls love a bad boy with nice threads.
Anyone have that comic of the frozen Nazi with the “nice coat”?
@epitoma-rei-militaris
Moral alignments as John Mulaney quotes
Lawful good: Street smarts!
Neutral good: we bought a stroller for our dog.
Chaotic good: sCATTER!
Lawful neutral: Ooh, ducklings!
True neutral: I was over on the bench.
Chaotic neutral: You have the moral backbone of a chocolate eclair.
Lawful evil: 21 plays of What’s new pussycat.
Neutral evil: One black coffee.
Chaotic evil: It’s the one thing you can’t replace.
Some choice NPCs from Oblivion (click on the individual pics if u wanna see their names). Honestly this game is such a blessing. Never gonna get tired of it.
I’ve been staring at this for five minutes wondering why the fuck im still on this site
I’d say this post makes me want to die but apparently I can’t even do that in peace now can i
Once a month with you people
Me:
“Hey did you guys know that it’s OK to hurt people who say that they’re planning to hurt you? You don’t need to wait like an idiot until it’s too late to actually respond effectively.”
Libertarians:
Me:
“It’s true! The NAP isn’t a pacifistic suicide pact! It’s a reciprocal agreement between civilized individuals!”
Libertarians:
Sort of relevant now, apparently.
Medieval castle stairs were often built to ascend in narrow, clockwise spirals so right-handed castle defenders could use their swords more easily. This design put those on the way up at a disadvantage (unless they were left-handed). The steps were also uneven to give defenders the advantage of anticipating each step’s size while attackers tripped over them. Source Source 2 Source 3
Not really the best illustration since it totally negates the effect by having a wide open space for those ascending. Castle tower staircases tended to look like this:
Extremely tight quarters, with a central supporting pillar that is very, very thoroughly in the way of your right arm.
Wider, less steep designs tend to come later once castles moved away from being fortresses to simply noble family homes with the advent of gunpowder.
Oh! Pre-gunpowder military tactics are my jam! I don’t know why, but this is one of my favorite little details about defensive fortifications, because the majority handedness of attackers isn’t usually something you think about when studying historical wars. But strategically-placed walls were used basically worldwide as a strategy to secure gates and passages against advancing attackers, because most of the world’s population is right-handed (and has been since the Stone Age).
Pre-Columbian towns near the Mississippi and on the East coast did this too. They usually surrounded their towns with palisades, and they would build the entrance to the palisade wall in a zigzag – always with the wall to the right as you entered, to hinder attackers and give an advantage to the defender. Here’s some gates with some examples of what I’m talking about:
Notice that, with the exception of the last four (which are instead designed to congregate the attackers in a space so they can be picked off by archers, either in bastions or on the walls themselves) and the screened gate (which, in addition to being baffled, also forces the attackers to defend their flank) all of these gates are designed with central architectural idea that it’s really hard to kill someone with a wall in your way. In every culture in the world, someone thought to themselves, “Hey it’s hard to swing a weapon with a wall on your right-hand side,” and then specifically built fortifications so that the attackers would always have the wall on their right. And I think that’s really neat.
Ooh, ooh, also: Bodiam Castle in Sussex used to have a right-angled bridge so any attacking forces would be exposed to archery fire from the north-west tower on their right side (ie: sword in the right hand, shield on the useless left side):
These tactics worked so well for so long because until quite recently lefties got short shrift and had it trained (if they were lucky) or beaten out of them.
Use of sword and shield is a classic demonstration of how right-handedness predominated. There’s historical mention of left-handed swordsmen (gladiators and Vikings), and what a problem they were for their opponents, but that only applies to single combat.
A left-handed hoplite or housecarl simply couldn’t fight as part of a phalanx or shield wall, since the shields were a mutual defence (the right side of the shield covered its owner’s left side, its left side covered the right side of his neighbour to the left, and so on down the line) and wearing one on the wrong arm threw the whole tactic out of whack.
Jousting, whether with or without an Italian-style tilt barrier, was run shield-side to shield-side with the lance at a slant (except for the Scharfrennen, a highly specialised style that’s AFAIK unique.) Consequently left-handed knights were physically unable to joust.
There’s a creditable theory (I first read it in “A Knight and His Horse”, © Ewart Oakeshott 1962, 1998 and many other places since) that a knight’s “destrier” horse - from dexter, “right” - was trained to lead with his right forefoot so that any instinctive swerve would be to the right, away from collision while letting the rider keep his shield between him and harm. (In flying, if a pilot hears “break!” with no other details, the default evasive direction is right.)
The construction of plate armour, whether specialised tournament kit or less elaborate battle gear, is noticeably “right-handed“ - so even if a wealthy knight had his built “left-handed” it would be a waste of time and money; he would still be a square peg in a world of round holes and none of the other kids would play with him.
Even after shields and full armour were no longer an essential part of military equipment, right-hand use was still enforced until quite recently, and to important people as well as ordinary ones - it happened to George VI, father of the present Queen of England. Most swords with complex hilts, such as swept-hilt rapiers and some styles of basket-hilt broadsword, are assymetrical and constructed for right handers. Here’s my schiavona…
It can be held left-handed, but using it with the proper thumb-ring grip, and getting maximum protection from the basket, is right-handed only. (More here.) Some historical examples of left-hand hilts do exist, but they’re rare, and fencing masters had the same “learn to use your right hand” bias as tourney organisers, teachers and almost everyone else. Right-handers were dextrous, but left-handers were sinister, etc., etc.
However, several predominantly left-handed families did turn their handedness into advantage, among them the Kerrs / Carrs, a notorious Reiver family along the England-Scotland Borders, by building their fortress staircases with a spiral the other way to the OP image.
This would seem to be a bad idea, since the attackers (coming upstairs) no longer have their right arms cramped against the centre pillar - however it worked in the Kerrs’ favour because they were used to this mirror-image of reality while nobody else was, and the defender retreating up the spiral had that pillar guarding his right side, while the attacker had to reach out around it…
For the most part Reiver swords weren’t elaborate swept-hilt rapiers but workmanlike basket-hilts. Some from Continental Europe have the handedness of my schiavona with thumb-rings and assymmetrical baskets, but the native “British Baskethilt” is a variant of the Highland claymore* and like it seems completely symmetrical, without even a thumb-ring, which gives equal protection to whichever hand is using it.
*I’m aware there are those who insist “claymore” refers only to two-handers, however the Gaelic term claidheamh-mòr - “big sword” - just refers to size, not to a specific type of sword in the way “schiavona” or “karabela” or even “katana” does.
While the two-hander was the biggest sword in common use it was the claidheamh-mòr; after it dropped out of fashion and the basket-hilt became the biggest sword in common use, that became the claidheamh-mòr.
When Highlanders in the 1745 Rebellion referred to their basket-hilts as claymores, they obviously gave no thought to the confusion they would create for later compilers of catalogues…
Also, muskets had their whole “Flint and steel and gunpowder” thing on the right side so if you tried firing it lefty you’d get a face full of fire. More recently, rifles eject their spent shell casings to the right, so if you’re a lefty you get some hot metal in your eye.
@trenchmints further proof that right-handed people have been trying to keep lefties down because otherwise we’d definitely be ruling the world by now
With the except of an slab side AR-15 or T-97 NSR (which I haven’t actually used either…), I’ve never had an issue with the ejection pattern on a ‘standard’ gun.
ARE YOU LEFT-HANDED TOO
It’s astounding to realize that all of these bombers were designed inside of a 75 year period.
You know how to break the stalemate of WWII FPS games? Let us play as everyone but the Americans and British, a campaign where you start as a Polish soldier holding the onslaught of the German army, only to be immediately relocated to try and contain the soviets; then as a Finn throwing molotovs at T-26′s, sniping cold and confused soviet soldiers, and shooting down bombers over your home city; then you move as a French soldier at the outskirts of Dunkerque, trying your hardest to hold your line while the BEF gets evacuated.
Then out of the blue you switch sides, now you’re a Japanese soldier invading Hong Kong, Singapore, The Philippines; now a German at Barbarossa, North Africa, an Italian in Greece, then now you’re a Cretan partisan shooting a fallschirmjagers, a yugoslavian partisan shooting at the SS, a french partisan kicking the germans out of Paris, and for the final missions, a Soviet at Kursk, an SS at Budapest, and finally, the same polish soldier you began as fighting for the soviets at the Battle of Berlin.
Because fuck me, the Anglo side of the war has been done to death.
Do it.
I will write about the following, leave one in my ask box.
Dear person I hate,
Dear person I like,
Dear ex boyfriend,
Dear ex girlfriend,
Dear ex bestfriend,
Dear bestfriend,
Dear *anyone*,
Dear Santa,
Dear mom,
Dear dad,
Dear future me,
Dear past me,
Dear person I’m jealous of,
Dear person I had a crush on,
Dear girlfriend,
Dear boyfriend,
Gotta love how a lot of soviet military hardware came with a big asterisk for their use!
T-64
Keep arms close
Why?
Autoloader can rip them off
ебать!
MiG-21
Avoid aileron roll
Why?
Plane loses control and disintegrate
Gswno!
Mi-24
Do not ascend abruptly
Why?
Main rotor can chop tail
Блядь!
MiG-25
Do not go over Mach 2.8
Why?
Engines will melt
लानत है!
BMP-1
Do not fill back fuel tanks
Why?
Easy to pierce, will burn crew alive
اللعنة!
y’all: finally the EVIL summer is over!!!!!!!! getting ready for my one true bae fall!!!!!! pumpkin spice and aesthetic here i COME!!!!!!
me, a northener:
me, a southerner:
me, a Californian:
when u cum before u get to ur favorite part of the video