taylor price

shark vs the universe
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

Product Placement

Janaina Medeiros
Mike Driver
Peter Solarz

No title available
h
sheepfilms

No title available
Sade Olutola
🪼
AnasAbdin
DEAR READER

JVL
hello vonnie
wallacepolsom
Game of Thrones Daily

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Finland
seen from Mexico
seen from United States
seen from Spain

seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Iraq

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from United States
@kategorically
A looong post about language that matters
As a Ukrainian whose formative and adolescent years were before 2014, I'd like to share a few specific examples of russian colonial influence I experienced (not all of them, there are too many). They could be invisible to people from the countries which are lucky enough not to share the borders with russia.
First of all, I have to point out that I grew up in a Ukrainian-speaking environment. My closest relatives spoke Ukrainian and taught me about our culture, almost all of my friends spoke Ukrainian. So it wasn't very hard for me to rediscover my national identity in my young adulthood. I realize that I am much luckier than millions of other Ukrainians in this case. But!!! even under these conditions I suffered from an inferiority complex for a long time.
In the 90s-00s it was embarrassing to speak Ukrainian in the big cities (well, aside from the western part of the country maybe) if you didn't want people to think that you came from some god-forsaken village. All 'successful' people spoke russian. I remember that for some dumb reason I switched to russian with my only russian-speaking friend. And she was Ukrainian, just like me, obviously she could understand me. It just seemed cooler.
russian news stories in our news programs were a usual thing too. If a russian was invited to a Ukrainian TV program, everyone switched to russian. The jokes about kh*kh*ls were pretty common (both from russian and Ukrainian celebrities). Jokes about 'funny Ukrainian words' were also popular. Those two last things always rubbed me the wrong way, though.
I used to watch russian channels because cable TV had loads of them. I knew references from their dumbest reality shows and TV series. The Ukrainian cultural environment was so underground and sparse that many teens like me weren't able to get enough of it. Till 2006 it was totally normal to show films at cinemas with russian dubbing. As for Ukrainian Youtube... for a very long time it was virtually non-existent.
A lot of books at my home were in russian. And we, a Ukrainian-speaking family, thought nothing of it. Many great books weren't even translated into Ukrainian when I was a teen.
When I made my first social media account in middle school, I used to post there in russian. Why? Well, because it was a russian social network (a total rip-off of Facebook btw) and everyone 'cool' was writing there in russian, not in Ukrainian or, god forbid, English.
I am still ashamed that in my early university years I had a belief that poetry sounded much better in russian than in Ukrainian. I even wrote my own poems in russian. I've never learnt russian at school but for a pretty obvious reason I knew how to write in russian properly.
To this day there are Ukrainians who were affected by russian colonial influence so much that they continue defending their own inferiority complex. They say there's nothing worthy to watch, listen to, read in Ukrainian. At this point it's obviously not true, the Ukrainian language and culture are going through a great revival. But it's important to understand that in most cases this attitude comes not from a conscious choice but from a trauma caused by the centuries of russian colonialism.
If you are not familiar with the complicated history of Ukrainian, you can watch this great video by Ukraїner
p.s. I salute all Ukrainians who tried and switched to our native language even if it was really hard. Ви круті і я вами пишаюсь! 💙💙💙
Anxieties! Attack!
WAIT NO
No, not me you fools! No! Not like this! Noooo!
“I always remember having this fight with a random dude who claimed that ‘straight white men’ were the only true innovators. His prime example for this was the computer… the computer… THE COMPUTER!!! THE COM-PU-TER!!!
Alan Turing - Gay man and ‘father of computing’ Wren operating Bombe - The code cracking computers of the 2nd world war were entirely run by women Katherine Johnson - African American NASA mathematician and ‘Human computer’ Ada Lovelace - arguably the 1st computer programmer”
- Sacha Coward
Also Margaret Hamilton - NASA computer scientist who put the first man on the moon - an as-yet-unmatched feet of software engineering, here pictured beside the full source of that computer programme. #myhero
Grace Hopper - the woman that coined the term “bug”
- @robinlayfield
Applying for jobs is a hell designed specifically to torment autistic people. Here is a well-paying task which you know in your heart and soul if they just gave you a desk and left you alone and allowed you to do it you would sit there and be more focused and enthusiastic and excellent at it than anyone else in the building. However, before they allow you to perform the task, you must pass through 3-4 opaque social crucibles where you must wear uncomfortable clothes and make eye contact while everyone expects you to lie, but not too much (no one is ever clear exactly how much lying is expected, “over” honesty is however penalized). You are being judged almost entirely on how well you understand these very specific and unclear rules that no one has explained. None of this has anything to do with your ability to perform the desired task.
It is hell! I want to acknowledge that the original point of the post is NOT fixed by my providing solutions (the way jobs are filled makes no sense), but also I want to leave some notes for folks struggling with these unspoken rules.
Some brief notes on the correct kinds of “LYING”:
Always use “I” expressions, instead of “we”:
eg “I created a solution to a recurring problem by doing [x].”, even if it was really you and two others in a group
If you LED the group (or did project-management), you can say, “I led a team to create a solution to a recurring problem by doing [x].”
This is because employers like to know that YOU can do, and they also value team-leadership. If you say “we”, they may stop you and ask what You did specifically. You can avoid this by just saying “I”.
Someone asks if you have experience in a program (like excel):
If you feel confident using it: “Yes, I am very proficient.”
If you have used it a few times, and could at least google what to do next: “Yes, I have good experience.”
If you don’t have any experience: “I have used it before. I generally pick up programs very fast, and I’m a quick learner.”
Mistakes (some interviewers may ask about a time you made a mistake, or a weakness of yours):
Good answers are those with solutions.
Bad answer examples: “Sometimes I don’t catch mistakes before sending things.” OR “I don’t like working with other people”
Good answer examples: “I had a problem catching typos, so I implemented steps that force me to check my work.” OR “I prefer to do things on my own so I know it’s done right, but I’m working on trusting my teammates to take on pieces as well.”
Someone asks if you’ve ever led a team / managed a project:
Try to say YES to this question (even if it is a lie)
If you have, say yes, and say how many people were on the team.
If you haven’t, but you played a large role in a group of people, say yes, and talk about your primary role on the team.
If you haven’t, but you worked solo on something that needed input from other people, say yes, and say what the project was about.
Additional:
Misc Rules
You can ask people to repeat interview questions
You can write down interview questions while they’re asking (write the basics of the question down for yourself, like the top things you have to answer). People will wait for you to finish writing, you don’t have to answer Immediately.
Try to keep your answer to questions somewhere between 30 seconds to 1 minute and 30 seconds. You don’t have to time it, but if you find that your answers are taking 3 minutes, you might lose interest.
Have a list of projects / bragging points to talk about in advance
Try to make sure they at least answer the core question asked, don’t just bring up a completely unrelated topic
Example: if you are really excited to talk about a program you wrote, and someone asks about balancing projects, you can say you are good at AUTOMATION, and an example is this program you wrote
“Do you have any questions for us?” (A question asked at the end of most interviews.)
“What has been your favorite part of working at [company]?”
“What’s been your favorite project to work on?”
People like talking about themselves
Thank you emails
Some employers care if you send them a thank you “letter” (email). Sometime by the end of the day (you can do it right after the interview if you think you’ll forget), send a thank you email like this (you can look up other templates, or ask a friend for help):
Subject Line: Thank You
“Hi [interviewer name], It was great speaking with you. Hearing more about the role, as well as what you said about [their answer to a question you asked them] has made me even more excited for this opportunity. Thank you for your time today, [Your Name]
Good luck!!
ofmd but everyone’s a lady
(don’t ask how they do anything around the ship in these petticoats…)
You know what’s up
We're, like, SO rad, man...
i love this. 😂
that is some galaxy-brain advice that just short-circuited my endless rumination on the similar question, “what is my true self?”
Welcome to Tumblr, Twitter users!
Don’t worry, we don’t have Elon Musk here…
But hipsters beware, you’re in for a scare!
*GOOSEBUMPS THEME INTENSIFIES*
This isn’t Twitter. This isn’t your average every day site. This is Tumblr. We’re crazy. We’re weird. We don’t fit in. We’re the fangirls, the fujoshis, the Superwholockers, and the Steven Universe Critical bloggers. We forgot what “normal” was. So if you’re expecting a normal website…
Whoopi Goldberg Covers The New York Times Magazine
Whoopi Goldberg ❤️🔥
von–gelmini:
tenitchyfingers:
Anyway the LGBT community is for anyone whose identity is outside of the heteronormative rule (heterosexual, heteroromantic and cis, all three of these) and any “older” LGBT person is gonna confirm BECAUSE THEY BUILT THE DAMN COMMUNITY. Try asking them. Ask a 40-50 year old (or older) gay man or lesbian what the community is for. Ask them. Do it though. Learn some of your own history from them, and then come back to me then try and tell me I’m wrong.
You’re wrong.
I’m a 59 year old gay man and I’m telling you in no uncertain terms, You. Are. Wrong.
Here’s a history lesson from someone who both lived it and has read extensively about LGBT issues, as well as being involved in many different organizations. I realized what I was when I was very young. I first came out in the late 60s. I was an activist during the 70s, 80s, and early 90s.
This is long, but history is long. It’s important. I tried to break it down into smaller paragraphs for easier reading. But it’s long. I debated not putting this under a cut, but holy hell it’s long.
If you’re actually interested in WHY you’re wrong, OP, I hope you’ll read it.
Keep reading
“”But to rewrite the history of the LGBT movement/community to say that “asexuals have always been there”, that it’s “for all non-heteronormative people”, that “bisexuality has always included asexuals”, that “bisexuality itself has always been a distinct ‘identity’ from lesbian or gay”, that “trans has never been about sex rather than gender”, etc. etc. etc.
You’re simply historically wrong.””
…anyway, this is what I was talking about.
http://persephonesidekick.tumblr.com/post/126198140707/trans-goddex-obstinatecondolement
Also this collection of quotes from older LGBT people (specifically bisexuals who got erased from the main LGBT history’s narrative, as it always happens)
https://vaspider.tumblr.com/post/141863308436/autismserenity-fakebitch-glaschus
“[A]s a bi trans woman who was there and actually saw aroaces being part of the bi community and putting in the work and dealing with the oppression… The bi community was actively rejecting definitions beyond ‘not gay, not straight’ into the mid-90s, because every definition offered excluded some of its members.” - @wetwareproblem, from this post “"[In a 1992 issue of The Advocate], Nona Hendryx’s interviewer used the word ‘bisexual,’ and Hendryx did not reject the word but said, ‘I try to think of myself as asexual.’“ – Bisexuality and the Challenge to Lesbian Politics, by Paula Rust
“When I grew up, heterosexual/homosexual/bisexual were explicitly not specifically sexual. “It’snot about sex!” was a battlecry. This was emphasized frequently as people would sit there trying to come up with some gotcha that meant that you couldn’t be gay and a virgin at the same time. Or — and this is important: that you couldn’t be queer if you weren’t interested in sex. While it’s not necessarily the same as explicitly affirming asexuality, this was a way in which the asexual experience was made intelligible under the mainstream organization of sexuality. “There was a lot of rhetoric that emphasized this point. In particular, that the fixation on the sexual part of homo/bi-sexuality was actually a form of heterocentrism in which hets would try to strip queers of the capability for romantic attraction. “Yes, there are problems there. Yes, there’s the privileging of romantic attraction as better and more pure than sexual. And it’s worth talking about.
“But that’s not what I’m getting at right now.What I am getting at, is that in the models I grew up with, among the queers I grew up around, both aro and ace people could qualify as not just bi, but bisexual…. “During a time in which being aro or ace (or aroace) was even less intelligible to the mainstream — or even the mainstream queer community — than it is now, where were the ace and aro bi people? Where did they organize under when trying to deal with monosexism? Where did they vent their frustrations over LG exclusion? Where did they openly talk about their attractions? Who were they fighting alongside? “Bisexuals. “They were with the bisexuals. “They were bisexuals.” – @atomicbubblegum, from this post
Aside from this, I already replied to this post saying how it enlightened me to reach the actual truth about the ace discourse: it’s pointless, because it’s a discussion on inclusion and exclusion of people in various parts of the world and it’s trying to speak over single LGBT groups’ policies. If you have a problem with your local LGBT group allowing aces to participate, you should bring it to them, not to the internet.
But my initial point still stands. The fact that von–gelmini has his own truth coming from his own experience doesn’t mean that everyone else’s truth is automatically false just because it doesn’t fit your narrative. So no, I wasn’t really being ahistorical. People were there and they remember things differently.
@autismserenity
“actually what you’re saying is only half true because wetwareproblem and autismserenity have made up things that say otherwise, ace pride!“
the thing that rly gets me is that all that history was well-documented
if asexuals existed in the community and were involved back then then where are the historical ace pamphlets? their photos? newspaper or magazine clippings? badges? stickers? posters? where are the references to their activism? where are their mentions in the literature?
not a single one. but someone on tumblr said something was true, so it must be true
the thing that rly gets ME is that exclusionists assume that these things don’t exist because they haven’t seen them.
there’s this repeated logical fallacy in the discourse where people assume that because they don’t know of ace-related historical ephemera, or they don’t know of shared experiences aces have with the rest of us, or they don’t know of any examples of ace oppression, those things do not exist.
and then they begin all their arguments at the “these things do not exist” point.
mind you, what i should actually be annoyed by is the fact that no matter what I cite, they’re like U MADE THAT UP like really??? that’s the best you got????
that’s basically an admission that what I gave you DOES destroy your argument and that all you can do is be like “well then it must be fake.”
but anyway
examples of lesbian and gay publications casually referencing asexuals
all examples below are from a new primary source collection, Archives of Human Sexuality and Identity: LGBTQ History and Culture since 1940, which contains approximately 1.5 million pages from organizations in Canada, the US, Mexico, and the UK.
I have access to it through the San Francisco Public Library; if anyone’s local/school library doesn’t give them access, i’d be happy to share my login, just message me. It’s really easy to search and has amazing stuff.
Here’s a page from a 47-year-old issue of “It Ain’t Me Babe,” which was California’s first feminist newspaper, and then became the first national feminist newspaper. The opening line of this article: “We affirm that all people are sensual, sexual and compassionate beings and shouldn’t be labeled as hetero- homo- bi- or asexual.”
(I mean obviously I disagree with the author, but the point is that they listed “hetero, homo, bi, or asexual” as the four options. (Keep in mind that “homosexual” was the “formal” language at the time, it wasn’t considered a slur; this wasn’t technically a lesbian newspaper, but like off our backs, it basically was one in all but name.))
(OH MY GOD SIDEBAR: I just read more of the piece linked about, about how this was the first feminist underground newspaper, and OFC my old boss, Laura X, was involved in it. she has some “women’s herstory archives” she runs now, by which i think i mean a shed in her backyard BUT ANYWAY that’s a whole nother story)
In 1975, a Eugene, Oregon newspaper called Women’s Press showcased a quote by lesbian Florence Rush, from “The Parable of the Mothers and Daughters,” about women’s rights, which said “this right can be for us all - lesbians, celibates, bisexual, asexual, amazon virgins and heterosexual….” (I’m skipping a bunch of examples that are in the same vein, because why bother giving more similar examples when I could skip to examples of other things on the list?)
…and another one in 1975 Pennsylvania, called Hera, published an article about battered women that lumped lesbian and asexual women together in contrast to straight ones: “For the most part, the herstory of heterosexual women can be summed up in three words: used, abused and abandoned. Not that the destructive male spares the lesbian or the asexual woman when he is set to mate the female.” (Bi erasure, but never mind.)
but where are the people identifying themselves as asexual?
Bristol, apparently; the first classified ad on this 1976 page of Move, a UK publication, seeks a pen pal for a “lonely asexual tv/ts.” (today this would likely say “for a lonely asexual trans woman,” but it was nineteen fucking seventy six).
In this 1977 issue of Feminist Communications, out of San Diego, CA, four women are interviewed about their sexual orientation and how they relate to the lesbian-feminist movement. Two are lesbians, one is bi in a “straight” relationship, and one, Pam, identifies as “self-sexual and not open to a relationship right now.”
I’m not ace, but I know enough to know she’s saying she’s on that spectrum. Later in the interview, she clarifies, “I think labels are really oppressive and I really resent being called straight or bisexual, asexual, non-sexual, or having to deal with a label. I think that really inhibits me as far as relating to people. People see me as one sort of sexuality and they relate to me in that way… Such an emphasis put on who you relate to takes all the fun out of relating to anyone for me."
The way she describes her experiences is basically, “I’m asexual but I hate labels, and I don’t know if I’m heteromantic or biromantic or lesbian or what honestly.”
ok I need to take a break, but I’ve only gone through 6 years of this stuff and there are another 40 to go.
TL;DR: where is all the LBGTQ+ community ephemera that mentions aces? i don’t know, did you look through any?
Can I just be momentarily salty on how we the voices of older bisexuals, trans people, and people of color (aka the people who we know for a historical fact were shunned by the 1960s-70s gay-cis-male centered movements) are all erased and accused of lying, but the voice of one older white gay cis man (aka the people who were centered in the movement, so, you know, someone who would have been hanging out in DIFFERENT POLITICAL/SOCIAL CIRCLES) is absolutely definitely 100% true the entire truth nothing but the truth and nothing else could ever come close.
I’m not sure what’s worse, the hypocrisy, the willful ignorance, or the bigotry.
But like, what if instead of that, we start off with the 5000 people in suspended animation and one wakes up 90 years before the rest like in the original premise. And they guy does enjoy the ship for awhile before the whole “I’m going to die alone in a metal box in space” thing comes up. And he’s alone and the robo bartender is can only provide so much company, regardless of how well they make a space mojito.
And he finds himself back in the room where all the people are in suspended animation. But he doesn’t see a beautiful woman. Or rather, he doesn’t just see a beautiful woman, he sees many people. A child holding a favorite toy. A man with a prosthetic leg. A pair of twins. So many people. And he watches the video profiles of all the other 4999 passengers and tries to find out as much information about ALL of them as possible. Because he has 4999 people for his neighbors and right now he just wants to feel like he’s not alone.
He starts talking to them, knowing they’ll never answer him, but it helps a little bit. He knows all of them by name and he cares about all of them very much. Because that’s as close to human contact that he’s ever going to get, because gods forbid him waking any of the 4999 other passengers up and damning them to a live in a metal box in space that’d be fucking cruel.
And then something happens and the ship’s in danger and it can’t be fixed without a human. He tells the robo bartender that if he doesn’t come back, to tell the others that he’s sorry. And he goes to fix it and succeeds and saves everyone, but he ends up being unable to get back inside the ship. But he can still access the intercom and says good bye to everyone he knows before he runs out of air.
And then when everyone wakes up and there’s a headcount, they’re confused as to why they’re one short. And they find out via security recordings and the robo bartender about the man who woke up early. The man who considered everyone of them a friend even though they had never met. The man who sacrificed himself without hesitation to save all of them. And all 4999 passengers are really touched by this and even after the colony is established and it prospers and becomes a fully civilized planet, the man who loved and saved them all is never forgotten.
And I came up with that about 10 seconds after reading the article, checkmate screenwriters.
See I would go see this movie in a HEARTBEAT. This actually sounds like a good film on its own, and tbh I feel cheated that instead of this, we got gross male entitlement and overall lack of consent. I’m just going to pretend that this is the real movie, because there’s no way I’m going to Passengers and it’s a shame because I was actually looking forward to it.
‘if at first you don’t succeed…’ The science version!
modern art
there are so many elements of this like the casual liam hemsworth in the background, the fact that it comes from a major publication, jeff goldblum’s complete confidence, like this is Art