hella raye hella gay @kimkardashianslider - Tumblr Blog

Finding other trans people attractive is a crucial part of reducing one's own struggles with dysphoria, I am not joking about this. Obviously it is not ever a bad thing to want physical changes to help get where you want in your transition, but, once you start to realise people built like you now can be beautiful or handsome or even enviable for what are usually considered transgender traits, it can go a long way towards helping you feel like those traits aren't so bad to have after all...

liketheinferno2

Decided I'm not done. If you insist you can't do this because your self hatred is so strong it makes you think all other trans people are ugly or unpleasant or failing to live up to some lofty standard of normalcy, that's your business, but consider that I will not pity you for saying this in my notes. I will not pity you for thinking all trans people are repulsive, because that is an asshole thing to think, whether you're trans or not! It just is! Thanks.

sproutson

gotta love the very cool pumpkin man

egberts

LET'S HEAR IT FOR THE LESBIAN BRATZ DOLLS 📣

robotpussy

nevra (one on the left) is bi btw 😊💕

robotpussy

it's canon btw

egberts

LET'S HEAR IT FOR THE LESBIAN BRATZ DOLLS 📣

yamujiburo

ラブリーチャーミー

I really just need Jessie in a snapback. Also James in a skirt.

yamujiburo

she

thingsthatcannotsaveyou

kineticpenguin

munespice

A little spring cleaning 🪴🌱✨

slimespecter

new funny dropped

vaspider

Here's my prediction:

Shortly after (maybe even the same day) the Roe decision is officially published, the TX AG will announce that because of it, he believes he and TX are no longer held by Obergefell. Abbott will instruct clerks to stop issuing marriage certificates to couples who are same-gender (toss in smth about "original unredacted birth certificates" for full shittery), and possibly void current certificates which aren't solemnized. The state will then sue to void all "illegal" marriages they were "forced" to perform.

It'll be upheld all the way up the chain.

I've been saying for years this is all a long game.

There have been arrests in multiple states at gay bookstores, theaters and bathhouses which I also predicted last year would be the cases they will try to push for Lawrence.

So many things are based on the "right to privacy": the right to teach your children your own language, the right not to be forcibly operated on (specifically sterilized), the right to own and create pornography (or "specific kinds" of pornography, and please do not forget that ANY queer lit is viewed as porn by these people), the right to have queer sex in your own home, the right to live with a relative, the right to access contraception, the right to marry someone of a different race, the right to access transition care... and Alito just said "nah."

Us older queers have been saying and saying that this is all so tenuous and so fragile and there are better things to fight about than all the stupid shit people want to fight about.

Are you finally fucking listening now?

sabishiinaq

What do you mean the right to live with a relative?

I totally get all the others but that one confused me…

vaspider

I mean Moore v the city of East Cleveland.

It's even cited in the opinion:

And here's the summary of the case:

When we discussed the Shawnee, KS "you can't live with someone who isn't related to you, no groups of 4 or more unrelated adults" thing the other day, the reason why they don't just limit how many people in total or whatever is because of this case. Here's a more thorough syllabus of the case.

This is predicated on the right to privacy, and without it, we can have laws which allow cities and towns to be extremely intrusive about who lives in your home with you, even in a home which you own. This wasn't a civil thing, and it wasn't, like, a landlord seeking to restrict the people who live in a home he owns. The case dealt with a homeowner whose two sons and two grandsons lived with her, and she was convicted of a crime because her grandsons lived with her.

So yeah, the right to live with a relative - the right to determine, in essence, what your family looks like, and the right to not be forced to live in an "ideal nuclear family" or whatever - is one of the rights predicated on the right to privacy, and it is in fact one of the cases upon which Casey relies.

windycarnage

Super weird to me that ‘love languages’ are treated like hogwarts houses and not like, like, different facets that appear in varying degrees of everybody

windycarnage

Please stop treating a single modifier as your entire identity. You don’t have to treat yourself like the world is Power Rangers so you have to be the Red One, or the Pink One, or whatever. Trust me, you’re doing yourself a disservice. You’ll always be more complex than that.