I wish I took a better pic of this writing in a bar bathroom in toronto bc I think of it so often. Be So Completely Yourself That No One Is Attracted To You Or Wants To Employ You

@theartofmadeline

No title available
EXPECTATIONS
cherry valley forever

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
Claire Keane
Keni

blake kathryn
𓃗
Misplaced Lens Cap
occasionally subtle

shark vs the universe

#extradirty

ellievsbear
Fai_Ryy

No title available
Today's Document

roma★
$LAYYYTER
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Malaysia

seen from France

seen from Germany
seen from Brazil

seen from Netherlands
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Tunisia
seen from Tunisia
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Pakistan
seen from Malaysia
seen from South Africa
seen from United States
@kuningannasansa
I wish I took a better pic of this writing in a bar bathroom in toronto bc I think of it so often. Be So Completely Yourself That No One Is Attracted To You Or Wants To Employ You
to ME baelor had a soft belly ok TO ME TO VENMONDIESE BAELOR BREAKSPEAR HAS A SOFT TUMMY EVEN IF HE HAS BICEPS AND HE IS MUSCULAR AND EVEN IF HE IS THE MOTHERFUCKING HAMMER HE STILL HAS A SOFT TUMMY 🩷🩷🩷🩷
Rhaena’s purpose as a character has been so thoroughly destroyed by this show, and it’s a perfect example of just how little the writers of HOTD understand the themes of the Dance/Fire & Blood.
Rhaena is a young girl born into two of the most powerful houses in the realm, and yet her existence and youth is overshadowed by her inability to procure the symbol of her house. A symbol that id the epitome of power but also violence and destruction. Interesting that she would struggle to obtain one unless there was a narrative purpose, no?
She’s thrust into a civil war of her family and incapable of fighting. So instead she is protected, along with her the young of her family and dragon eggs. Her character isn’t there to fight. She is there to keep peace and protection. She is unintentionally a symbol of the future. All of her narrative ties are with the young, with eggs, with children. In a time where her family is praying for each others deaths and actively slaughtering each other and their dragons, rhaena prays for birth. For an egg to hatch. To bring life about.
And right at the bleakest part of the dance, when it has ended but basically every dragon has been eradicated…Rhaena’s dragon hatches. (Interesting timing). And she names it Morning. Not just a subtle reference to the loss and mourning she has endured and overcome. But a symbol of the dawn. Of the sun rising on a new era of life.
And after the Dance? She’s married twice. And that second marriage that is successful with many children? A Hightower. Of all houses, Rhaena finds her peace in a marriage to a Hightower the main enemy of her family.
Rhaena’s entire story is eclipsed by this narrative of birth, life, protection, peace. She is removed from war, from having a dragon at a time where that truly means fire and blood.
But this show was so desperate to protect Rhaenyra and Daemon from the darkest parts of their book counterparts. That they had to eliminate nettles and fill her narrative importance with someone. So they chose Rhaena. And that not only destroys Rhaena’s story and narrative. But also the point of the dance.
Because now the dance is just a constant thread of “misunderstandings”. Nobody means anything. Nobody wants anything. Everyone is a victim of miscommunication and accidents.
And there is no hope. No redemption. No one who existed with peace and hope in their mind. Only war.
And what a tarnishing of a story that was meant to not only show how power corrupts and destroys. But also how we will always overcome because of those of us who hold hope and protect peace.
What a damn waste.
I just know Alicent is seething like I could’ve killed your dad any time I wanted. Years and years and decades I kept your corpse of a father alive as he stole my childhood and forced me to bear his children and clean him up and feed him all while he called me aemma and invalidated me endlessly in favor of you. And instead of chopping his head off I soothed his restlessness and kissed his brow. I should’ve killed him when I had the chance lord knows you would’ve
why didn’t Corlys just make Rhaena his heir ?
In the show? Probably because the writers didn’t think of it. Because this show is desperate to make team black feminist and deny book canon, but the writers aren’t competent enough with their own lore to do it properly.
Genuinely that’s it. They had Corlys offer it to Baela (and her reject it for no reason to follow canon), so they could pretend that Team Black cares about feminism and believes truly that female heirs are worthy (even though it took Lucerys dying for him to get there). And then they forgot about it. Because it was a stupid scene invented by the writers to prove a point and nothing more.
Once that point was proven they moved on and forgot about it, opting to follow loose canon again and have Corlys pursue making his bastard his heir. The show doesn’t care about feminism more than cheap lines and in your face messaging. They don’t take any time to develop themes. Why would they when they can just shove it in your face and then forget about it?
In the book, however? it’s because despite what Team Black fans will try to gaslight you into thinking, Team Black in (book) canon is not feminist. Not even the slightest bit.
Team Black in the book is not operating under a belief in absolute primogeniture nor female empowerment. The basis of Rhaenyra’s claim is Viserys’s proclamation. He named her heir. That’s why she should be Queen. Thats it. There’s no belief in women deserving to rule.
Team Black believes Rhaenyra is the exception because Viserys named her heir. But that other eldest daughters shouldn’t inherit. This is why Rhaenyra denies Lady Rosby and Lady Stokeworth ruling in favor of younger brothers, at the behest of Corlys.
And why does Corlys insist on denying them and Rhaenyra agrees? Because, and this is 100% true, naming daughters heirs over sons would “overturn centuries of laws and precedents”.
Corlys didnt name Baela and Rhaena because he doesn’t care about women. He cares about his legacy and proximity to power. He sunk his teeth (and fleet) into Rhaenyra’s side because he thought his son and grandson(s) would be kings and lords of Driftmark. Baela and Rhaena were just there to solidify that proximity. Nothing more.
Something that’s been on my mind is the Team Black argument that the writers are “Team Green” because they “made Alicent a victim and sympathetic”.
And what’s funny to me is, first of all, if they made her a victim and sympathetic why does team black still tear at her with ceaseless vitriol and literally wish for her to be victimized even MORE.
But second, and more importantly, yes the writers made her more sympathetic. And then they promptly made her team black and pro-Rhaenyra. They’ve shifted her entire character and motive to center around love for Rhaenyra, support for Rhaenyra, shame of her team green sons, etc etc.
The writers made her sympathetic. But that doesn’t help the “ writers are team green” argument when the only character from team green they gave sympathy to is the one they made team black and devoted to Rhaenyra.
It’s just such a dumb and frustrating argument. Because it stems from team black hating the fanfic-ification of the show. But they can’t hate the aspects that help their side (Rhaenyra being the cause of the dress color incident, daemon being an even creepier groomer, nettles, Rhaenyra being actually cruel in the books, etc.), so they have to hate whatever helps team green. Even if those changes actually hurt team green because they rip the character away from us and give her to team black. Now in a palatable, weepy eyed, sympathetic, pro-Rhaenyra packaging.
all done! Dragon age crossing!!!
this rhaena "storyline" is so 😭 why are u as a subject bitch slapping a princess of the realm????
Last episode was the final nail on Alicent as character btw.
Because now she has officially sold out all her children, she offered aegon's head, doesn't care what happens to Daeron, is on her way to assassinate Aemond, and told the enemy that her daughter is carrying the opposition's heir and that she is a fucking DREAMER.
Baelor, Maekar, Daemon and Aegor grew up and trained together, and it's so hilarious on some level. Like, even long before the rebellion and the deadly race for the throne, it was inevitably one of the biggest pissing contests in Westerosi history.
Baelor has to prove himself to his father, his half-uncles, and the realm itself. Daemon has to prove himself to Baelor. Aegor has to prove himself to Daemon. Maekar has to prove himself to everyone.
And everyone knows Maekar can get nasty, but there's also Aegor, who is older and can be downright dangerous. So Baelor feels obliged to try and persuade Maekar to stay out of trouble, in his usual mild manner, saying something that essentially amounts to "Don't play with this bad boy".
But Maekar wants to play with the bad boy, because he is even worse! All he wants is to tackle Aegor with everything he has. (Picture a spiky ball of steel, fury, and determination — this is basically the seventeen-year-old Maekar.) He will not falter, he refuses to back away, and he will show Aegor what being bad actually means. Baelor: sighs.
Ser Arlan, and eventually Dunk, both believed Baelor Targaryen was "the heart of chivalry and the soul of wisdom", and at the end of the day, they were right. The only thing is, they had no idea what it is like to be a nobleman. Especially a prince and heir to the Iron Throne. Especially the first half Targaryen, half Martell prince ever. Especially the prince who had fought in a civil war against certain members of his own family about a decade earlier. And the list goes on.
Dunk's point of view and the way he sees Baelor is a beautiful simplification for the sake of the story, but can be dangerous in the sense that it can lead to oversimplifications and black-and-white thinking. Like, Baelor could do no wrong, or Maekar was a villain, or Baelor cared about Dunk only, etc., etc. It can be far too easy to ignore the reality of Baelor being a good, but complicated man, whose judgment was not always perfect. They are only human, and they are flawed, just like everyone else, and this is sort of the point here as well.
I like the idea that no one is pure goodness, just like no one is pure evil, even though this, too, can be a slippery slope in terms of the extent and the good old moral ambiguity. Namely, what, exactly, are the lengths that this good man can go to, when he feels he has to, or simply wants to? In Baelor's case, this question remains largely unanswered.
The thing is (I believe) that this whole affair was not just about "Dunk and Baelor's goodness versus Aerion's wickedness". It was also "a small man versus the royals", "the royals versus public opinion", and "the royals versus gods". There were so many ways this could go catastrophically wrong for the Targaryens, and Baelor was trying to prevent that by putting himself on the line, as the man who held most of the power and responsibility. And of course he could have used his power in so many other ways. He could have put Dunk back in prison and taken his time. He could have put Aerion and Daeron in prison as well, if they still insisted on their games involving "high treason". He could have found, or appointed, or hired a fighter, or two, or three for Dunk, and then he could have sat back and watched the show.
However, the fighters turn up themselves (thanks to Aegon and the fact that Aerion has an impressive ability to make enemies). But Steffon Fossoway gets bought to Aerion's side, and by this point the game has become so rigged it's unbelievable. And Baelor, as a Targaryen prince, a nobleman in the best sense of the word, a man of honor, and one of the best fighters in the realm, cannot remain neutral, because he cares for the truth. "Goodness is as goodness does", as we know. I believe he is capable of deep empathy, just like Dunk, who seems to empathize with every living creature he encounters. And on top of it all, he can see the injustice being done to Dunk by the Targaryens more clearly than anyone else, what with the trial of seven being basically a trap, and the alternative for Dunk being essentially a slow death, had they actually chopped off his hand and his foot. But the fact that Baelor had to ride into the arena at all should give you an idea of just how dire the situation was. Publicly. Politically. Personally. It was awful both for Baelor and for Maekar.
In fact, Baelor was so desperate to fix the situation (while making it much, much worse within his own family, though), that he actually went into a serious fight without being armored up properly. He wasn't wearing a proper helmet, of all things, which is an incredibly reckless thing to do, if you think about it, no matter how experienced, perhaps, even practically unbeatable you are as a fighter. It's just something you're strongly advised not to do, no matter how confident you feel.
And he knew exactly what he was doing, and to what extent his son's armor didn't fit him. The grand toss of his head when he takes off the helmet in front of Dunk and the crowd is because the helmet is too tight. All it essentially did was give him, and others as well, a false sense of security. And I'd love to see if Maekar had tried to pull off something like this, especially in their younger years. Baelor would have told him — absolutely not, you are not doing this, and only over my dead body, I imagine. But this, of course, was different.
I could also go on a tangent about the "how dare he love his flawed brother, when he's so perfect" thing. Well, maybe it's because they are brothers? And neither is perfect? And the love was earned? You can say what you want about the brothers' relationship and their traits. But saying that Baelor's love for Maekar, which he displayed literally until his final moments, was hollow and meaningless, a "delusion", or maybe even an "act" (especially when there was literally no reason for him to put up an act in front of Fossoway), is an insult to Baelor's obvious intelligence. It essentially destroys Baelor's character — which some people, somehow, seem to believe they are uplifting by degrading Maekar. Any relationship that is not superficial is complicated, and we are talking about insanely complicated men, circumstances and lives here.
But let's just say they grew up, and learned, and made mistakes, and laughed, and cried, and loved, and hated, and fought together. They were the two warriors of their family, so they were bonded from a young age, they were naturally close, especially in their younger years. There was a strong bond there, and while a lot of different things can be said about its nature, its presence is undeniable, I think. In George R. R. Martin's works it goes to curious lengths — they even die in a similar manner. You don't even have to look for certain symbolism and an intricate, painfully pronounced connection here, because it was there in the first place.
And maybe, just maybe (most probably, actually), Baelor had also held the little, innocent Aerion in his arms and he remembered it, even while looking at the monster that Aerion finally became. And even more than that. If Baelor played a more or less constant, integral part in the life of Maekar's family — and apparently, he did — then, at least to a degree, Aerion is his creation as well. I mean, Baelor trained him, shouted at him, humiliated him and encouraged him in the yard just like Maekar did? You bet. Taught Aerion a trick or two that he would later use on Dunk, because Uncle Baelor had taught him what to do if things got nasty indeed? Absolutely. An ultimate Baelor-ish thing to do, if you ask me, when it comes to his sons or nephews.
And could Baelor have — inadvertently — planted in Aerion the idea that you can do whatever you want, if you're a Targaryen prince, as long as you stay, or at least pretend to stay within certain boundaries, which, again, are rather vague, because you're a Targaryen prince? I really don't know. Perhaps? But if there was one person within Baelor and Maekar's inner circle who could have guessed and believed that there was more to his father and uncle's past than they were letting on, and collected all the possible information and gossip on the subject — I bet you anything, it would be Aerion. (This is a fanon-ish tangent, but I just think it weaves into the story quite nicely.)
And he was comfortable as hell in Baelor’s presence literally until the very end, which tells you a lot not only about his impertinent nature, but also about the family dynamics there. Still, nobody is born a villain and nobody becomes a villain or a selfish monster overnight. It had to be a long process and it took years (as Daeron later pointed out to Dunk). So Baelor and Aerion were simply used to each other, just like everyone else in the family.
And another curious thing about Baelor and Aerion. "Aerion is your brother. And the septons say we must love our brothers" — excuse me, but you don't talk like this about someone you believe is completely irredeemable, you just don't. Even if it's your nephew whom you've known since birth and probably even helped raise to a degree — and still, most likely, you cannot know everything about him, simply because he's not your own son and your brother's family will obviously have its own boundaries — and secrets — regardless of how close you are, it's only natural. But this very well may also have something to do with "anger not being his default" (as Bertie Carvel put it). He is, obviously, terribly angry with Aerion at the moment, and disgusted by his actions — he might have even wanted to kick Aerion himself — but it looks like if they were not at Ashford, it would be just another damn evening in the Targaryen household. The main problem being — they are not at home, and they are under the scrutiny of commoners and nobles alike.
But back to Baelor — I don't think all of this affected his decisions, at least on the conscious level. He had to keep at least some semblance of peace between himself and Maekar, who sided with Aerion — as long as it was still possible, and even while deeply disagreeing with Maekar. He couldn't afford any further damage to their public image in any form. (Lord Leo Tyrell was also sitting there, by the way, representing the high nobility and hanging on every word.) And he wouldn't position himself or any of his relatives above the law. But still, it was his family. And let's not forget about Aegon, who can still turn out to be either good Aegon, or bad Aegon, and is watching things unravel. So Baelor feels obliged to set a good example.
A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms is also about legacy, among other things. And here it's not just in the noble deed itself, it's in the immense guilt and regret of those left behind, when this very deed turns out to be the one that kills Baelor. The gods are unknown, fates are cruel, good men make mistakes and die, no matter how wise or brave. The best you can do is to pass on the values you believed in, even if everything else fails. Baelor believed in justice and in chivalry. We cannot know what might have been had he lived, but at the very least, Aegon lives on. Aegon remembers. And Aegon becomes a good king.
you ever just click on a fanfic and read the first word and go “shut up” and exit
#yes#furthermore this is a skill#you need to cultivate this skill to survive fandom (dsudis)
The whole controversy of AO3 “needing” a dislike button can be summarised with this post btw
“Are you decent?” Morally? Absolutely not. Decent like do I have pants on? Also no
we don't talk nearly enough about sera being raised by noble woman