I wish to return
Today's Document

tannertan36

oozey mess
No title available

PR's Tumblrdome

#extradirty
No title available
taylor price
No title available
KIROKAZE
One Nice Bug Per Day
$LAYYYTER
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
The Bowery Presents

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club

pixel skylines
YOU ARE THE REASON

if i look back, i am lost
Cosimo Galluzzi

Product Placement
seen from Russia
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Colombia
seen from Iraq

seen from Netherlands

seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from South Korea

seen from United Kingdom

seen from France

seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Uzbekistan
@kyuubicore
I wish to return
Even in left wing circles it’s literally like pulling teeth trying to get people to take misogyny seriously as a real problem that is killing women and ruining their lives everywhere all the time and not like a haha silly 1950s problem we just make jokes about now
People leaving comments on my posts about Indigenous knowledge as a science and its relationship with Western science like, "I know Indigenous knowledge is extremely valuable and important, but I only trust verified science." You're just racist. I'm not going to be polite.
Today, many scientists acknowledge the troubling attitudes that have long plagued research projects in Indigenous communities [...] But some Indigenous groups feel that despite such well-intentioned initiatives, their inclusion in research is only a token gesture to satisfy a funding agency.
That's you. You only want tokens for optics. You can't say, "I respect Indigenous knowledge but—" No, you don't respect Indigenous knowledge. Western science is not the only "real" science and your attempts to argue otherwise are racist. There is no argument.
It's like I'm talking to a wall. All the time when I discuss my work as a wildlife & fisheries biologist, I discuss what I have learned directly from Indigenous people in my everyday work yet it's so clear that so many people hear that and think I'm bringing it up for what reason? To appear somehow progressive?
Has everyone just believed this whole time that I bring it up for optics?
Everyone nods, "of course he mentions Indigenous people," because they believe it would simply look bad for me if I didn't.
In fact Indigenous knowledge is a constant topic of conversation and point of reference when I discuss my work as a scientist who uses Western science because my work is useless without it.
I work with endangered species which are endangered solely due to continual colonial violence against people and the land. I can follow the Western scientific method all I want and publish 100 papers on how to fix salmon populations—and get nowhere without Indigenous knowledge and sovereignty.
Indigenous knowledge is not an afterthought to reference as back up to Western science. Believe it or not, we can and should lead any number of scientific projects with Indigenous knowledge.
You need to change how you regard Indigenous knowledge on a fundamental level.
bagele chilisa's book 'indigenous research methodologies' was published in 2019, btw. it's focused on decolonizing current western research practices, but obviously to decolonize you have to understand how and why indigenous sciences deserve consideration in the first place, and what counts as evidence when we look at a body of research.
western scientific method is not The scientific method its A scientific method because others have come up with similar
one of my favorite books to recommend people "plants have so much to give us all we have to do is ask" by mary sisiip geniusz talked about this, how her job as a knowledge holder was not just to transmit the knowledge her mentor taught her, she was also expected to test and verify the knowledge for herself and continue to build upon it
a lot of the ways she talked about that knowledge coming to be, involved repeated experimentation and repeated observation very interesting stuff
Everyone is over here freaking out about the fact that Pearl's VA follows Charlie Kirk, but for me the more telling thing is that she follows Focus on the Family. And it's not only them, she follows a lot of right-wing Christian pages that are openly homophobic/transphobic/racist.
The Charlie Kirk one is kind of funny, but I've also seen people try to say that we don't know why she follows them. Maybe she just likes debate and keeping up with them, right?
No. The plethora of things she follows is enough for me to believe she follows them because she believes these things.
Now does that ruin Pearl for me? No. She wasn't my favorite gem, but also, the character is different than the VA. But I think we need to stop excusing this and acting like we "don't know" why she's following these things.
jennifer paz just randomly posting a bunch of anti-ice/general political awareness stuff on her instagram story is REALLY funny right now. Shoutout. Love you jennifer
"It's not hurting anyone" until it is, y'know
Obligatory "not all people" and "not all situations" yadda yadda yadda, but also, I don't feel like watering this one down into oblivion. You know what I mean.
not to be rude but "how other people conceptualize of/discuss/write fictional characters makes me feel like i don't deserve to exist" is a wild things to say, go to therapy.
Dingdingdingdingding, it's the classic "go to therapy" line that happens in these situations that I was talking about like a long time ago already
Could make a bingo out of this it's like clockwork
If somebody puts a canonically gay character in a straight ship. everyone agrees that's fucked up.
But if someone puts a aro/ace/aroace character in what is basically an allo ship, apparently that needed to happen and it's "just a headcanon" or whatever bullshit.
If you're GONNA ship aro/ace/aroace characters, at least have the good grace to take into account the guilt they'll be feeling over not being able to reciprocate the other characters feelings when you're writing the fanfic between them.
Also, you can't therapy your way out of systematic oppression.
"you can't therapy your way out of systematic oppression" is brilliantly put, thank you.
For one thing, the absolute state of our orientations is that they're so misunderstood, so misrepresented and so unprotected from conversion therapy that I'm AFRAID going to therapy would lead to more aphobia and "it's not a sexual orientation you're just mentally ill" reasoning thrown at me. Therapy isn't inherently safe. (Well, I'm also sure a properly good therapist WOULD process things properly, but the risk is there, anyway.)
But yeah, also, with how invisibilized and stigmatized our orientations are, it has taken me, and is still every day taking me hard work to not internalize the fact that I should hate myself, or "fix myself 'cus I'm not right as I am", or both. And I draw about these things so that hopefully other people who also have to do this work feel less alone, and MORE mentally sane.
But yeah surely I SHOULD go to therapy for trying to bring better mental sanity and self-love to myself and others.
"It's not hurting anyone" until it is, y'know
Obligatory "not all people" and "not all situations" yadda yadda yadda, but also, I don't feel like watering this one down into oblivion. You know what I mean.
not to be rude but "how other people conceptualize of/discuss/write fictional characters makes me feel like i don't deserve to exist" is a wild things to say, go to therapy.
Dingdingdingdingding, it's the classic "go to therapy" line that happens in these situations that I was talking about like a long time ago already
Could make a bingo out of this it's like clockwork
Help me survive until October
Hello everyone, my parents have decided to cut my financial support because I'm involved with an LGBT organization. I'm currently interviewing for jobs, but I won't have income until at least October. Please reblog if you can't donate
https://paypal.me/pluto13x
https://ko-fi.com/pluto13x
I'm also taking commissions. Here is my portfolio:
Game Developer
The personalities of children with C-PTSD develop in the shadow of trauma and they appear to never make the developmental leap from amygdala to cortical executive functioning. Their lives are lived in a survival-based, amygdala-centric manner, and they are less connected to the consensual realities of the group mind. They are, in essence, constantly vulnerable to takeover by a more primitive version of the modern human brain—yet are tasked to live among others whose brains are organized in a different way. Day-to-day life is stressful, threatening, and difficult to navigate
Louis Cozolino, The Neuroscience of Psychotherapy
Wow, I can't think of anything more helpful to people who spent a large portion of their lives being traumatized and possibly gaslit than being spoken about categorically as on a "more primitive" level than the rest of humanity!
I get what this thinks it's describing - that chronic trauma can bias someone toward threat-response, make stress harder to regulate, make everyday life feel like it has stakes it objectively doesn't.
But the way it's phrased is doing that too-familiar style of psychological writing where a real mechanism gets inflated into a whole identity category that only ends up leading to harsher stigma against the people who have it.
"Never make the developmental leap," "amygdala-centric," "more primitive," "less connected to consensual reality". That's basically describing traumatized people as stuck in some earlier stage and not fully trustworthy about what's real. Like we're running an outdated operating system and everyone else has the current patch.
That framing is not remotely neutral. It dovetails perfectly with the way people already treat us when we're upset. It hands them a vocabulary for dismissing distress instead of understanding it.
Also, "less connected to the consensual realities of the group mind" is a wild thing to say about people whose trauma often came from group dynamics that were abusive, coercive, or straight-up gaslighting (ex. educational trauma, religious trauma, you get the idea). Sometimes the issue isn't that someone fundamentally can't access "consensus reality", it's that they learned the hard way that what gets called "consensus reality" can be wrong, hostile, or unsafe.
There's a useful idea here about how trauma shapes behavior. But dressing it up as "primitive vs. modern brain" turns an adaptation into a hierarchy of humanity and that's where it starts to feel less like insight and more like a socially acceptable way to say "these people are less reliable narrators of their own lives than the rest of us."
Finding out AI companies are chewing through - literally, they’re pulping and burning them as they go - millions of books often including 1/1s and old texts that cannot be reprinted
Meanwhile there’s always some dipshit telling me AI is the future and we’ve got to just let companies erase human history and literature so they can train their abomination machines to pretend to think like people because a judge said it’s fine
AI companies are buying and scanning printed books for training data, raising copyright and cultural preservation concerns as rare volumes a
Very normal things happening in new york
are you tme or tma
"i know you're nonbinary but which of these two arbitrarily constructed gender categories do you fit into" genuinely are you having a laugh
Referring to the distinction between those who are and aren’t affected by transmisogyny as “arbitrarily constructed gender categories” tells me exactly which of the two you fall into lmao
evergreen lmaooo
The application of TME/TMA terminology stops making sense once you take intersectionality into account. Dark-skinned women, particularly dark-skinned black women, are victims of masculinization and often experience this because the concepts of womanhood and femininity (at least in western societies) are almost always measured by eurocentric standards, colorism, and a general proximity to whiteness. Violent transmisogynists shoot first, ask questions never.
Michelle Dionne Peacock was a 59-year-old black woman who, by our communities’ definition, would’ve been transmisogyny-exempt on account of being a cisgender woman. However, she was killed on account of Tommy Wayne Earl’s misogynoir AND transmisogyny, even going so far as to refer to her as a “male acting like a woman” when questioned on the murder. Earl had no grounds for his accusations apart from Peacock’s appearance which, last time I checked, doesn’t indicate anything save her blackness. Considering Earl also had to be separated from black inmates due to “not getting along with them”, I think it’s warranted to assume his transmisogynistic motive is equally rooted in misogynoirist behaviors/mindsets that masculinize black women. In other words: he’s just as much of a violent racist as he is a violent transmisogynist, and whether or not Peacock was actually a transgender woman meant nothing to him. Only his ideology mattered, therefore that was the only “truth” he recognized. Most transphobes are like this.
Caster Semenya and her battle against the International Olympic Committee’s intersexist, transmisogynistic policies is another case I think of, though thankfully it isn’t a fatal one. In 2019, World Athletics (formerly the IAAF) introduced new regulations that forced intersex athletes and other athletes with DSDs like Semenya to take medication that would suppress their testosterone levels. Semenya refused, as was her right to. Ever since, she has been pursuing legal action against these regulations. In tandem with her legal battles, transmisogynoirist and intersexist cultural wars were sparked because of the barring of Caster Semenya. Her being a cis woman in actuality did not stop these culture wars from happening. People only cared about the narratives being fed to them, and again, most transphobes are like this.
Semenya is not the first nor the last cis black woman in the sports industry to be subjected to this treatment. Far from it. Serena Williams is infamously made a target by misogynoirist sports reporters and commentators whose actions against her often skew into transmisogynist territories as well (see: Mark Knight‘s political cartoon for The Herald Sun from September 2018). In that same year, Williams addressed internet conspiracies around her having been “born a man” as well.
Even Michelle Obama has been subjected to transmisogynoirist harassment from American right-wingers who repeatedly make conspiracies and accusations of her “secretly being a man”. Quite recently, UFC fighter Josh Hokit peddled this exact rhetoric on the South Lawn of the White House. Emboldened by the likes of Joe Rogan and in the shadow of the Trump Administration, no doubt.
On a less public level, I was shared a video by a black co-worker that applies to this; said video was of a black woman being harassed in a women’s restroom. As she’s filming, an older white woman comes around the corner and insists that she is in the women’s restroom, implying that the woman recording shouldn’t be there. She tries to ignore the old lady at first, but ultimately (and rightfully) tells her to leave her alone. Only for that same woman to claim she’s “mean” for doing so, as if she didn’t spend most of her time harassing this woman.
Admittedly, I used to sympathize with people’s reasons for using TME/TMA terminology in communal spaces. I felt obligated to use it since it was the least I could do for my peers. In retrospect, this terminology is flawed. People regard it as another version for AGAB terminology (which cannot be stressed enough that it was appropriated from intersex spaces in the first place), but it’s deeper than that.
I am not a woman, but your average person is going to assume I am a black woman. They have the potential to exercise the same violent misogynoirist, or even transmisogynoirist, mindset against me as Tommy Wayne Earl had against Michelle Dionne Peacock. My experiences aren’t like that of an actual black trans woman, nor was it for Michelle, but that doesn’t change the fact that our societies don’t care about distinction. Our societies can and will operate on its own optics regardless of who we are, and once they perceive us one way, they aren’t going to stop and check if that’s actually true or applies to their beliefs. If American white supremacists can still peddle “Michelle Obama is a man!” conspiracies in 2026 and with confidence, what makes you think our societies as a whole will suddenly start caring about who does or doesn’t apply to their systems of oppression?
Not only does this terminology overlook the nuances of sex and how it is experienced among people, but it also overlooks nuances like the racialization of gender and sex, especially when those nuances CAN and HAVE led to the discrimination of people like Michelle Dionne Peacock, Caster Semenya, Serena Williams, Michelle Obama, that woman getting dressed, and many, many more.
You cannot separate these cases of racist, misogynoirist discrimination and violence from the transmisogynistic rhetoric therein. You simply can’t. It’s all connected. The notion that any of these women are men relies on our societies’ fearmongering around black people and transgender people alike as well as how they dehumanize us. Worst of all, we see the fallout of that constantly in our communities, seeing how black trans people— especially black trans women— hold the highest statistics of being hate-crimed out of any other transgender demographic.
The more I looked into these cases, the more I stopped referring to myself as “TME”. If we can acknowledge that transphobia is capable of affecting cisgender people, then how is it any different from acknowledging that our societies’ weaponization of gender and sex can’t be binarized by something like TME or TMA? Cisgender black women— be them perisex or intersex— most certainly are affected by transmisogyny, given the many ways misogynoirist and transmisogynistic ideologies intersect. Those circumstances alone show why TME/TMA distinctions ARE arbitrary.
How is hell considered a swear word,loser language
End Of The World 'Kingdom Hearts' PlayStation 2 Yoko Shimomura
AI companies are pouring tens of billions of dollars into enormous data centers. They're being built on top of a mountain of hidden debt.
As Japanese financial newspaper Nikkei Asia found in a recent investigation, just five US tech giants — Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, and Oracle — are hiding an estimated $1.65 trillion in debt that doesn’t appear on balance sheets. That’s even more than the $1.35 trillion in debt the five companies officially reported in their financial data for the most recent quarter. Meta alone has amassed around $420 billion in off-balance-sheet debt, according to Nikkei, highlighting how precarious the AI industry’s steep investment in AI has become, and inspiring comparisons to energy company Enron, which collapsed in spectacular fashion in 2001 because of similar debts hidden behind shell companies. Like Enron, they’re using special purpose vehicles, or off-balance sheet arrangements such as legally distinct subsidiaries, as a way to make their financial reporting look healthier than it actually is — often a glaring sign that something is deeply amiss behind the scenes.
22 July 2026