this real?
yeah i was the baby
This is fake. It is obviously a picture from like the 90s. Look at the width of that tv. It has an antenna on it. Antenna. Does anyone even remember why they had them on tvs?? I don't think so. Also, wireless printers already exist RIGHT NOW. Why would people bother with the wires in the future? Is this a very "retro" couple? That would actually explain their....fake-ancient-Greek outfits... Moving on, that printer is obviously stocked with paper. Is that a paper baby? Or did the people of the future supposedly make paper-shaped organic material that is made into babies? Unlikely. Think of all the extra effort to make it all white. It doesn't have to be white, the white serves no purpose, therefore it is safe to say it's paper. Babies, however, are made of a different material than paper. Plant cells are different from animal cells, and paper wouldn't hold all the ingredients necessary for a baby, for example the 70% water or so. The paper isn't even wet. And you'd expect them to at least use a 3D printer to print babies. Their laptops are also relatively bulky and angle-y. And it is much more likely, in the event of printing babies, that the baby would be naked, and not come printed in a diaper. Therefore, using all the above evidence, I can only conclude it is a picture of the 90s or maaaaaybe early 2000s, that depicts a negligent couple with their old-enough-to-crawl, not-at-all-newborn baby, who got their feet stuck in the printer and is likely to experience an injury, soon. The parents are probably in a "chat room" or "aol messenger" (is that what it was called?), or looking at long and static HTML pages, with avid interest in this new technology. While claiming it will never catch on.
