I believe History on the Web has many possible future directions. It is inevitable, with the progression of society, that the use of paper documents, and the idea of dusty archive research, will become obsolete in the history profession. As a result, it is the responsibility of university students today, to ease this inevitable transition for potential history scholars. In the Thomas and Johnson Chapter of the textbook, it discusses the speed at which technology is “developing” and often this results in “little or no backward compatibility”. Due to this possible incompatibility, it is the responsibility of historians to convey these needs to individuals in the technology industry. This can be directly related to the idea of interdisciplinary work in historical research. If historians work together with the technology or web industry, this could potentially prevent many of these incompatibility issues.
Personally, I believe that because of issues in technology, with products like storage devices, it causes a reliance on the Internet, for example web based applications and archives. Although websites and applications may change, the Internet itself for the most part has not changed drastically, apart from its speed and security. It is obvious that there are far more sites now than there was, for example, ten years ago, but the general framework and basis of the Internet itself remains the same. This could help to ensure that the differences between media do not cause inability to certain resources i.e. the inability to use floppy disks. If data is available on the web, for example, “the cloud”, it is more likely that such technology will not outdate as quickly. In the same sense, this could raise the possibility, which Thomas and Johnson discuss, that massive amounts of data can be lost in the process. Almost anyone has dealt with such technology issues before. This can be a large issue when there are thousands and thousands of documents at risk, and overall this poses a huge issue to historical research. Furthermore, there is much of the authentic research experience lost with simply scrolling through documents. The treasured archival research process is lost in the process. This was also discussed numerous times in class, that history on the web loses the “human value”, the expertise, the sensory experience, and the knowledge. This in turn, may serve as a detriment to academic research.
However, in part due to the increase in technology and the accessibility of resources, there is a multitude of data available with the touch of a button. The copious amounts of information available can cause some form of an “overload”, however for the most part, it is beneficial for those who study history. With the amount of data easily available to a historian, it ensures that the research process is exhausted to the fullest potential. It is important to note that this large amount of research is available due to the influence of private investors. Companies that digitize records “for profit” as Thomas and Johnson discuss, ensure that their product has the upper hand by providing the most amount of information in the most efficient way possible. This was evident through the Cengage representative that spoke during one class. Companies make an extremely large investment through the digitization of archives, and to ensure that such an investment is worthwhile, it is important that there is a market available, and that their resources will be utilized at their maximum potential.
Overall, as discussed in the Weller conclusion, it is important that historians are open to these changes. Although the relationship and logistics between history and technology is relatively unknown, it is imperative that the academic community works with the technology community to ensure cohesion. History, as taken from the Robinson quote in the Weller conclusion, must continue with the “general progress of society”. As a result, it is important to ensure that historical research adapts and utilizes technology to its fullest potential. In fact, this can be related to the use of the Tumblr website. Personally, I enjoyed the Tumblr website. There were many accounts tailored to my interests, and it was easy to navigate and follow these sites. In addition, the use of hashtags and search bars ensured that one was able to find what they were looking for. It is important to note an issue with Tumblr, that is also an issue with online archives, that not all images or documents were authentic. As a result, it is important to remain skeptical with using such sites. As a whole, Tumblr was a great choice because of the vast amount of historical data present on the site. One was able to include documents, images, captions, etc. with ease and efficiency, and you were also able to connect with formal institutions such as the Smithsonian, or simply other accounts that share similar interests. It was a great social network site that served a valuable historical purpose in this class setting.