Ok, I'm ship neutral, so no ship hate, but I have never seen people absolutely denying reality and facts this hard and as a logic loving person I cannot stand this level of delusion.
Lokius shippers might as well argue the earth is flat in the main tags, that's what it feels like to scroll trough this weirdness.
So it's gonna be this one rant post, correctly tagged of course, to vent and then I'll have to blacklist this tag (which I have never done before with any tag, cause nothing was ever this bad) for my sanity.
Sylki is the canon relationship of the show.
Still, even if they've broken up.
So, if Loki is in love, it's with Sylvie.
That's that Isaac Bauman interview.
It is not in any way confirmation of lokius.
(Oh and the rainbow as a symbol of hope and new beginnings passes over everybodys face. Because Loki gives everyone hope. Rainbows did have symbolic meaning before the creation of the pride flag and by denying that, shippers sound like weird ass Karens claiming the fashion industry is pushing the gay agenda by printing rainbows on kids shirts.)
Now next interview, the Kevin Wright one:
He talks about Sylki as a romantic relationship and how much Loki still cares about her, even if there is no time to focus on that, and mentions that Loki was only able to do what he did 'because he cares about her, he cares about Mobius, more than anyone he's ever cared about.' Both of them!
So shippers actually took a Sylki interview to make it about Lokius.
The 'it's about who': there's an Eric Martin interview, where he explains that losing Sylvie was the last straw for Loki and then he started to control his slipping and it was about all of the people he cared about.
Which is logical, since he can slip if he focuses on a person. If it was about Mobius only, how would he end up in the citadel again.
And Loki does a full turn, then looks at the space where the audience would be, but not directly into the camera. Because it is about everyone in that room. Full turn.
Tom calls both Mobius and Sylvie mirrors in an interview.
He uses 'passionate disagreement' for both of them.
He had to be informed about Lokius, because he wasn't aware of it, but is obvi ship neutral/ positive here, because he's a decent human being. That's still no canon confirmation.
Oh and the scrapped ep 5? There's no way it was simply 'romcom-like', as shippers love to imagine, that would have impressed nobody and Marvel already did that with WandaVision, so it would not have been a 'big conceptual swing.
It was most likely about Loki going back to the New York invasion, which is why B 15 is in 2012. Or slipping further back even.
That would not have fit the tone of the show and blewn the budget, so it got axed.
Now my inner virgo feels better.
I can't stand people spreading misinformation, that has actually nothing to do with shipping, but with my fact-loving self.
theartofmadeline
pixelskylines
germansingergirl
kianamaiart
gummygunk
