Mike Driver
YOU ARE THE REASON
Misplaced Lens Cap
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
tannertan36
Stranger Things
Kaledo Art
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
h
almost home
One Nice Bug Per Day
roma★
No title available
dirt enthusiast
Game of Thrones Daily
styofa doing anything
祝日 / Permanent Vacation
ojovivo
Discoholic 🪩
wallacepolsom
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Philippines
seen from New Zealand
seen from United States
seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@lemonlines-blog
"However much in a particular case insistence upon such rules may appear as a technicality that inures to the benefit of a guilty person, the history of the criminal law proves that tolerance of shortcut methods in law enforcement impairs its enduring effectiveness."
dissent of Justice William J. Brennan, Jr. in U.S. v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338
" . . . modern cell phones . . . such a pervasive and insistent part of daily life that the proverbial visitor from Mars might conclude they were an important feature of human anatomy."
Riley v. CA
No. 13-132 and 13-212, 2014 BL 175779 (U.S. June 25, 2014)
"One of the things that upsets me about modern society is the coarseness of manners. You can’t go to a movie—or watch a television show for that matter—without hearing the constant use of the F-word—including, you know, ladies using it. People that I know don’t talk like that! But if you portray it a lot, the society’s going to become that way. It’s very sad."
Antonin Scalia, in an interview with Jennifer Senior, New York Magazine
The majority holds that a judge suffering from dementia may sentence a man to death.
Deere v. Cullen No. 10-99013, D.C. No. 2:92-cv-01684-CAS
"Danger invites rescue. The cry of distress is the summons to relief."
232 NY 176 (1921)
" . . . one man's vulgarity is another's lyric"
Cohen v. California 403 U.S. 15 (1971)
When we take our seats on the bench we are not struck with blindness, and forbidden to know as judges what we see as men [and women].”
Tummino v. Hamburg, No. 12-CV-763 (ERK)(VVP) 4 April 2013
citing Ho Ah Kow v. Nunan, 12 F. Cas. 252, 255 (C.C.D. Cal. 1879)
In a society that abhors censorship and in which policymakers have traditionally placed the highest value on the freedom to communicate, it is unrealistic to conclude that statutory authority to regulate conduct implicitly authorized the Executive to regulate speech.
Stevens dissent Rust v. Sullivan 500 U.S. 173 (1991)
“Thus, even though the act may provide incriminating evidence, a criminal suspect may be compelled . . . to make a recording of his voice.”
United States v. Hubbell 530 U.S. 27, 34–35 (2000), citing United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967).
A peculiarity of the situation is that the parents of this odd creature—the courts—do not realize, despite the labor pains of its birth, that they have brought forth a child. This article is written for the benefit of lawyers and courts of the States that have produced the new offspring, so that they may see that it is a new creature, and that it is ugly and illegitimate and ought promptly to be strangled.
Charles E. Carpenter, 17 S. Cal. L. Rev. 347 (1943-1944)
I have difficulty in concluding, as the Court does, that the right of 'privacy' is involved in this case.
Rehnquist dissent,
Roe v. Wade 410 U.S. 113
I agree with the proposition . . . that no law enforcement agency is required by the First Amendment to permit one of its employees to "ride with the cops and cheer for the robbers."
Rankin v. McPherson 483 U.S. 378 (1987)
"Well—he did not—"
First words uttered by Justice Thomas in oral arguments since Wednesday, February 22, 2006, on Monday, January 14, 2013.
Boyer v. LA
Just as erroneous statements must be protected to give freedom of expression the breathing space it needs to survive, so statements criticizing public policy and the implementation of it must be similarly protected.
Bond v. Floyd 385 U. S. 116, 136 (1966)
A pardon in our days . . . is part of the Constitutional scheme. When granted it is the determination of the ultimate authority that the public welfare will be better served by inflicting less than what the judgment fixed.
Biddle v. Perovich
274 U.S.480, 486 (1927)
There are literally millions of aliens within the jurisdiction of the United States. The Fifth Amendment, as well as the Fourteenth Amendment, protects every one of these persons from deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.
Mathews v. Diaz
426 U.S. 67, 77, 96 S. Ct. 1883, 1890, 48 L. Ed. 2d 478 (1976)
It is locality that is determinative of the application of the Constitution, in such matters as judicial procedure, and not the status of the people who live in it.
Balzac v. Porto Rico
258 U.S. 298, 309, 42 S. Ct. 343, 347, 66 L. Ed. 627 (1922)