Leodude

they/them and it/its, commissions are open. I 'm not from the bird site. Currently on a Flondon kick, so watch out. Stowaways are cool. Dream Stans and WilburSoot fans ain't. I do occasionally reblog 18+, but tag it, and frequently forget to tag gore (apologies) so it might be best to err on the side of caution, minors.

[leochantisallspiders]

Hey! Donate!

If you donate money here and send me proof,

https://gofund.me/27fab415 @wafaaresh6’s gofundme Then I’ll do a commissioned drawing for you. Donate 2 for colour. Busts are 1, full body is two. I don’t do nsft, bigoted stuff, or multiple characters, but I am willing to do mechas. I’m willing to do ocs or fanart. Some of my other work is below the cut.

[smallishmajor]

Ren I dont think you can Say that

[balrogballs]

India, 1960s: When they told him to “dress as his heart desires” to his first gay club night, nobody, least of all Fingon (who spent the present-day equivalent of Rs 50,000 on his own outfit for the evening), expected Comrade Maedhros to borrow a doggy harness off Celegorm’s newest Alsatian and turn up dressed as a “small dachshund wearing a little Lenin hat”, inadvertently influencing global gay culture for decades to come.

happy pride from prayers!au russingon 😌

[fforsythiaaa]

Once when I was in undergrad, someone described something as “problematic” in class and our professor was like, “That’s cool, but ‘problematic’ doesn’t really mean anything. It means that the thing you’re describing has a problem, and in and of itself that’s not bad. Art, especially, should always have problems, or else it’s not interesting and not art, either. It sounds like you’re trying to say that this is bad, but you don’t want to say ‘bad.’ Is that right?”

So from then on whenever one of us called something problematic, he would make us talk it out until we could name the “bad” thing we were hinting at. In this particular class, 7/10 it was some type of oppression, and the remainder was like, “I’m uncomfortable because this is very new/confusing/pushing boundaries that made me feel safe.”

Once we stopped calling things “problematic” and stopping at that, class got way more interesting and... we all had to say, like, “that’s racist” or “that’s misogynistic” or “ew capitalism gross” out loud, which a lot of us had never done in a classroom before. Or we had to be like, “Uhhh... I’m not sure what’s so bad?” and confront our own beliefs and that was maybe even more useful.

Anyway. Whenever I see the word problematic, I can’t help but think of this professor being like, “Good starting point, now let’s get specific.” I think when we have to commit to saying “that’s ___” it requires a lot more careful thought about the truth and impact and complexities of whatever we’re claiming. Sometimes there really is some bullshit afoot, and also sometimes it’s art, and it should be full of problems, because that’s what art is.

[fforsythiaaa]

Once when I was in undergrad, someone described something as “problematic” in class and our professor was like, “That’s cool, but ‘problematic’ doesn’t really mean anything. It means that the thing you’re describing has a problem, and in and of itself that’s not bad. Art, especially, should always have problems, or else it’s not interesting and not art, either. It sounds like you’re trying to say that this is bad, but you don’t want to say ‘bad.’ Is that right?”

So from then on whenever one of us called something problematic, he would make us talk it out until we could name the “bad” thing we were hinting at. In this particular class, 7/10 it was some type of oppression, and the remainder was like, “I’m uncomfortable because this is very new/confusing/pushing boundaries that made me feel safe.”

Once we stopped calling things “problematic” and stopping at that, class got way more interesting and... we all had to say, like, “that’s racist” or “that’s misogynistic” or “ew capitalism gross” out loud, which a lot of us had never done in a classroom before. Or we had to be like, “Uhhh... I’m not sure what’s so bad?” and confront our own beliefs and that was maybe even more useful.

Anyway. Whenever I see the word problematic, I can’t help but think of this professor being like, “Good starting point, now let’s get specific.” I think when we have to commit to saying “that’s ___” it requires a lot more careful thought about the truth and impact and complexities of whatever we’re claiming. Sometimes there really is some bullshit afoot, and also sometimes it’s art, and it should be full of problems, because that’s what art is.

[bad-comic-art]

submitted by @samediankh

[bad-comic-art]

countdown gems

———————————–

submitted by @wondythings​

[leochantisallspiders]

Wonder Woman is fine. Batman…

[bad-comic-art]

Valkyrie Saviors #1 (2021)

[bad-comic-art]

Hyper-Actives (2012)

[bad-comic-art]

Hyper-Actives (2012)

[bad-comic-art]

I uhh have no idea what that giant bulge in the front of MJ’s pants is supposed to be

Spider-Man: Spider’s Shadow #4 (2021)

[bad-comic-art]

another instance of guns shooting entire bullets

Lady Death: Treacherous Infamy #1 (2021)

[bad-comic-art]

owie

(batman eternal #19)

submitted by @honey-dont

[bad-comic-art]

Thoughts?

hmm, bad

submitted by @okyverlo

[bad-comic-art]

Green Lantern Vol. 2 #63, pencils by Jack Sparling

submitted by @jarmes

[bad-comic-art]

Diesel #1 (1997) by Joe Weltjens

Now I feel this is also a fascinating piece because this is indeed a ripoff of the manga series JoJo’s Bizarre Adventure that only got one issue, and just in case someone thinks it’s pure coincidence

————————————————————

submitted by @ps2polpo​

[bad-comic-art]

Invaders #12 (1977)