“Almost every womon I have ever met has a secret belief that she is just on the edge of madness, that there is some deep, crazy part within her, that she must be on guard constantly against ‘losing control’ — of her temper, of her appetite, of her sexuality, of her feelings, of her ambition, of her secret fantasies, of her mind.” ▼ Elana Dykewomon, “Notes for a Magazine,” Sinister Wisdom #36
i really like the definition of “adult human female” because it says “thats all it is. its not femininity, makeup, submissiveness, softness, anything. all it is is biology. the rest is up to the individual”
Protecting children from pedos is now “Puritan sex negativity” according to a pedo transwoman .
Berkeley Police allowed a suspected pedophile to walk away from a sting conducted by predator hunters despite being shown evidence that he h
Berkeley Police allowed a suspected pedophile to walk away from a sting conducted by predator hunters despite being shown evidence that he had been expressing interest in molesting multiple children, including an infant.
On August 20, anti-pedophile vigilante group Predator Poachers uploaded footage of a sting they conducted in Berkeley, California to YouTube involving a trans-identified male who had been purportedly seeking to meet a 9-year-old for the purposes of sexually abusing her.
The girl was in fact a decoy established by the group as part of a months-long investigation into the man, who went by the name Sophia Westfall.
Speaking to Reduxx, predator hunter Alex Rosen says Westfall first contacted the decoy’s Instagram account in April, and soon after began initiating sexual conversations with the child.
Rosen is a full-time anti-pedophile vigilante, and he and his small team have traveled across the United States conducting stings on predators since 2019. Ample evidence is gathered prior to a confrontation, and police are then called.
Rosen told Reduxx that the sting uploaded on the 20th had actually been conducted on June 7 when he and his team were in California.
“Sophia was one of the reasons we were in California but we actually had multiple suspects in the state,” he explained, noting that Sophia had been picked up by two different decoys on two different platforms — Instagram and Telegram. Rosen says both decoy accounts had been populated using altered and AI-generated photos.
Rosen provided Reduxx a number of screenshots belonging to conversations Westfall had with the decoy. Westfall tells the girl that he masturbates to thoughts about her, and suggests a number of ways he wants to molest her.
“I’m thinking of other things too, but maybe tickles too,” Westfell wrote in one message, “Kisses and touches all over. Kisses between your legs especially!”
Disturbingly, Westfall suggested that he wanted to sexually abuse the girl’s 6-year-old sister, saying “well, you know I love young girls. I’m just excited thinking how fun it could be to play in bed with both of you!”
The decoy then advised Westfall she also had a 1 year old sibling, stating “
she’s probably too young” for sexual activity, to which Westfall replied: “That doesn’t bother me. Never too young to start learning!”
While Westfall would ultimately establish a meet up with the decoy purporting to be 9-years-old, he also communicated with a separate one of Rosen’s decoys on encrypted chat service Telegram. That decoy was also intended to be a 9-year-old girl.
“He sent some very illegal stuff to our decoy on Telegram,” Rosen says, noting that it included extreme child sexual abuse material appearing to show very young children being sexually assaulted. Westfall also gave suggestions to that 9-year-old decoy on how to pleasure male genitals.
“Some people like stroking a hand up and down over it… or you can wrap your mouth around the tip and lick or suck,” Westfall says, continuing: “It can absolutely be exciting.”
The filmed confrontation took place at Strawberry Creek Park in Berkeley, where Westfall thought he would be meeting with the 9-year-old he had been interacting with on Instagram. Instead, Rosen and his team showed up with a bundle of evidence they had printed off.
In the dramatic video Rosen uploaded to YouTube on the 20th, Westfall is seen wearing knee-high-boots, a skirt, a pink top and a hat littered with trans pride flag buttons. He immediately attempts to walk away from Rosen when he is confronted, and is even defended by unknowing locals in the park who believe he is in need of assistance.
Westfall continuously says “leave me alone,” and “I don’t want to talk to you,” while hiding his face behind a medical mask. He refuses to answer any of Rosen’s questions, and simply paces across the park repeatedly.
At one point, the police show up — apparently called by bystanders who believed Rosen was harassing an innocent individual.
Rosen is seen trying to show police his bundle of evidence, and explains to multiple officers what his investigation had uncovered. But, disturbingly, police do not detain Westfall, and allow him to leave the park — which is full of children — without resistance.
Rosen tells Reduxx he was shocked by that decision.
“Based on what we showed them … It should have been an instant arrest. Especially with the lewd [images] he had sent. I have never had a predator who was trying to molest a 1-year-old, and unfortunately there have been a few, that was not arrested on the spot.” Rosen says, “[Police] said they needed to gather more evidence and check with the District Attorney. But a place like Berkeley, like New York City, they are known for not locking up criminals.”
Predator Poachers, Rosen’s team of anti-pedophile vigilantes, says they had calculated for a poor police response due to the location of the sting, but they had still been confident an arrest was going to be made because the evidence was damning.
“I was well-aware that I was doing this catch in Berkeley, and I knew what that meant for cop response. But I thought even then… this is just too bad that cops are going to make an arrest. I was that confident. Especially with [the suspect] sending my decoy child sexual abuse material. But I was wrong, sadly.”
Rosen also notes that Police had expressed frustration with him when he “misgendered” the suspect.
Predator Poachers has successfully initiated arrests in multiple states, and that 80% of the other suspects he had confronted in California had been arrested the day of his stings or in the days after he spoke to police, but Westfall still has not been charged with any crime.
“This person said they wanted to molest a 1-year-old. They sent child sexual abuse material on Telegram. There was horrific, horrific sh*t. All I can say is, we’ve gotten people arrested for a lot less.”
Reduxx reached out to the Berkeley Police Department, which did confirm it had an open case number related to the incident, and suggested the matter was still under investigation.
While Westfall deleted the Instagram profile he used to contact the 9-year-old decoy, he has an additional account on the platform. While it is now defunct, the profile was primarily focused on taking photos of women in public without their consent.
Westfall often placed extremely sexual captions beside the stealth images, and even featured photos of what appeared to be young girls he had taken.
On Twitter, Westfall is still active and posting. Amongst retweets of pornography, Westfall engages with trans activists and sometimes speaks on trans-related issues. The day after the sting, Westfall retweeted a post arguing it was “puritan sex negativity” to try and argue “drag and queerness” wasn’t inherently sexual.
His profile features a link to a defunct WordPress blog he maintained titled SaphikoSophia.
In 2015, Westfall made a post to the blog in which he praised a book titled The Perils of Protecting Children from Sex.
The right downplays misogyny from boys as "boys being boys 😏"
The left downplays misogyny from boys as "it's the toxic masculinity 🥺"
In both scenarios boys aren't directly held accountable for their actions and the women + girls they abuse are seen as passive objects for male character development.
I’ve volunteered at our local senior center for years, and once I’d gotten to know the women who came, I’d eventually ask about their husbands, and they’d confide to me that they felt like a nurse, not a wife, because he expected to be waited on hand and foot, three hot meals a day, his medicine handed to him exactly when he needed to take it, her to make all his appointments. And I’d suggest, oh, they have those pill bottles that tell you when you last took your medicine, there are these services for seniors to help get you to appointments, I can sign you up for meals on wheels!
And they’d say, no, it wasn’t that he couldn’t manage his own appointments or pills or dinner, because he’d done it for years, but he stopped when they moved in together/got married/bought a house/had a kid/two kids. A woman told me she dated a man for years, had a child with him, got pregnant again, moved across the country for his job - and the second she had no job, no nearby family, a toddler, and a newborn, his personality did an immediate 180. I heard this story from every woman, the only difference was when it occurred. After marriage? The first kid? The second? When did he feel like she was in too deep to divorce him, and stop pretending to give a fuck about her?
So I started gently inquiring with middle-aged women and younger, trying to figure it out. And they all described the same thing. Some of them were bewildered, trying to fix it, thinking it was temporary. I met a woman who described her husband’s “postpartum depression”, which involved him reneging on his promise to take paternity leave, laying around when he was home, accepting every offer of work travel he could, and yelling at her constantly. Five years later, his “PPD” is still going strong. One woman wistfully told me about how they used to go grocery shopping together and cook a delicious meal together for them and their kid, but when he got a job across the country and they moved, he stopped helping and she became responsible for cooking all meals, or he’d feed their kid a microwave quesadilla for dinner every night. I know a childfree woman who separated from her husband because he started dumping all the chores on her, but went back to him when he promised to fix it and started acting like when they were dating. And then five years later, once they’d bought a vacation home together and were renting it out, he immediately struck again. Only this time, divorcing him was going to be such a financial tangle that she just decided to suck it up and pick up his socks for the rest of their marriage.
There was one single man who came to the senior center with his wife, doted on her, was an absolute Prince Charming until the end. He was so endlessly kind and adoring with his wife, she raved about him. They would look through the classes we offered, each circle on their own pamphlet the ones they wanted to do, and then do the ones they both circled, and he would peek over her shoulder to circle the ones she did - we all knew it, and it was hugely adorable.
Then she died, and he tried to alter her will to give her family farm that she’d inherited from her mother to their son instead of their daughter, who had been running it for years.
And after all these stories, I kind of just had to accept it. All of these women were intelligent, and aware of male violence, had vetted the men they were dating, and thought they were getting a good one. Literally making the same mistake as their mothers, over and over again, because they thought, “well, I checked him out! I dated him for years before we got married/had a kid! I lived with him, I know what he’s like! I looked for red flags!” not realizing that, yeah, so did lots of women.
But the problem is, we’re not talking to each other enough, so every woman is evaluating her relationship under the assumption that he will continue to act the same way he’s acting right then. Which makes sense, but doesn’t seem to be a good predictor of behavior in men. Every single woman would tell me, “oh, he turned out just like his dad, you have to look at the dad,” “it’s because he went to vietnam, I shouldn’t have married someone who went to war, “it’s because his mom did all the chores, you have to look at the mom,” “his parents were abusive, you have to marry a man who goes to therapy,” “i think he didn’t really want kids and was just going along with me, you have to make sure the guy suggests kids first,” and they were blaming themselves for not being able to see it - although, as far as I could tell, it was pretty universal.
And I had to accept that I was not smarter than them, I didn’t have any innate talent for reading people that they didn’t, there was no secret red flag, and I wasn’t going to do any better at vetting men than they did. I find it confusing, that men can put on a mask for years. I couldn’t do that, it would be literally impossible. But all my evidence suggests that many men are capable of this, and many women aren’t great at seeing through it. So why would I even bother? I don’t find it to be worth my time to invest in a relationship that has a countdown clock on it. I don’t want to put in the time to bond with a façade. I have like. real shit to do.
i mean i agree but breasts will always be sexualized? they're sexually attractive to anyone attracted to women. people just need to learn to behave around them. it's not like men's chests are seen as sexually unattractive either.
not true. in many cultures, and further back in our culture, the breasts are/were not sexualised, objects for sexual arousal. they are organs designed to produce milk for babies. clothing would be worn with breasts uncovered, and no sexual emotions attributed to them. i remember a documentary where a european man told some men in an african tribe, where the women were topless, about how breasts are covered because they’re seen as sexual in western culture, and the african men laughed and said something to the degree of ‘are white men babies, why are they wanting breasts like that?’
don’t assume that because something is the way it is now, that 1. it’s always been like that and 2. it’s nature, not nurture. in my view, breasts should be treated like lips and hands; non sexual 99% of the time, as they serve a non sexual main function, but can be sexual in sexual situations. we use mouths for kissing and oral, we find lips attractive, that doesn’t mean we see them sexually in normal situations, or demand that they be covered. men tried that with ‘blow job lips’ comments, but women shut that shit down.
I’m a medical student and when we were learning about physical exam techniques and got to the heart exam the consequences of treating breasts like sexual objects for the purpose of pleasing others became VERY apparent.
People were freaking out about performing cardiac exams on female patients. One man in the class nervously asked, “ but what do we do about … yknow?” when it came to stethoscope placement because the best way to hear sounds from the mitral valve requires placing the stethoscope kind of under and up someone’s breast. And while there were zero questions or concerns about performing cardiac exams on men, performing cardiac exams on women was suddenly a big issue no one wanted to do because even though thesteps were exactly the same between men and women, in women it was suddenly a “sexual” exam like pelvic or testicular exams. And it didn’t help that 100% of our textbook and lecture PowerPoints used for stethoscope placement only showed men.
And then I thought about it and remembered the time I was seen by a male cardiologist who only used stethoscope placements higher up on my chest and didn’t listen to the mitral valve, and concluded that because he didn’t hear any murmurs my echocardiogram could be delayed a few months. As you can probably guess, the echo showed mitral valve prolapse which would have been heard if he’d listened to the mitral valve. Which he didn’t because it involved lifting and touching my breast. Which he didn’t do because breasts have been unnecessarily sexualized. And based on the other medical students in my class, that is not going to change any time soon.
On a similar note, I once was interested in the idea of walking outside barefoot for health reasons but I had to stop because a male neighbor told me I was “turning people on.” Aka, foot fetishists were sexualizing a non-sexual part of my body the way breasts are sexualized. I’m just so tired of my body being regulated based on male perversions.
People be like. Wealthy women might be able to get abortions by travelling thousands of miles, paying bribes, and living in fear of the cause of their trip being discovered. Hence they are not oppressed ❌ I am very intelligent 🧠
not to sound like a prey animal on main but i feel like too many people, men and women both, do not actually understand the extent of the strength difference between men and women. it is actually surprisingly easy for a man to kill a woman, in fact it can be done accidentally
The only people who deny it are either blinded by ideology, or have never wrestled with someone of the opposite sex. I had a girlfriend who was extremely athletic, but had only ever played on all-female teams, and her little brothers were very young so she could throw them around. I'm 6' 4", and she honestly thought she could hold her own against me.
My wife is a genuine bruiser. She is strong as fuck and did wrestling and roller derby back in the day. She once thought she could take me wrestling. I suggested we leg wrestle as a test run. It was no more effort than putting my leg down. To be fair to her, I would prefer not to take a punch from her, but any physical fight between us would be absurdly lopsided.
When I was dating a man a head shorter than me I had been a casual athlete most of my life. I had abs, I won ribbons and medals, I was fit for my age and weight.
He was not an athlete, he was in choir and played bass guitar and piano, but he was stronger than me because, despite his size and lack of physical activity, he still had bone density and muscle mass on his side, he was still male.
When I dated a man larger than me he got drunk and hugged me a little too tightly a little too long. I tired to get away and couldn't escape. I realized then he could kill me. Not just hurt me, but kill me. He could kill me without much effort and I could do nothing about it.
I never forgot that, I never forgot the primal fear of being trapped. Not everyone experiences it first hand, not everyone thinks about it, but it is real.
When I was in female self defense class we were taught to do whatever you had to in order to get away from your attacker. One girl, my age at the time, asked why don't we stay and fight so we can turn our attackers into the authorities. Another woman asked "what if we don't feel comfortable hurting our attacker"... Sometimes, by the time you realize it then it is too late. You have the disadvantage; there is no fighting dirty when you are fighting for your life.
I think every woman eventually has that moment of sick realization that even an out of shape, short or skinny man can easily physically overpower them.
Mine was in a frat party basement when a random guy grabbed me and hugged me too hard, refusing to let go until I kissed him. And I’m that moment, I realized I couldn’t even move a little bit much less get away. It’s terrifying.
i am pleading on my knees for every woman to become comfortable and instinctive with the idea of kicking, kneeing, punching, and otherwise brutalizing men in the nads. it is the cheat code God gave us.
also, ive been attacked by a man and won because i was 50 pounds heavier than him, so im unsure about the claim that a beefy chubby hunk of a woman is defenseless against a scrawny short dude. that said the threat is real, the deck is stacked, and men should not be playing women's sports.
but nothing is unpossible! refuse to live in fear! kick guys in the balls remorselessly. they refuse to do it to each other because it's that bad!
growing up a girl letting people do things to you for years and years and years means your anger will turn biblical. anger that is incoherent unidentifiable inconsolable
“In 2006 I took part in a discussion for men who were attempting to address issues of men’s violence against women. Toward the end of the event, men began sharing why they had been moved to get involved. One young man spoke emotionally of dealing with the rape of his female partner by a mutual friend. Her body and rights, and their trust in a friend, had been savagely violated. He wanted to make sense of the assault without re-creating the cycle of violence. He wanted to support his partner and find support for himself. He wanted, much more broadly, to eradicate rape culture. He began reading widely and thinking deeply as part of these efforts, and he began to realize his own role in perpetuating the problem. He said: ‘I’ve never raped a woman, and I’ve never even been in a fight. I strive to treat women with dignity and respect. But I’ve realized that rape is in me. It’s in the way I look at women walking down the street. It’s in the music I listen to and the movies I watch. It’s in the games that I play. It’s in me. And I don’t want it there.’ What this man had realized is that although individual cases of rape are perpetrated by individuals or groups of individuals, the systematic targeting of women and girls for sexual assault is supported by the imagery and belief systems of our wider culture. That culture is the water we’re swimming in, and he was starting to realize that it was toxic … Rape is in me. That’s a powerful realization.”
The fact that the man’s friends hid these secrets from her and never reported him to the police, just shows how men support other men if they did heinous crimes but never a woman as the victim.
dededos
snowghoul
theartofmadeline
2087
germansingergirl
stormborns
blakekathryn
