Clinton is dead. The Dark Lord has taken power. Pure bloods rejoice again. The House, Senate and...
A mashup of an angry liberal blog and an angry Harry Potter blog.

PR's Tumblrdome
macklin celebrini has autism

shark vs the universe
★
$LAYYYTER
untitled

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
EXPECTATIONS
Sade Olutola

Product Placement

pixel skylines
The Bright Sessions
Not today Justin
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
NASA
Doug Jones

tannertan36
Mike Driver
Color Me Curious

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
seen from Ecuador
seen from United States
seen from Myanmar (Burma)
seen from Colombia

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Finland
seen from United States
seen from T1
seen from United States

seen from Netherlands
seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Romania
seen from United States
seen from United States
@liberalmindedscum-blog
Clinton is dead. The Dark Lord has taken power. Pure bloods rejoice again. The House, Senate and...
A mashup of an angry liberal blog and an angry Harry Potter blog.
In which Layne lays down the truth of our generation while simultaneously dragging this Trump Supporter
Harry may not be a full-on patronus against the presumptive Republican presidential nominee’s appeal, but reading Potter stories does appear to be a shield charm against Trump’s message. A new study to be published in a special 2016 election issue of PS: Political Science and Politics finds that reading Harry Potter books leads Americans to …
Interestingly, the movies don’t have the same effect. The nuance in the books is key.
To all the people feeling defeated, I’d like to quote Luna Lovegood: “We’re all still here, we’re still fighting.”
This Harry Potter quote has stuck with me more than any others over the years, and it’s my light today.
Clinton is dead. The Dark Lord has taken power. Pure bloods rejoice again. The House, Senate and...
A mashup of an angry liberal blog and an angry Harry Potter blog.
Sen. Bernie Sanders, whose presidential campaign won 22 states and 13 million votes before losing the nomination to Hillary Clinton, is laying out his agenda in his new book, "Our Revolution: A Future to Believe In." The Vermont senator joins "CBS This Morning" to discuss why he thinks Democrats failed to appeal to the working class in the 2016 election.
We have to be more focused and united in 2020. This is a party for all people and we need to communicate that. Debbie and Hillary won’t touch our primaries then, no reason to not start supporting your candidate now. It might not be Bernie, and that’s fine. We just need solid leaders to choose from, start picking shining stars.
Current mood.
The end of the Republican Party made possible by their weak leaders.
Paul Ryan is inept, incapable of hard work.
This Is True!
Phroyd
In an election with the potential to give America its first female president, an outcome both they and I long to see, they have cast their primary votes for Bernie Sanders. The decision comes down to a choice between two undeniable goods: a symbolic victory for “women everywhere,” or a measurably better life for those women consigned to nowhere. The person who watched my daughter when she was small so my wife and I could pursue our careers, the person who helps my elderly mother bathe, the people who cash my checks at the bank, take my cash at the store, wait my table, cut my hair, change my hotel sheets — all of them are women. A visitor from another planet who didn’t know about lactation might assume breasts were human insignia for underpaid service. Many of the women who do these jobs earn no more than a paltry minimum wage. Man does not live by bread alone, but working-class women are expected to live by acknowledgment: a rose on Mother’s Day, a folded flag at a son’s funeral, a woman in the Oval Office in 2017. A president who spares his opposition the trouble of branding him a socialist because he’s happy to own the brand.
Some people will insist that only a woman can say what I’m about to say. Probably most of them will vote for Hillary Clinton. Probably most of them should.
My wife and daughter have taken a different course. In an election with the potential to give America its first female president, an outcome both they and I long to see, they have cast their primary votes for Bernie Sanders. I’m hoping the women who vote in the California primary will do the same. They’ll be casting a strong vote for women if they do.
The decision comes down to a choice between two undeniable goods: a symbolic victory for “women everywhere,” or a measurably better life for those women consigned to nowhere.
I don’t have to be female to recognize who those women are. The person who watched my daughter when she was small so my wife and I could pursue our careers, the person who helps my elderly mother bathe, the people who cash my checks at the bank, take my cash at the store, wait my table, cut my hair, change my hotel sheets — all of them are women. A visitor from another planet who didn’t know about lactation might assume breasts were human insignia for underpaid service.
Many of the women who do these jobs earn no more than a paltry minimum wage. Many of them have no paid sick days or pensions. They cannot count on their children going to a functional elementary school, much less to an accredited college. Yes, their daughters can dream of becoming president; their daughters can also dream of taking wing and flying to the moon.
These are not the women who break glass ceilings; these are the women who are summoned to sweep up the shards. They don’t “lean in”; they bend down, often for little more than a pat on the back. Man does not live by bread alone, but working-class women are expected to live by acknowledgment: a rose on Mother’s Day, a folded flag at a son’s funeral, a woman in the Oval Office in 2017.
Women like these don’t need a president who looks like them so much as a president who fights for them. They need a president willing to take on Wall Street, militarism, and the billionaire class. A president who spares his opposition the trouble of branding him a socialist because he’s happy to own the brand. If some of these women wince at being called feminists, then they also need his example.
We lay so much emphasis on having a first female president that we fail to envision our best female president. She may be standing on a street corner even now. Her leadership in a time of crisis, her radical commitment to government “of the people, by the people, and for the people” — not least of all her roots among the working poor — will prompt comparisons with Lincoln. In time, historians may think it better to compare Lincoln with her.
The election of either Sanders or Clinton would undoubtedly ease that extraordinary woman’s passage to the White House. Our question in 2016 is this: Whose election would ease it more?
Garret Keizer is a freelance writer.
Phroyd
Seen in West Virginia
Logical
Phroyd
how and when to vote for Bernie in California
Fuck everyone, VOTE BERNIE