lovingjdepp

including but not limited to Johnny Depp. PS. what I love has nothing to do with any discussions or arguments. If you can't come up with any fact, then leave. Don't use my interests against me.

[theroseinthedarkness]

If you still believe Amber after recent audios and all the evidence that Johnny has, you're just trash human being. And stop calling yourself a feminist, because you don't deserve it.

She admitted her OWN plan and you're still believing her because "ShE IS A woMaN". And no, we are not idiots.

[gratefulforjohnnydepp]

We live in a society where a one hour confession of a woman physically abusing her husband while emotionally and verbally abusing him and making homophobic comments isn’t enough proof for some people that she was abusive

[reineyelah-deactivated20200302]

Lord, Lord, Lord...

Oooooook, I am going to number the paragraphs, 1 through 7. I will respond to them by number.

@hundondestiny​

Starting with #1. 

I have, in fact, looked through the reports of the abuse. I have read every single court document. I would wager that I actually know more about this case than you do, since I have been researching it and following it since it broke in May, 2016. You claim that it is all “easily researched online” yet…you have apparently failed to do any adequate research at all. Let me guess, you think “research” is googling “Amber Heard abuse victim”, selecting the first two websites that come up, and using those as your only sources?

Newsflash, that is not how research works. So, in conclusion, I am absolutely going to “open my mouth”.

Also, Amber Heard being bi (I don’t even think she is), is irrelevant to any conversation. 

#2.

I don’t know why you bothered to mention any of this. Her age, his age, her status, his status, it is all irrelevant. 

#3.

Ok, we have found your first factual inaccuracy. Amber Heard did not initially file for divorce on the grounds of domestic violence. Number one, she is not the one who intended to file first in the first place. Johnny was going to. He left her first. If you recall, in the tape, he says that if he walks out again, he means to divorce her. He walked out on the night of April 21st, the same night that she took a shit in his bed. 

She filed on the grounds of irreconcilable differences. It was only AFTER Johnny failed to give into the demands of this letter did she change her filing grounds. 

In case you are confused, this is an extortion letter sent to Johnny’s attorney’s on behalf of Amber. In it, she demands that she receive a Range Rover, three condos in the Eastern Columbia Building (where they lived), 50 thousand a month in spousal support, and paid legal fees. If she didn’t get all of that, she was going to claim domestic violence and go to the media with said claim. 

Johnny refused, and guess what appeared in People Magazine days later:

That. That appeared in the magazine, written by a friend of hers. She sold these photos of her to the magazine. Her evidence was sold to a tabloid. Think about that. 

Your other factual inaccuracy: her 7 million dollars was not a “settlement”, as in she won that money from Johnny because of winning any sort of court case. It was a divorce settlement that she was entitled to under California divorce law. She would have gotten that money regardless. Also, neither the ACLU or Children’s Hospital have ever confirmed that Amber Heard donated her full promised amount to them. 

#3.  

This was not back in 2017…honestly, you act like you are so knowledgeable, but you can’t even get the year right. The divorce was finalized in 2017, yes, but everything you just described before this happened in 2016. And as I said, there isn’t any confirmation that she donated all that money, so it doesn’t belong in a timeline. 

“She has not publicly made a show about the marriage or the abuse allegations.”

GIRL. She has built her entire career since on those allegations. Every single interview she mentions them, or how she is a survivor…she is being sued at the moment because she mentioned them in her Washington Post article. She has done speeches (like her most recent Women’s March outing), she has read letters on stage…this is embarrassing. Her “activism” is all paid-for PR to help her image, which you would know if you knew that she hired several well-known charity connectors to help her out. Beyond that, she has, in fact, done domestic abuse activism. She hasn’t moved on from shit…if you failed to notice, when she responded to Depp’s initial defamation filing, she included like 20 pages of new allegations…that she didn’t need. She did not need to include those, but she did anyway. 

#4.

The first point I will make is that Johnny DID produce evidence in the 2016 court case, but like an actual abuse victim, when Amber decided to drop the case, he chose not to pursue it further, since he didn’t want a court case to begin with. It was only after she harassed him for three years that he finally decided to sue her. 

I will provide his original evidence list for you. 

First of all, the audio that was released wasn’t even submitted in the defamation case, it was submitted in the Sun case. Beyond that, I’m not sure why it matters when the audio was released. The fact remains that it proves, beyond a shadow of a doubt who the aggressor was in that relationship. Presumably, Johnny avoided using evidence like this until he felt like he had no other choice…because he is still trying to protect her. 

#5.

 I will provide the full audio in its entirety for you here:

A few things you should note. 

She shames him the entire video for wanting to leave when she gets violent. 

She is the only one raising her voice and insulting him. 

She belittles him. 

She tries to downplay how she hit him. 

Everyone has accepted that she is the real abuser because in this tape, she is the only one who is acting like an abuser…and with all of his other evidence (like his 42 witnesses, photographs, texts etc.) no one can deny that she abused him. She is a narcissistic abuser who has been trying to blame all of her actions on her victim for three years. 

He threw something at her because she was pelting him first with shit. Also, may I remind you that Amber said something similar in her 2016 deposition. The only time she ever claims she “hit Johnny” was when she was “protecting her sister”. But in this tape, she admits to hitting him more. That is just one lie in her vast sea of lies. 

She didn’t hit back. She hit first. Many, many, many times. She even states, to Johnny, that HE hits back. And he clarifies and says that he pushes her away from him when she is hitting him. 

Let me remind you again that the man you are accusing of abuse chose to leave every time they got into any kind of fight…does that sound like an abuser to you?

#6. 

Yes, the narrative has changed…but not entirely. It is just now people are seeing his side of the story, and they are noticing that it makes a lot more sense than her side of the story. They are seeing through her lies now. Starting with the photographs she submitted for her temporary restraining order. First, you should be aware of how easy it is to obtain one of these. A woman managed to get one against David Letterman when she had never even met the man. Second, none of these photographs had metadata. This means that she had no proof of when or where they were taken. 

This is necessary if you wish to prove abuse. (By the way, his photographs DO have metadata.)

The only evidence that was ever “presented to the public”…meaning in People Magazine, was those worthless photographs. Furthermore, none of her photographs remotely match the horrific events that she describes. I will give you an example. 

This is what she claimed happened on December 15th, 2015:

You will notice that she claims the following:

He slapped her

He dragged her around by the hair

He nearly broke her nose by headbutting her

He tried to strangle her

Threw things at her

These events should have put her in the hospital. 

BUT, that is not where she was the next day. The first thing she did is spend much of the day with her stylist, Samantha McMillen:

She was spending time with her stylist because she was being styled for the James Corden show…which was taping that night. And what did she look like during this taping? Well, I’ll show you.

Despite being a little tired, she looks completely fine to me…certainly not like she had been brutally beaten like 15 hours before…

The fact that you can’t see beyond your “wahhhh bi women wahhhh” lens tells me that you only want to care about female victims who put their evidence in tabloids, demand case dismissal three times, produce no evidence in said trial, abuse other people besides Johnny Depp…..yikes. 

The fact that a looooooooot of people are seeing that he is the victim now must really piss you off huh? Truth hurts. 

While I have you here, let me give you some other resources:

Also, here is this wonderful resource:

https://twitter.com/queenbpip/status/1147267615678717953?s=20

Good day, abuser apologist. 

[silent-pirate-hunter]

If I see one more post about everyone hating on Amber for being an abusive piece of shit being biphobic I will start blocking

I swear to god people are being denser then fucking neuron stars on purpose because you can’t listen to a single clip of that audio recording where she admits to pelting Johnny with pots and pans, vases and other heavy objects, calls him a ‘fucking pussy’ for walking away from her when she gets violent, and states clearly that she won’t promise she won’t get physical with him again and think everyone that’s disgusted is fucking biphobic

Her being a bisexual woman doesn’t fucking excuse her from being an abusvive piece of shit. I don’t give a free pass to anyone to be an asshole let alone use my own sexuality as a shield to be an asshole

[gratefulforjohnnydepp]

Double standards be like:

Amber Heard: claims she was abused 

–> Is instantly believed, becomes ambassador for UN, ACLU and L’oreal. Johnny Depp and his family get death threads and he loses part in POTC

Johnny Depp: claims to be abused and has got scars, cctv footage, audio tapes, photos, text-messages, witnesses (incl police and doctors) to proof it

People: not sure what to believe/well it was mutual abuse/it’s none of our business/she was acting in self-defense/he’s a man he can’t get abused/people don’t believe her because she is bi

40% of the victims of abuse are men. Most of them are afraid to come forward or seek help/support. Wonder why?

[hohslop]

I’ll never forget the time y’all crucified Johnny Depp because Amber Heard accused him for abusing her but now since we found out that Heard was the one abusing Depp this entire time, I’m literally hearing crickets. What the fuck. Men can also be victims of abuse and I don’t know why it’s so hard for some of y’all to understand that.

[null507]

Because that didn’t happen. The legal documents they both signed said neither party made false claims. Johnny Depp was abusing Amber Heard, she did not lie about that. A Johnny Depp fan account later claimed without evidence that they were mutually abusive to each other.

[lovingjdepp]

And A statement for the press is not even the legal document. There’s no such legal document exists. It’s a statement for the press. You just dob’t wanna believe that Amber Heard can be an abuser because she has a vagina. Gross.

[lovingjdepp]

Lol at those who are still trying to make an excuse for Amber Heard just because she’s a woman or because she’s bi. Especially, for the latter reason.

Because if you listen to the 40-minutes tape, she said some homophobic thing to mock him when he called Travis for help.

That he can run away together, that he can jerk Travis off, etc. And you guys still defend her because she’s bi? Lol you’re a lost cause just like her.

[thewolveswithin]

Johnny Depp didn’t attack a crew member

A masterpost if you will about Johnny Depp’s innocence in the City of Lies matter. He got falsely accused of violence and then global roads used it as an excuse to postpone the film, while actually there was no violence and global road pushed the film because of financial problems and more. Johnny will defend his innocence in court about the ‘attack’ and global road is being sued for their bs

First articles with statements from people who were there, lawyers and people who worked on the project:

Film director Brad Furman has jumped to the defence of the star of his upcoming film, Johnny Depp, Brad has issued a statement insisting that claims from Page Six Johnny “attacked” a location manager, even attempting to throw a punch, are totally false.He insisted (via Metro): “Johnny Depp is a consummate professional, great collaborator and a supporter of other artists.“He always treats the crew and people around him with the utmost respect. Movies can be stressful, and non-events often become exaggerated.”The director concluded: “We all love stories — there isn’t one here.”

https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/johnny-depp-set-attack-brad-furman_uk_5af16b88e4b041fd2d2a8403?guccounter=1

Crew members who were there insist it never escalated beyond a verbal confrontation and no punches were ever thrown.

“They had a little moment, there weren’t punches, there wasn’t anything, just were in each others’ face for a second,” script supervisor Emma Danoff, who was sitting next to Depp when the alleged altercation began, told The Daily Beast. “We shot for maybe another hour-and-a-half after that, we went inside. We finished and the locations guy came up to Johnny and they hugged and it was all cute and that was it.”

Three other crew members who spoke to The Daily Beast support Danoff’s recollection.

Depp’s lawyer, Adam Waldman, issued the following statement to The Daily Beast: “Despite false media reports suggesting otherwise, Johnny Depp never touched the person suing him, as over a dozen witnesses present will attest. In a court filing we have generally denied all claims and we will fight these latest sham allegations.”

Yet, whatever did or did not happen between Depp and Brooks, City of Lies director Brad Furman sees the distinct possibility of darker forces at work to kill his movie.

The film’s release was officially shelved on July 19, according to industry data collected by RenTrak. Furman told The Daily Beast he didn’t learn of the decision until the beginning of August during a conference call with Global Road executives, who he says informed him that “they had spoken to Johnny Depp’s people at CAA and that his agents were in accord with this course of action and that a Johnny Depp movie at this time was not releasable.” But when Furman “started talking to people and doing my own due diligence, I realized that Johnny Depp’s team, including his point agent, including his sister who is his manager, none of them had heard anything about the push of the release.”

Sullivan believes that these same political pressures may have contributed to the postponement of the release of City of Lies, adding, “I think Johnny is being made a scapegoat and frankly, it pisses me off.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/inside-the-shocking-death-of-johnny-depps-biggie-murder-movie-city-of-lies?via=twitter_page

Script supervisor Emma Danoff on Monday submitted a declaration stating that she witnessed the altercation and it was nothing like what Brooks described in his lawsuit.

Danoff says they were shooting outside and Brooks berated an African-American homeless woman with “racial and derogatory slurs” because she was in his way. Depp was sitting next to her about 25 feet away when it happened.

“He immediately stood up from our shared seat on the edge of a planter bench and went over to Brooks to stand up for the woman,” Danoff says. “Mr. Depp said to Mr. Brooks, ‘You can’t talk to her like that. You think she is something less than you? Who do you think you are? How dare you?’”

Danoff says there were no punches thrown and no offer of $100,000 for Brooks to punch Depp — and she says she has 40 time-stamped photos that prove it.

“Mr. Brooks, and others who have abused Mr. Depp, are about to discover the consequences for making false accusations,” says Depp’s attorney Adam Waldman.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/city-lies-script-supervisor-defends-johnny-depp-lawsuit-alleged-set-attack-1137854

In the suit, the bank alleges that Global Road used Depp’s off-screen issues as an excuse for its own failure to release the film.

“Any such statement would have been false because the real reason Open Road would not release the Picture is because Open Road and Global Road are in financial distress and decided not to pay the $10,000,000 of marketing and distribution expenses Open Road committed to pay,” the suit alleges.

https://variety.com/2018/biz/news/global-road-city-of-lies-miramax-lawsuit-1202921537/

The man who sued Johnny Depp for allegedly punching him on a film set blew off a court hearing this week and now faces possible sanctions by the court.

On November 6, a scheduled court hearing went down in Los Angeles Court where both parties were supposed to appear. According to court documents, Depp’s lawyer was present for the hearing but Gregg “Rocky” Brooks and his lawyer failed to show up.

The judge set a hearing for next month to determine if he will punish Brooks for not showing up, meaning he could be hit with monetary sanctions or could risk having his entire case dismissed.

https://theblast.com/johnny-depp-alleged-assault-victim-blows-off-court/

All of the claims made by the location manager are absurd. We will prove that as we fight this case.— What Johnny Depp’s attorney has to say about the allegations made by a local manager

https://people.com/movies/johnny-depp-notorious-big-movie-pulled/

The crew member who is suing Johnny Depp over an alleged film set beatdown has dropped the movie’s director from the legal battle.

According to court documents obtained by The Blast, the crew member, Gregg “Rocky” Brooks, is dismissing “City of Lies” director Brad Furman from the case, leaving Depp and his production company as the sole defendants.

He also dropped parts of his lawsuit against Depp but is still pursuing his claim of assault and battery against the actor.

https://theblast.com/johnny-depp-alleged-assault-victim-drops-director/

secondly, the inconsistencies in the claims in the court doc

full doc is here: https://pmcdeadline2.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/depp-complaint-wm.pdf (note, these docs don’t present the current case anymore, because plaintiff dropped the case against all the defendants except Johnny, so only those claims need attention) 

“you have no right to tell me what to do” only he hadn’t told him anything yet. he didn’t even know he was going to talk to him. he says that before he said something to Johnny, Johnny started screaming at him…. for something he said to Johnny. I didn’t know Johnny was a mind reader. also he is apparently a crazy drunk who is selective in who he gets angry to. A massive set of people, but plaintiff is the only one who will get it.

Also he claims Johnny said who the fuck are you? Why are they suggesting johnny didn’t know him when they worked together on a previous project: The Brave, an amazing movie directed, cowritten and starring Johnny

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0112225/?ref_=ttfc_fc_cr167

Also this would have happened “on or about 13th april 2017″,(very weird how we are not getting a set day, as if one would forget, if this story was true, it would be very easy to find out to) but the stamp on the court doc says 6th of july 2018. Meaning he waited nearly a year to press charges (he also didn’t go to police, and the police was on set) the story did leak in the press a month before he pressed charges. For some reason he felt compelled to go to the media first. Extortion maybe?

Thirdly; some post from people who worked with Johnny on the film:

so for all those saying that this case “proofs” that he is “abusive”. No, it really doesn’t

update: 

Johnny Depp is being backed up by a female crew member who denies the actor drunkenly got into a fight with another crew member on a film set.

According to court documents obtained by The Blast, Depp is asking a Los Angeles Court judge to reclassify the case filed by Gregg “Rocky” Brooks as a “limited civil case”. He wants the case moved to a lower court, saying any damages awarded should be less than $25,000.

The actor says the allegations in Brooks’ complaint could not result in damages greater than $25,000.

Depp does not believe punitive damages are warranted in this case. He points out Brooks failed to claim any medical expenses, and the actor continues to deny the alleged assault ever occurred.

He also points out that a script supervisor, Emma Danoff, on the set of the film gave a declaration “attesting to the fact that no physical altercation occurred between Mr. Depp and Mr. Brooks that night, and that she took multiple contemporaneous photographs that confirm her testimony and Mr. Depp’s account.

In her declaration, Danoff wrote that on the night of the alleged assault Depp was “meeting with homeless individuals who were on the street where the City of Lies filming was taking place … He gave them money and gifts.”

She claims to have worked with Depp that night and denies Brooks claims he was drunk.

Danoff even accuses Brooks of having an incident with a black homeless woman, claiming he “loudly and aggressively berated the woman with racial and derogatory slurs for being in his presence and in his way.

She says Depp “immediately stood up … went over to Brooks to stand up for the woman. Mr. Depp said to Mr. Brooks, “you can’t talk to her like that. You think she is something less than you.” She said the actor and Brooks exchanged words and Depp then sat down. Danoff denies Depp ever touched Brooks or told him to punch him.

Depp is using the declaration in support of his attempt to move the case to the lower court.

https://theblast.com/c/johnny-depp-movie-set-assault-lawsuit-female-crew-member-support-city-of-lies

Johnny Depp’s deposition

Read complete doc here: https://pmcdeadline2.files.wordpress.com/2019/10/depp-assault-case-depo.pdf

Johnny Depp says his interaction with a location manager ended nicely with a toast of wine, hugs, and even a selfie.

“I witnessed Mr. Brooks behaving in an irrational and sort of angry manner in which he began too – there happened to be an elderly woman who I supposed he felt was in his way – I don’t know. But he – he was very disrespectful to her and use harsh words with her as if she had done something to him,” the actor began.

Depp continued, “He had – his words to her were with great anger and bitterness – and you know, there was a lot of poison in it. And it was – it was not just, and it was belligerent. And my reaction to that was to stop that confrontation. Was to remind him that he was on a film set and this – he had no right to speak to that woman in that way he was speaking to her. Had no right to treat her that way. Did he think that he was more important than she was?”

Johnny then claims when he confronted brooks about treatment of the woman, he said “He had quite a cocky attitude but it somewhere in the neighborhood of "f*** you. I don’t have to listen to you. He was just sort of standing there chewing gum.”

Depp continued, “You know, he was playing it very cocky as if he wanted some sort of confrontation. He had done something quite ugly with regards to that elderly woman. You know, an elderly black woman who was homeless.”

Depp then explains that after the incident he asked to speak with Brooks and the two men hugged it out, quashed their beef, and even had a toast.

“In fact, I brought – I’d had my assistant bring a bottle of wine. And we toasted in I think paper cups. And, you know, no harm, no foul. I apologized. He apologized. Gave him a hug. We embraced. You know, I hugged him. And everything was cool,” Johnny said to attorney questioning him.

In the end, Johnny claims the guy actually asked for a picture with him following the toast, and Depp agreed.

“As a matter of fact, he asked for a selfie with me. And so I took a selfie with him,” Depp said.

Johnny Depp has accused Brooks of working with his ex-wife Amber Heard. The actor claims Brooks is trying to use the defamation case Johnny filed against Amber as ammunition in this case. 

Selfie

Johnny Depp claims the guy who sued him for assault after an incident on a movie set, asked for a selfie and then hugged it out with the actor. We have a copy of the photo, and it clearly shows Depp was telling the truth.

We have obtained a copy of the actual selfie, that Johnny Depp claims Rocky Brooks asked for, after having a toast following their argument.

As you can see, both Johnny and Rocky are smiling and Brooks doesn’t seem to show any injuries from the incident.

Depp testified during his deposition Brooks and him squashed their beef and toasted some red wine to celebrate the end of shooting. While talking, he says Brooks asked for a picture with the star.

Our sources say, Brooks actually sent the photo to other people with an indication everything was all good with Depp. In one case, it included the quote, “that’s a wrap” including a emoji with sunglasses and a smiley face.

One of those people, send the photo along with text exchanges with Brooks to lawyers in the case.

“In fact, I brought – I’d had my assistant bring a bottle of wine. And we toasted in I think paper cups. And, you know, no harm, no foul. I apologized. He apologized. Gave him a hug. We embraced. You know, I hugged him. And everything was cool. As a matter of fact, he asked for a selfie with me. And so I took a selfie with him,” Depp said during deposition questioning.

Depp’s attorney Adam Waldman tells The Blast, “Today, one more whistleblower who doesn’t know Mr. Depp felt compelled to come forward to defend the truth by presenting a photograph and text exchanges. And yesterday, Judge Fujie denied all of Rocky Brooks’ motions, which were transparent attempts to turn his looming trial into a circus by citing irrelevancies like Amber Heard’s unrelated hoax allegations. Mr. Brooks’ motions exposed what his lawyers meant when they said they were "working with Amber Heard’s counsel Eric George.”

Other facts

a Los Angeles judge sided with Depp and granted his motion. The motion sought to prohibit any evidence or testimony about his ex-wife or alleged drug use in a court case.

Judge Holly Fujie decided the three-day matter would be better dealt with next spring – May 11, 2020 to be exact.

Depp’s lead lawyer Adam Waldman after the Brooks trial date was shifted.: “Rocky Brooks’ opportunistic hoax persists despite overwhelming evidence ranging from the sworn testimony of the multiple eyewitnesses, time-stamped photographs taken by the script supervisor, and other unambiguous facts,” the Endeavor Law Firm attorney asserted. “Because Mr. Brooks’ hoax was granted a scheduling reprieve by the court, justice must unfortunately wait a little longer.”

[lovingjdepp]

In 2016, I was told to masturbate in front of Johnny Depp poster just because I defend him.

And now, her supporters still have an audacity to say Johnny’s being given more benefit of the doubt. 🙄

[saturnairwaves]

Here’s my problem with the Johnny Depp/Amber Heard situation: even with ACTUAL evidence where Heard admits to being the abuser, there are STILL people out there grasping at straws saying “well he pushed her, well he threw this, well what about the video where he’s yelling etc” where was this questioning when it was Johnny Depp? Where was the concern when it was Amber Heard being the victim?

Non fucking existent, bc y’all are so obsessed with canceling celebrities at the drop of the hat so you can feel some kind of justice in the situation. When you sit there and say that he abused her to, you’re saying fuck you to survivors or domestic abuse. He acted in self defense against someone who was hurling things at him, and had on other occasions.

You all have absolutely zero idea of the reality of an abusive relationship and contribute to the stigma that victims face when coming forward. “He was acting aggressively in the video.” When you’re enduring abuse for so long, it’s fucking reasonable to get mad. This is a woman who controlled and manipulated the narrative for YEARS - this is all apart of that, Heard recorded the video as a way to further that control. She wanted control over Johnny, and this is actually clear, not only from the audio but from the court documents from witnesses proving that Heard was following and controlling him.

I 100% believe Johnny acted in self-defense and was probably terrified throughout a majority the relationship. Get off your fucking high horse and pull your head out of your fucking ass - stop trying to excuse Heard’s actions bc you saw a video out of context. Stop ignoring male victims bc you can’t grow up and admit you were wrong.

[emmawatsoff]

shit i said on twitter. if i could apologize to johnny personally, i would.

[emotionalsupportgolem]

I can't believe y'all are falling for this absolute bullshit and I can't believe this is being reblogged UNCRITICALLY WITHOUT COMMENT on my fucking dash in 2020.

Y'all will really use any fucking excuse to dismiss abuse survivors. One photo of Depp on a hospital bed, a few shitty CCTV pictures and audio of Heard saying she hit him is apparently enough for y'all to decide absolutely NO abuse must have ever happened. As if survivors never fight back, or as if abusers never injure themselves while abusing their victims.

Honestly fuck you.

[lovingjdepp]

I’m sure this person doesn’t even listen to the audio. She clearly stated she started the physical fight, and that he ‘always split’ everytime they had a fight, and that he ‘never fight’. All from her own mouth.

[mcmxxxi]

my new otp. ommmmmgmgmgmgmgmgmg it’s so painful and so good

[politicalmamaduck]

Writing about a child rapist did not make Vladimir Nabokov a child rapist.

Writing about an authoritarian theocracy did not make Margaret Atwood an authoritarian theocrat.

Writing about adultery did not make Leo Tolstoy an adulterer.

Writing about a ghost did not make Toni Morrison a ghost.

Writing about a murderer did not make Fyodor Dostoevsky a murderer.

Writing about a teenage addict did not make Isabel Allende a teenage addict.

Writing about dragons and ice zombies did not make George R.R. Martin either of those things.

Writing about rich heiresses, socially awkward bachelors, and cougar widows did not make Jane Austen any of those things.

Writing about people who can control earthquakes did not make N.K. Jemisin able to control earthquakes.

Writing about your favorite characters and/or ships in situations that you choose does not make you a bad person.

It’s a shame that in this day and age these things need to be said.

[nyarnamaitar]

Or, in short: the narrator =/ the author.

[oblakom-deactivated20200302]

You know what else is a shame? This nowadays tendency of putting on the author the responsibility of teaching their readers morality.

Authors are allowed to write morally ambiguous characters.

Authors are allowed to write downright despicable characters - and guess what they are even allowed to make despicable characters charismatic and likeble and the protagonists of their stories if they wish - because absolute monsters exist only under the bed.

It is not up to the author to spoonfeed the readers about morality and Yes I know this character did a bad thing and I am going going to show it in the story and make other characters call them out of it and– Bullshit.

The authors should be able to write what they want without having thousands of people jumping and their throats claiming to know them, their ideas and their morality based on what they write.

It’s not up to the author to teach you about what is right and what is wrong.

[cleodoramer-deactivated20230405]

This next thread might be difficult for some to read. That just means it is extremely important that the information within it be spread as much as possible!

This one I’ll title: Amber’s Confessions

Here we go!

I’m will not be typing everything out from the attached images and dialogue. So I stress that you read everything attached so that you understand what I’m referencing when I discuss it.

Keep in mind that Amber is under oath at the time of this questioning. 

We begin with Blair Berk asking Amber to listen to a short audio clip and identify the individual’s voices in it. Amber properly does so by confirming the voices belong to Johnny & herself.

The audio clip has Amber (Female voice) apologizing to Johnny (Male voice) for hitting him in the head with a door.

When asked to confirm that the tape is describing her violent act against him, she states she was “attempting to close the door” he was trying to get in, to try and “escape an assault”. Not actually answering the question.

She is then asked if it’s true that, on the tape, she tells Johnny she is sorry. To which she answers “Yes”.

More of the audio tape is then played. Johnny says “and then you fucking clocked me”. Amber said “I remember hitting you as a response to the door thing.” She then confirms this under oath.

After once again attempting to explain away why she hit him after slamming a door into his head, she is asked if she said on the tape that she hit him. She then claims to not know what words she used, even though they were just played back to her.



Another clip is played with Amber acknowledging, on tape, hitting Johnny with the door and in the head. And once again she won’t directly confirm what was said with a “yes” or “no”, only referring back to the tape.

The next several pages include a much lengthier portion of the audio tape. In it is the actual description (as described in the conversation between Johnny & Amber) of what really happened during this particular incident.

It is worth noting that while lying under oath, Amber testified everything was a result of her trying to escape into a room away from Johnny.

But what you’re about to read paints a completely different picture. Keep in mind this is a previously recorded conversation between Johnny & Amber that is being played back to Amber during her deposition.

On this page of the conversation, Johnny is recounting to Amber what happened. He was in the bathroom and she was knocking on the door. After several knocks he opened it. As she was trying to come in, he tried repeatedly to close the door.

I want to point out that this is a far cry from what she described when she lied under oath stating she was trying to get away from Johnny. Turns out, she was actually trying to get to him while he was inside the bathroom.

On the following page Johnny continues to describe how, when trying to shut the door to prevent her from entering, the door accidentally must’ve scraped her toes.

Immediately after he described bending down and she pushed/kicked the door open into his head. During this conversation, Amber never denies any of these actions, only saying she didn’t mean to kick the door into his head.

She never denied trying to force her way into the bathroom where Johnny was. She doesn’t deny kicking the door open. Only saying she didn’t do it so that it would hit him in the head.

When questioned by Blair Berk to confirm that she did hit him with the door, Amber only says “I said whatever I said in that recording”. Confirming the accurate depiction of the incident as recounted in the audio tape.

The audio tape begins to play again, rolling over to the next page with Amber telling Johnny that kicking the bathroom door into his head was not on purpose.

Johnny moves the conversation forward by saying he stood up and might have said “What the fuck” as a result of being hit in the head with the door. After he “stood up” he tells her “then you fucking clocked me.”

Again, she does not deny this violent act. She only tells him she remembers doing it (clocking him) as a response to “the door thing” (the door previously scraping her toes while he was trying to keep her out of the bathroom.)

As the conversation again rolls over to the next page, Johnny interrupts Amber trying to say she “didn’t mean to…” By saying “You didn’t mean to hit me in the head with the door…but you did mean to punch me in the jaw”

Her response is damning! She responded by saying “I meant to hit you…” “I do remember I did mean to hit you.” And even admits it again just a few lines later.

SHE ADMITTED in an audio recording of a conversation between her & Johnny to kicking a door into his head & punching him in the face! At no point is it ever mentioned that she was trying to get away from him. She was actually trying to get to him!

After the audio tape ends and she is asked to confirm what was recorded, she scrambles to tell a very different story than what was just played back to her.

She again LIED UNDER OATH, saying the door scraped her toes while he was trying to get into the room. She then testified she pushed him and that was the “hit” that was referred to in the audio. Even though it was clearly identified as a “punch in the jaw”

What comes next I find immensely disturbing. She says “if he was ever hit or touched” he referred to it as “punching or clocked or whatever” or “cold-clock”. She added “I mean, he was just very dramatic about everything about it.”

If you recall, according to Amber’s most recent declaration submitted as an attempt to get the lawsuit against her dismissed, she cherry picked a brief snippet of her deposition, in which she lies under oath yet again as to how many times she has hit, struck or assaulted Johnny.

She testified that she has hit or struck Johnny one time to “save her baby sister” even though he was not threatening her sister. But she clearly didn’t want the rest of her deposition included because it instantly proves that to be a lie.

And by saying things so coldly like “he was so dramatic” “if he was ever hit or touched” or “pushed” should call into question just how often she did kick, push, hit, or cold-clock him, only to turn around and frame him as the abuser.

Next I will examine another incident of violence committed against Johnny Depp by Amber Heard.

To be continued…

[lovingjdepp]

so Johnny Depp has audio recordings of Amber Heard’s confession, and already submitted it to the court since 2016 which she got to listen to it, and admitted that it’s true, yet still mocked him for being ‘overdramatic about everything about this’. 

AMBER HEARD SAID HER VICTIM WAS JUST DRAMATIC FOR BEING PUNCHED!!!! 

Let that sinks in. 

He got an audio recordings of her confession. If you still don’t believe him, I don’t know what you’re fighting for anymore. 

[angelholme]

Charges against Jussie Smollett dropped

Prosecutors drop charges against actor Jussie Smollett which alleged he staged a homophobic attack - US media

So - just to be clear - a black guy gets attacked in a pretty brutal way.

The police say “No - it was fake”, drag him through a HUMILIATING public spectacle of accusation, arrest and charges…….

And then drop it.

Thus making sure his reputation is ruined forever, making sure the entire right wing can claim “BUT HE FAKED IT” and setting back the “black lives matter” movement a good few years, but without the bother of actually having to prove that he actually faked the attack in a court of law?

They don’t have to prove he was guilty, they can just smear his name, his reputation and - with this one act - let the right and the Republic party smear liberals everywhere.

For fucks’ sake. 

Is Mr Smollett going to get an apology for the arrest? For the charges? For the national humiliation? 

Is the cf weasel sat in The Oval Office going to apologise for ANYTHING he said about this? He was so quick to point fingers when Mr Smollett was charged - will he be so quick to apologise now there is no case to answer?

Or is he just going to go “well this proves nothing - he is obviously guilty” despite his crowing over his “vindication” in the past few days?

[phlegm-the-alcoholic-dreg]

I’m sorry, but have you listened to the statements made by the prosecution recently?

He’s NOT innocent. They CHOSE to drop the charges I exchange for his 10k bond and the “public service” he did.

He PAID for his get out of jail free card.

Which means he used his money and influence to get out of what would have been 16 felony convictions. Meanwhile underprivileged minorities go to jail for years for far less. Classism much?

The man is a fake, and is going to become an updated version of Al Sharpton. He deserves the full scrutiny of the American people, not blind adoration for pulling the right strings with the prosecution.

NOBODY OWES HIM AN APOLOGY

[depparium]