No title available

oozey mess
Misplaced Lens Cap
𩵠avery cochrane š©µ
No title available

No title available
h
Doug Jones
art blog(derogatory)
The Bowery Presents
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Noah Kahan
Cosimo Galluzzi
Cosmic Funnies

titsay
official daine visual archive

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club

izzy's playlists!
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Kiana Khansmith

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Russia

seen from Canada

seen from Poland
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Lebanon

seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Lebanon

seen from Canada

seen from Indonesia

seen from Bangladesh
seen from Colombia
seen from Nepal

seen from United States

seen from China

seen from Indonesia
seen from United States
seen from South Korea
@maddramaqueen-blog
Plus:
Twitter thread by A.R. Moxon (Julius Goat)Ā āTry to imagine menās reactionsā¦ā
Friends hearing me point out gender bias in media
Iām printing this tweet and putting it on my desk
I really hate on this website that we erased the term monosexism as it was a very useful term m-spec people have being using for years but terfs decided it was bad becuse it group them with straight people and all of you believed it.
Monosexism is the belief that people who are only attracted to one gender is somehow better or more superior to those who are not monosexual.
Monosexism seeing everything as only gay or straight and if your not you either lying or making things up.
Monosexism is erasing multisexual people are seeing them as less memebers in tge community.
Monosexism is seeing multisexual people are dangerous and dirty
Monosexism is seeing m-spec men as gay men who havent fully accepted themselves as gay.
Monosexism is seeing m-spec women as either lesbians or straight women depending on who your talking to
Monosexism is not seeing multisexual as a full identity and only half of something or on the way of realizing our ātrueā sexuality.
But you guys all decided it was bad becuase terfs said it āgroup gays with the straights and that it was inherently evil for that.ā And you believed it.
āItās okay to have differing opinions on things.ā
Yes. It is. About things like pineapple on pizza, or about a brand of makeup.
Not when itās about somebodyās basic human rights.
Never when itās about somebodyās basic human rights.
āWell if so many disabled people are being killed then why am i not seeing it on the news?ā
I give you one good reason brenda
Disabled folks often dieĀ āof illnessesā and people just sort of take that as a natural course of being disabled, rather than a violent and preventable death.
Even when the cause of death is reported on, such as the man who died while rationing his insulin because he couldnāt afford it, it is a flash in the pan and few people will acknowledge that sort of death is violent at all.
People have been taught that violence is mostly punching and shooting people, but withholding abundant resources while people around you die is a violent act. Price gouging essential medicine so people pay up or die is a violent act, just as much as a mugger who tells you they will shoot you if you donāt give them your wallet.
A large amount if people whoĀ ādie of illnessā are actually dying because they have been refused treatment and care, and those effects are cumulative over a lifetime.
People have been tricked into believing that disabled people die of their disabilities, that our lot in life is suffering and little else and that our deaths are a mercy. So they donāt see our deaths as violent, they donāt see the cruelty of the system, they donāt understand the prolonged horror and pain that are caused.
And then there are those who simply donāt care, who donāt see us as worthy of life, as worthy of being human. As weāve seen first hand in the comments on some of your posts, some people want to get theirs and fuck everyone else. Which isnāt how a society is supposed to function but what the fuck ever right?
In the UK weāve seen disabled people dying of starvation, of neglect and huge spikes in disabled deaths as a direct result of government cut, and itās still barely making the news.
yall better be just as outraged about this as you were about notre dame
This is even WORSE.
To elaborate why this is worse: Art and religion are all well and good. But information can be critical. When libraries burn, information can be lost forever. Because we photograph art. We have blueprints of the Cathedral. The Notre Dame cathedral did not burn to the ground, only the wooden structures did. The entire library and everything within is gone here. Another reason this is worse? It was DELIBERATE. It was bombed. Accidents like Notre Dame happen all the time. But bombings donāt have to happen. So yeah, if you cared about Notre Dame, logically you should care about this too,