yup I did pretty much abandon this blog
KIROKAZE
i don't do bad sauce passes
No title available

pixel skylines
Mike Driver
One Nice Bug Per Day

Kiana Khansmith

No title available
taylor price

Origami Around
Game of Thrones Daily

Janaina Medeiros
will byers stan first human second

blake kathryn

titsay

★
we're not kids anymore.
Cosimo Galluzzi
wallacepolsom
tumblr dot com

seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from France

seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Türkiye

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Austria

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
@magisterzot
yup I did pretty much abandon this blog
Glenn Gould
(Gordon Parks. 1956)
In Memory
On October 19, 1987, the extraordinary cellist Jacqueline du Pre died of multiple sclerosis. She is most famous for her absolutely stunning Elgar Cello Concerto, which can be found here. I first heard the Elgar in reference to her and now whenever I do hear it, it pulls on my heart like rubber.
While it’s not my place to tell you what to do, I’d really appreciate it if everyone that sees this post just takes thirty seconds out of their day to have a little moment of silence for her. She was a supremely wonderful cellist and I think that she should be remembered.
If you want to learn more, her Wikipedia page is here.
who is traitor joe
Unlike most animals that are born through the process of reproduction, hedgehogs are actually created by following a very elaborate recipe. Although we can’t give out too many specifics, the recipe does call for a sprinkle of adorableness, a dash of sassiness, and a pinch of cleverness.
Life goal of learning a Rush song accomplished!
Like generally these things will increase your chances of getting into a science PhD program. This is geared toward traditional researched-based PhD programs, and may not apply for, like, pharmacy school.
1. good recommendations from well-known people in the field. And not like “this person took my class and got an A” but like “I have a personal relationship/have seen them do work/etc and can vouch for them.” Admissions committees are made up of professors in the department, so they know who the big names are. Smaller names who have a relationship with people on the committee and can make a call are good. Smaller names who you have worked closely with and can say you have specific qualities that make you a good grad student are good. Cookie-cutter recs from small names are not great. If you did research in a lab, not having a rec from that person doesn’t look great. Academic recs are preferred to industry ones.
2. Lab experience in a related subject. Published articles in peer-reviewed journals are excellent and will set your application apart from others. Papers are proof of productivity. Experience means they won’t have to take as much time to train you. Even though a good advisor should be willing to teach you, trained students are more productive and help professors win grants. It also makes you more competitive for fellowships. Experience means you know what you’re getting in to. Most top programs will not consider you if you don’t have any experience
3. GPA. higher GPAs are better but if you are coming from a well-known school, committees will likely know what your GPA means (so known grade inflation will be taken into account). If your department generally gives low GPAs, doesn’t rank its students, and isn’t super well known, a note from an advisor/ professor/dean etc giving you an approximate rank will be very helpful. (a 3.0 was a really good gpa for my undergrad physics dept, but lower than the average applicant’s so advisors sent out letters with PhD applications explaining that).
4. GRE. from my understanding, GREs are cut-offs. So they count against you if they’re low but don’t help much if they’re high. Analytical scores are generally more important than verbal ones in science programs.
5. Essay. this is a bit more like a cover letter than a traditional college essay. Programs want to know what you offer them (remember, they’re paying you) so focus a bit more on concrete accomplishments and your passion for the work than a generally compelling story.
What’s helped me when applying for stuff is thinking of the kind of person you would want to admit if you were in charge of doing that. Then look at your application through that lens. Don’t lie, but highlight the things that make you look like that person and de-emphasize things that don’t.