👌💀

i reblog junk. this is a sideblog. i follow from caterwaulerr.

[zhinico]

ok

[doubleca5t]

WHICH FUCKING MCYT WHITE BOY IS 33 YEARS OLD???????

[doubleca5t]

[toldasor]

[chandelyer-deactivated20241003]

Zuhair Murad fall 2021 rtw

[dark-deathrage]

you're a stupid fucking anti-sjw lol. This blog is stupid. I hate you crackers white people SUCK go suck a dick.

looks like I triggered more sjws. Keep sending these asks they only fuel my logic. 

[ulysseus]

Never forget the guy who didn’t remember to hit anon before sending himself hate mail

[mars-the-4th-planet]

His soul mate.

their son.

[the-real-adam-taurus]

Omg 😂😂😂

[the-based-brit]

“Being an attractive young woman”

Stefan, you’re literally a 54-year-old MAN, but go off I guess XD

[urbanfantasyinspiration]

Where’s that tweet where the white politician pretended to be a black man?

[chilled-welsh-sam]

@urbanfantasyinspiration this one?

[shesnake]

Elliot Page photographed by Wynne Nelly for TIME, March 2021.

[sawasawako-archived]

me giving relationship advice: communicate or end it

[sawasawako-archived]

like, i genuinely believe most problems in the average relationship can be dealt with if the people involved just had an honest, open conversation with each other. it doesn’t have to reach a resolution or be peaceable or anything, just hash things out. air out dirty laundry. all parties have a responsibility. one person can’t be doing all the work while the other just stonewalls, indefinitely. work your shit out, no matter how long it takes and how messy it is, bc that’s the test of love/friendship. you fail it if you end things prematurely, and you fail it if you unilaterally fashion yourself as the victim/wronged party and the other as the perpetrator/aggressor. a relationship should be 50/50, and that means taking on the share of the work it takes to mend and maintain relations when the going gets tough. relationships require effort, and a lot of it is just conflict mediation & resolution, which requires all parties to play their part. easier said than done, obviously, but that’s all the more reason to work at it

[tiktoksthataregood-ish]

[xxx---sink----xxx]

google maps literally sending me thru a best buy here

[gamecubewizard]

speedrunning strats

[petalpetal]

[mossworm]

I love to draw animals in this shape

[nerdie-faerie]

15th march on other sites is just like 'its mid march I guess??' but on Tumblr it's all 'hey remember when we all teamed up to murder a politician? We should do that again' as if we were all personally there to kill Caesar

[toboldlywrite]

Are you really…. not supposed to…. describe what your characters are wearing….

[by-ethan-fox]

I think there’s a great deal of misinformation on this topic.

I believe it’s fine to describe what your characters are wearing. However, like all things, it should serve some kind of purpose.

For instance, describing winter clothes helps impart to the reader a sense of how cold it is. Describing summer clothes helps explain how warm it is.

Describing an outfit before a social event gives a window onto the character’s sense of fashion, or explains their reverence (or lack) for the event; for example a character can wear a black suit to a funeral, or watch from a distance while wearing a t-shirt and jeans. These impart a different attitude.

An outfit may be described purely to give a little more interest to a character; to give the reader a bit more insight into who they are, through the way they present themselves. It may have no greater significance to the wider story but this is still a reason to do it.

So the “purpose” doesn’t need to be super-vital to the story. It can be just because “describing this to the reader helps them appreciate the character or scene”, but that’s still a purpose.

[toboldlywrite]

I like that last comment because I think it can apply to a lot of things in storytelling! Anything that shows some element of your character has a purpose to the story even if it doesn’t exactly advance the plot.

[bayoucurse]

I think too there’s also the matter of how it’s described.

“I was wearing a purple hoodie, black skinny jeans, and checkered converse.”

 vs 

“I wiped my palms on the thighs of my jeans. Black was the best color for when you’re going grave robbing – the dirt and blood didn’t stand out as much. Sadie flung the shovel back with a little more force than was necessary, flinging hunks of dirt onto my shoes. I paid 85$ for these limited edition checkered converse, and while perhaps I shouldn’t have been wearing them to grave rob, I didn’t have anything else. I pulled Abby’s shirt out of the pocket of my hoodie, running my fingers over the fabric. It was covered in purple lint from my jacket, but she wouldn’t care anyways. She was dead”

Treat the clothes as an aspect of the character and the situation. The first one is just information about one thing thrown at the reader, whereas you get the same information in the second, but you’re also presented with a situation, thoughts behind the dress choice for the situation, and a reaction from the reader (why is the character going grave robbing? Who is Sadie? How did Abby die?). You get so much more out of your story and your character.

[bookishdiplodocus]

Reblogging this again for @endymions ’s addition.

[prokopetz]

Also bear in mind that your implicit point of view is important even when writing in the third person – it’s not just a first-person thing.

Unless you’re writing in the objective voice (which you probably aren’t, because it’s a. only appropriate in a few specific circumstances, and b. extremely difficult to write well), your writing is going to have an implied viewpoint character – usually but not always the focus character of the scene – so you’ve gotta ask yourself: what would my PoV character make note of?

Spending a paragraph doing a point-by-point breakdown of a character’s outfit is the equivalent of your PoV stopping to give them the full once over. Is that appropriate? Is it in character? Did they get caught doing it?

Even a flatly factual description that offers no direct opinions on what’s observed tells you something about your PoV’s personality, because now you know what sort of things they do and don’t notice.

(You can, of course, get around most of those issues by having an omniscient narrator who’s weirdly preoccupied with people’s fashion choices, but that just moves the question back a step – now you have to think about what you’re saying about your omniscient narrator’s priorities, and what this implies for how completely and accurately they’re reporting the action!)

[heywriters]

All good advice. In spec fic or historical fiction, I enjoy it when the writer gets especially detailed and tells me where the fabric is from and how good a quality it is or whatever.

I do not like in any story where the character’s outfit is constantly described like they just got a new wardrobe at the mall (ex: Nancy Drew) or are clearly wearing the author’s dream outfit. The latter is usually noticeable because they don’t put as much attention onto other things or the outfit is very stereotypically “cool” or “pretty” and the author leans into that without irony or explanation (ex: My Immortal).

[veeranger]

[pochacco]

i am stupid for free. no one pays me to be this stupid and i think that’s very brave

[lenbian-moved-deactivated202601]

i like quizes i like clicking buttons i like results

[sweelcreature]

you say ‘what’s up?’, we say ‘VAS HAPPENIN?’ you say mcdonalds, we say NANDO’S. you say the beach, we say MALABAMI. you say junk food, we say CARROTS.  you say a pigeon, we say KEVIN! you say spoons, we say NO WAY! we are love. we are one. we are directioners <3

[ohimtherebabey]

My Chemical Romance, I Never Told You What I Do For A Living / George Clint, 'Julius Caesar,' Act III, Scene 2, the Murder Scene (1822) / Vincenzo Camuccini, The Death of Julius Caesar (1825-1829) / William Holmes Sullivan, 'Julius Caesar,' Act III, Scene 1, the Assassination / William Holmes Sullivan, 'Julius Caesar,' Act III, Scene 2, Marc Antony's Oration

[lilydvoratrelundar]