M

I'm 25 || Aquarius || she/her/hers || PAN 🩷💛🩵 || I love food, the aesthetic of cottagecore, & music

[multifandomposts-blog]

First of all, a reminder to everyone that Maddie S was formerly A MEAN GIRL. Her reply to the fan in the DMs - who was just being sweet and kind - confirms she's STILL one plus the negative, gold digging energy people pick up on her. Also there was a girl on tik tok who said Maddie BULLIED her in high school and it left a traumatic effect on her. Now Maddie is getting the KARMA AND TREATMENT she inflicted onto other people. I don't feel sorry for her @ss at all! What goes around comes around. ;)

Guys, stop. I still haven't edited the fanfic, and somehow y'all have dragged me right back into discourse. Welcome back to another TED Talk.

Let's break this down piece by piece because I have questions.

First claim: "Maddie was a mean girl."

Okay. Was she? Maybe. I wasn't there. Were you there? Were any of us personally involved? If somebody has screenshots, yearbook receipts, firsthand accounts, or actual evidence, feel free to send it to me because I'm willing to look at information. But random TikTok stories and "I heard from somebody who heard from somebody" aren't automatically facts.

Second claim: "There was a girl on TikTok who said Maddie bullied her in high school."

Again, okay. Did that happen? Maybe. I'm not saying it didn't. But one person making a claim online doesn't automatically make it true. People lie, exaggerate, misunderstand situations, and sometimes tell the truth. That's why evidence matters. If there are screenshots or proof, then that's a different conversation. But I don't like treating hearsay as established fact.

Third claim: "This is karma."

Even if she was mean in high school, does that mean harassment is suddenly okay? Does that mean people get free passes to attack her appearance, body, relationship, or send weird messages? I don't think so. Criticizing someone's actions is one thing. Harassing somebody is another.

Fourth claim: "Gold digger energy."

Respectfully, how do any of us know that? We don't know these people. We don't know what happens in their relationship. We don't know their finances. We don't know their conversations. You can dislike somebody without assigning motives that you literally have no way of proving.

And lastly, I think people need to separate criticism from assumptions. It's completely fair to criticize her response to the fan DM. I thought it was unnecessarily harsh too. But once we start jumping into "she bullied somebody," "she's a gold digger," "this is karma," and presenting speculation as fact, that's where I start asking for receipts.

Maybe some of these claims are true. Maybe none of them are. I genuinely don't know. But I prefer evidence over internet whispers.

Part two: my response if all these claims are true.

Now, let's say for the sake of argument that everything being said here is 100% true. Let's say she really was a mean girl. Let's say she really did bully people in high school and left somebody with lasting trauma. If that's true, then I completely understand why some people wouldn't feel sympathy for her. I understand why people would say, "Well, actions have consequences." I understand why the people she hurt might not be interested in extending grace to her.

If she genuinely hurt people, then those people have every right to tell their stories and speak on their experiences. Nobody is obligated to forgive somebody who wronged them. And I don't think being famous or dating somebody famous should shield anyone from criticism.

But even if every single story is true, I still think criticism should be about the actual behavior. If she bullied people, criticize that. If she made a rude response to a fan, criticize that. If you disagree with her political opinions, criticize those opinions. That's fair.

What I don't understand is how we jump from "she was allegedly mean in high school" to making comments about her face, body, relationship, and calling her names. Those things have nothing to do with the original issue. If we're going to hold people accountable, then hold them accountable for what they actually did, not for things we're projecting onto them.

And honestly, if all these stories are true, then I would hope she has changed. Most people aren't the exact same person they were at 16 or 17 years old. Growth exists. Accountability exists. Learning from mistakes exists. If she hasn't changed, then that's on her. But if she has, then I don't think somebody deserves to be endlessly harassed for the rest of their life over things they did as a teenager if they are willing to admit to it and to the harm it caused.

So even in the scenario where all of these claims are true, my opinion still doesn't become, "Dogpile her and say whatever you want." My opinion becomes, "Talk about the actual behavior, demand accountability, and keep the criticism proportional."

Because criticism and harassment are not the same thing.

And let me say this too, because I feel like some people are gonna read all of this and assume I'm some huge Maddie defender. I'm not.

I don't even like Maddie Simpson that much. I don't agree with her political opinions, and if all the things people are saying about her past are true, I definitely don't agree with those either. I criticize her political opinions all the time, and that's my right, just like it's her right to have those opinions. Disagreeing with somebody doesn't mean they suddenly stop being a human being.

I've said this before and I'll say it again because it's my favorite sentence at this point: we are all coming to conclusions based off the same amount of limited information. Whether they genuinely love each other or not, whether they're soulmates or whether they're headed for a breakup, none of us actually know. Unless they either break up or stay married for the next fifty years, we're never really going to know what their relationship was like behind closed doors.

I've been very open about my own opinions. I don't personally think their relationship is going anywhere. I don't think they're getting married. But that's just my opinion based on public information, and I could be completely wrong. At the end of the day, none of us know these people.

And let's be honest here. Whether people like Maddie or not, our dislike isn't going to erase a decade-long relationship. They've been together for ten years. That's still his fiancée. He clearly has love, loyalty, or at the very least some sort of commitment to her, because otherwise they wouldn't still be together after all this time.

And honestly? I think the second movie is cooked. I'm sorry. I really do. Between everything happening with the invasive fans, the drama, the group chat situation that I've already talked about and refuse to revisit because absolutely not, and now this, the whole thing just feels exhausting.

At this point, I genuinely don't have any more words, any more energy, or any more time for this. What the fuck.

Anyway, thank y'all for coming to another TED Talk.

Tag list : @cocomilaa @blcknebula @stiflersbabymama @callmeoncette @needjoekeery @nuttyrebelflower @1eliana123-blog @ladyearthsea @rastharex @darkgreengrl @bananajoeclone @violet0182 @minghaossv @melynex @thebabykashmere @ghoulxeg @simply-lovley44

@raefoxiegirl @peacemakersbeloved @devynrulesboisdrool @skiicoreee @boredpretty @michaelssparklysocks @sometranslationnoteru @strawberrkiwis @irissunshines @agustdpeach @fluffypuddingatz

@joeburrowife

@1meshugge1 @whyxo @coornballz @plan3tch1ld @juicybigfart @swavydadon @miratate @melaninjoys @enzo6ekiiii @hyperfixawahhhh

[gothicmj]

Always hate when people say an artist is anywhere NEAR Michael’s level. They reduce his impact down to just sales/commercial success (which no one has even accomplished for one) and Michael’s legacy is far more than that. Michael pioneered the entire music industry over the span of FOUR decades, and did it all as a black man who was exploited from childhood until his death. He is an immortal figure who altered the course of our entire culture and is a phenomenon of human history we will never see again! So no… no one is the “next” Michael Jackson.

[mea-fae]

EXACTLY!!

[letters-to-lgbt-kids]

My dear lgbt+ kids, 

Gender dysphoria is not an excuse to police other peoples bodies. 

Let me take a step back to explain what I mean: Gender dysphoria can show up in a lot of different ways. It’s not only „discomfort with chest and genitalia“ or „discomfort with naked body“ - but of course that can be a big part, and that part can make you feel wildly uncomfortable in perfectly harmless situations. It is fully understandable to seek relief from it! Apart from the „big steps“ (like hormones or surgery), many trans people do so by finding their own accommodations. Clothing is the obvious example here but it can be small habits too, such as avoiding to look in the mirror after a shower. 

That is selfcare (in the non-romanticized meaning of that word). You do what you need to do to improve your own wellbeing and quality of life - it only becomes an issue when that idea of accommodating yourself is misused to tell other people what to do. 

Before I get further into this, let me say: the overwhelming majority of trans people wouldn’t even think to use it that way - and the very few who do are often quite young and still figuring stuff out. It can also come from cis people who want to be supportive and just misunderstand how to do that. So, read this in a „firm but kind“ type of voice, not an angry one. 

What am I talking about when I say „policing other people’s bodies“? It’s stuff like this: 

„You shouldn’t post about pregnancy on an lgbt+ blog, I’m a trans man and even thinking about pregnancy gives me severe dysphoria“ - you can accommodate yourself by not engaging with pregnancy content, by filtering tags or unfollowing blogs. But you can not tell other people to not talk about an important bodily function and life chapter.

„Trans people who haven’t had bottom surgery shouldn’t post nudes, it makes me dysphoric“ - again, you can accommodate yourself by just not looking. Unfollow, block, filter. But don’t tell them what they can or can’t do with their bodies.

„I understand the whole idea of T4T but it gives me so much gender dysphoria to even think about having sex with one of those trans people who won’t even go on hormones or try to pass“ - then just stop thinking about sex with them. Honestly, talking about how anyone’s body is not good enough for you to sexually fantasize about is just creep behavior, dysphoria or not. People don’t exist to be good wank material for you. 

You see the common pattern in all these examples: Accommodations are about you. You can decide to change your habits, your behavior, your style, your sexual activities and (if medical transition is accessible for you) even your own body. You can not decide that someone else needs to change theirs. 

With all my love,

Your Tumblr Dad

[lanasladybug]

if you support ice or trump in any way shape or form I’m gonna need you to go ahead and block me because it is that serious

[dukeofdelirium]

media so desperate to hide the fact that Trump is in the Epstein files that they had to take a publicly available picture of Michael Jackson with his children and cover their faces to make it look like he was supposedly with Epstein victims lmao. Even tho Epstein victims straight up said MJ never did anything to them and was never there. Be fr… 😒

[mea-fae]

The media is SO EFFING PATHETIC for saying it was Michael Jackson when it was JEFFREY EPSTEIN ALL ALONG!! They knew that MJ is innocent and they still use him as a scapegoat. MJ would NEVER HURT KIDS!! Jeffrey Epstein, Trump, and their supporters disgust me to the core.

[sheneedsrocknroll92]

I would have loved to see him again. To see him having a better ending, a closure. An ending that he truly deserved. But after seeing that horrible mess that s5 it's been, I'm so grateful Eddie/Joe weren't involved at all.

Would have loved to see Eddie back and maybe alive hanging out with the rest of the gang? Yes. But just to think about the kind of dialogue or jokes they would have gave to him makes me cringe and feel embarrased lol. So I'm glad he was never there.

I'm gonna miss him so much, for the rest of my life. But I feel so grateful that a lot of you are still keeping him alive. In your fanart, in your stories, in your headcanons, in your love for him.

So thank you all for still creating a world where my favorite character is alive and happy and in love and living his best life.

Thanks to you, he's having the happiness he truly deserved.

#EddieForever

#HellfireForever

[itsxcm-blog]

REBLOG if you love Michael Jackson more than Tumblr.

[marattemptstostudy]

people that actually don’t reblog this

WHOEVER DOESNT REBLOG THIS IS STUPID! Just sayin… <3

[kingkishou]

I'm only saying this for your sake, but objectively, it's not a smart idea to bring politics into normal hobbies. You might lose supporters of your blog just because of your political stance, and that would be terrible since you're so amazing!! It's only a suggestion, but I really reccomend not bringing politics into anything.

[spider-starry]

MY BLOG IS NOT A SAFE PLACE FOR MAGA LOSERS!! GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE!!! UNFOLLOW ME RIGHT FUCKING NOW!!!

[dykechael]

The phobia that exists towards Michael is rooted in racism, queerphobia (in relation to his gender nonconformity), and ableism, and can be traced primarily to the freak persona that the white media created for Michael Jackson to justify their decades-long dehumanization of him, which has caused immense damage that we unfortunately still see.

Michael did not fit any social constructed box and that caused a great anxiety in our culture and we still see this anxiety in the public consciousness.

We now live in a time when we fans are trying to restore Michael's humanity by educating people and making them understand that Michael was ultimately just a human being and that the stigmas against him are completely unjustified and must be dispelled. Unfortunately, the story is so long and the problem so deep-rooted, and new problems are constantly arising, that this struggle may continue for years to come

[djospurnell]

Joseph Quinn Keeps Teasing a Return As Eddie Munson for 'Stranger Things' Season 5

We know Eddie Munson will still be present but Joseph Quinn's actual return is a mystery still...

Profile

OMFG PLEASEEEEE

[mea-fae]

[dun-dun-dun-larry]

Unpopular opinion: I don’t want the boys to do any reunion show or be on staged together anytime soon.

It’s gonna take a band member dying for yall to realize that you liked being in the band again? Seriously? And someone like Liam that wanted to be on stage with them so bad.

[solvatochrome]

i’ll forgive a fat girl for so many annoying things simply because i know how fucking miserable it is to be a fat girl. like. you dont get to exist freely and with any joy until you go through a decades long soul search full of extreme emotional pain OR you nearly kill yourself to become something society might accept. or you toughen up after years of bullying forced you to be more confident. literally there is no painless route to being a fat girl in your 20 somethings. so like. fat girls can be annoying as a treat. you have all been annoying our whole lives

[madamsixx]

There were parents dropping their kids at Michael Jackson’s hours and were never charged. How do you just leave your kids with a random grown man or woman and pretend everything is fine

In the end the fbi couldn’t find anything to charge Michael I do think it’s weird he he had kids sleeping at house

Well, Michael didn't give them a reason not to trust him. He had a whole theme park in Neverland. A place where children could go and play. He wasn't random. They got to know all the parents before they brought their kids over to his place. He always exchanged numbers with all the parents and kept in touch with them.

As for sleeping over. It can be a cultural thing. In African culture, they live by it takes a village to raise a child. It doesn't matter who the person is. A stranger has a right to discipline your child. A stranger can feed your child. You can walk into a person's house who lives in a whole other neighborhood and stay there. And even sleep there.

Now obviously western culture is different. But some people have their cultures where they're okay with their children sleeping over at a grown person's place if they trust them and know them.

And he wasn’t charged because he's innocent. He never did anything.

The Chandlers especially the money-hungry father Evan who was going bankrupt and was behind on his child support at the time did it to extort money from MJ. The FBI found that out. The dad drugged his son during a tooth extraction with sodium amytal because the dad was a dentist. And claimed that his son said that MJ touched him. During the investigation, Evan the father kept refusing to cooperate and kept saying he didn't want to go to court he just wanted MJ to pay money. So MJ did. His son didn't want anything to do with him after they got their payment. He cut his father off when he grew up and refused to talk bad about MJ.

Mind you, they interviewed ALL the children from 93-94 who were at Neverland Ranch and ALL the children said he never touched them. Macaulay Culkin, Cory Feldman, Jennifer Love Hewitt, Wade Robson, and James Safecheck. Especially the last two. They swore up and down that MJ never touched them.

Years later fame-hungry Wade Robson came out and made his false allegations about Michael. He was caught lying. I read his emails to the MJ estate, the one he claimed he didn’t know even existed. He begged them desperately for a job and MJ’s estate repeatedly turned him down. Because he was out of a job and going broke. Months later he's claiming that Michael abused him.

During the Wade trial, they tried every possible way to get Jordan Chandler the first kid whose dad claimed that MJ abused him to take the stand and speak against MJ. He refused. He didn’t care if he was going to be forced to go to court. He said he was not speaking against MJ.

Even up to this day Macaulay Culkin and Cory Feldman say MJ never did anything. And Mac is very close with MJ's family.

[dukeofdelirium]

This is kind of misinformed.

The parents of the accusers were there with their children. They testified to this under oath in a criminal trial.

The first accuser of Michael Jackson, Jordan Chandler, never gave testimony and was never cross examined. However, Michael Jackson’s criminal defense lawyers Susan Yu and Thomas Mesereau have publicly stated that they prepared for over 500 witnesses to take the stand in Jackson’s defense. These documents are public record and you can pull it from the court house. In their witness list, they have many people who were scheduled to testify against Jordan Chandler if in fact Jordan had testified. Of course, the FBI’s public files on Jackson state that Jordan was tracked down and that he refused to give testimony in a criminal trial.

Jordan Chandler’s official leaked transcript of his psychologist report from 1993 also states that he is terrified of giving criminal testimony. Why? Because he is afraid of cross examination.

The psychologist that interviewed Jordan Chandler when he first made allegations stated that he did not have the time to assess whether he thought the child was being truthful. He did, however, ask Jordan Chandler if he had dealt with any fears of any kind… in relation to child sexual abuse, obviously. In the transcripts, Jordan (not understanding the doctor’s question), states he is afraid of cross examination only.

Jordan Chandler’s mother June Chandler testified under oath in 2005’s criminal trial. In her testimony, she states she never witnessed any abuse, and she also goes on to state that she never felt she was being kept out of areas of Michael Jackson’s home. She states she was allowed access everywhere at every point in time. She also states that she hasn’t spoken to her son in over a decade, because Jordan Chandler sought legal emancipation at 14 and won.

This doesn’t mean June Chandler wasn’t complicit in the abuse hoax, because she most certainly was, but let’s establish the facts, anon. She testified and was always with her son.

The next mother is Janet Arvizo, who was by all accounts a career criminal, lol. She made false sexual abuse allegations against a JC Penny store, she and her kids tried to extort other celebrities before Jackson, she was guilty of committing welfare fraud. Need I go on? Janet Arvizo wasn’t just always with her kids at Neverland, but she was going on lavish spa trips and shopping sprees by stealing Jackson’s credit cards and running them up. She then tried to claim Jackson was holding her and her kids hostage, despite these trips being caught on CCTV footage. Be serious.

The next mother of an accuser we can bring up is Joy Robson, Wade Robson’s mother. Joy Robson also testified under oath in Jackson’s defense. She stated the media were offering her hundreds of thousands of dollars to change her story.

Don’t believe me, anon? Here, read the actual transcripts for a change. Joy Robson is FAR from the only person that has stated things like this in the past. There are dozens of people that corroborate what she is saying about the media.

Joy Robson had this to say too, when the prosecution tried to make up lies that Michael Jackson owned nude photos of boys and specifically of her son.

The prosecution not only didn’t have evidence that pictures like this existed, but they outright refused to provide the pictures even when given full authority to decide what was entered into the evidence pool for the trial.

Of course, Joy Robson has since changed her tune, but only after Wade made allegations after Michael died! Please think for a moment about what that entails. You have people changing their stories against a dead man who cannot defend himself or fight back against what they say. They’re making allegations for crimes he was found not guilty of in life. They’re making allegations for crimes that there is no corroborative evidence of.

In Wade Robson’s litigation, he was found to have been communicating with his mother and guilter websites to create his abuse stories. Here is one such piece of evidence found in discovery.

“I have several versions. I will let you know if I think it is somerhing that will benefit you.”

How many versions does the fucking truth need? The answer should be one!

Also, this Grand Canyon trip is another lie Wade spins. Joy Robson testified under oath not once, not twice, but THREE SEPARATE TIMES that Wade Robson was WITH HER on this Grand Canyon trip, and never left alone with Michael. THREE TIMES! Over the time span of decades!!!!! But she says a different story for cameras. 🤔

Michael Jackson did not hang out with random kids he did not know at his house alone. The entire families were literally there and testified under oath to such. Please stop misrepresenting the established facts of these cases.

Also, OP, Michael Jackson didn’t pay the Chandler family because Evan demanded money. Let’s not disregard the actual facts of what happened to Jackson. He was legally maliciously railroaded by the Chandler family, who used California state law at the time to push their civil lawsuit ahead of a criminal proceeding. Jackson was ordered by the judge overseeing both criminal and civil to give legal deposition in the civil suit while the criminal investigation was pending.

This violated Jackson’s constitutional rights. His right to remain silent, his right to an impartial jury, his right to a fair trial, etc. Let’s not downplay the severity of what was done to him.

Jackson’s legal team went to the judge to fight this numerous times. The judge continued to demand deposition which is again, UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Jackson was then saved by the California earthquake, wherein his legal team attempted to fight the judge AGAIN! The judge still refused, and less than 24 hours before Jackson would have been forced to give legal deposition, he settled the civil lawsuit which was over negligence, wherein he states in no uncertain terms he is not guilty of any wrongdoing.

The allegation of the Chandler family drugging Jordan Chandler also was never found out by the FBI. This claim came directly from the Chandler’s.

Not only did they write about drugging Jordan in a published book they wrote in 2004, but they AND the dental assistant fed suggestive interviews to the media in 1993 and 1994 about drugging Jordan Chandler. They went on to imply they used Sodium Amytal to drug Jordan. Jordan Chandler went illegally into his father’s custody claiming Michael Jackson never abused him. A month later, illegally held in his father’s custody and drugged by the father’s own admission, he claims he was abused.

Also, Jordan Chandler remained under his father’s control according to many court documents filed by the step mother and by Jordan Chandler himself. The step mother alleged in divorce proceedings that Evan leeched on his son’s settlement money, that Jordan ignored her and his step siblings just like Evan, and she alleged that Evan was abusing Jordan mentally. Jordan, in 2005 while the trial was in preparation, filed a restraining order against Evan Chandler, stating he was struck over the head with a barbell weight, and then strangled. He stated his father had attempted to murder him.

Let’s not make the defense of Jackson harder by misrepresenting the events or only giving partial explanations.

[dukeofdelirium]

full offense cuz it is actually so vile and genuinely disturbing how ppl speak on Michael Jackson’s appearance. they continue to dehumanize him and feed into this bizarre caricature of what he was all because he had autoimmune diseases. they make jokes about how they have a “phobia” over him and it’s actually so disgusting because you’re literally acting like the man wasn’t a human being, but rather some subhuman bestial thing worthy of being scared of. like… so you’re afraid of a black man because he’s fucking disabled? wtf???

he had a fucking skin disease. he had discoid lupus which was why he had nasal surgeries, you ignorant fucks. he was just trying to look as “normal” as possible while being under constant scrutiny. I don’t know what is so difficult to understand about this topic, or why people continue to deny the reality of it. there are medical records proving such to all of this, and these things were discussed in court on live TV after Michael Jackson was murdered.

it’s fucked up the way people bully and dehumanize him even in death. like, he’s fucking dead and even that isn’t enough for y’all or something. idgi

[dukeofdelirium]

also, this whole notion that Michael Jackson was “ashamed” of his race or wanted to be “white” is tabloid trash.

Michael was very proud to be black, and his culture is woven into his artistry from his music to his dance movements. Did you know that MJ regularly bought the rights to black artists music and then gave it back to them for free so that they wouldn’t be owned by the record companies? Probably not, cuz why would you idiots care about truth? Did you know he regularly went to Africa and literally ruled over an African kingdom? Did you know that his song They Don’t Care About Us was banned nation wide for its depiction of police brutality and lyrics? Did you know that the tabloid media labeling him “Jacko” is a racist term that can be traced all the way back to the 1800’s? Again, probably not because y’all don’t care to research anything beyond tabloid bullshit.

Mike loved the fact he was black. He was proud and vocal about it till the day he died, and he accomplished things the world said he never would because of the color of his skin. I won’t let y’all diminish or try to take that away with your half-assed rewrite of history

[mokozroach]

i love how everyone made michael jackson out to be a complete freak just for being whimsical like god forbid a grown man climb a tree

[-intheround]

[pas-une-ange-deactivated2014080]

relevant

[venus-meanest]

People love to forget Michael Jackson’s blackness

[bagjuicemami]

people love to think that Michael Jackson forgot his blackness

[wow-suchbree-veryblog-blog]

People love to pretend to forget that Michael Jackson’s autopsy results showed that he DID have a skin disease and never “dyed” his skin.

[spookyloop]

People also love to revel in rumours and concentrate on the private life of celebrities instead of their actual message. Michael Jackson was a proud black man who spoke against racism, poverty, homelessness, the lack of education, hurting nature, war, and tabloid culture which distracts people from bigger issues. (Look up especially the second verse of Tabloid Junkie, it’s as relevant as the above gifs of They Don’t Care About Us.)

He not only spoke against these things but he did his everything to spread the message and constantly practiced what he preached and used his money to make a difference in people’s lives. Yet people choose to ignore that and use him as the butt of a joke.

[dukeofdelirium]

You should know when it is your place to speak because I am going to prove you wrong @fuglyjeans and don’t even think about whining in a potential response, because you opened yourself up to this by lying on my post and with complete conviction too!

“There’s actually a lot of evidence” no there isn’t and I don’t need to listen to a fucking PODCAST to know that. Want to know how I know? Because I’ve pulled every god damn court document that exists on Michael Jackson straight from the source and have studied his cases for over 12 damn years.

Don’t fucking come onto my shit telling me to do research when you’re recommending random ass podcasts as valid study sessions for the most disgraceful witch hunt carried out by the American judicial system in the last 32 years.

The child you’re referring to is Jordan Chandler. Say his damn name or shut up. I bet you didn’t even know his name before commenting this stupid shit. Complete lie you made up, btw. Let’s get into it, shall we?

Jordan Chandler accurately described absolutely fuck all! Wanna know how we KNOW? Because not only did the police officer that interviewed Chandler state that he said Jackson was CIRCUMCISED which his official PUBLIC AUTOPSY REPORT DISPROVES, but the Chandler Family’s fucking lawyer moved to BAR these photographs of Jackson from court!

FYI, because you clearly seem to need it: The Smoking Gun was a media mouthpiece for the prosecution in 2005’s trial. They deleted this article after Jackson died and his autopsy disproved what the officer said.

Hmmm… what’s that I spy with my little eye?

Hmmmmm.

Wow, shocking. Also, the idea of “splotches” is fucking irrelevant. 1) it was literally never proven to be true that the child could describe certain markings and 2) Jackson had fucking vitiligo which everyone on planet earth knew by that point (meaning markings on his skin were ever changing) so no matter what the child said, the prosecution could try to explain it whether it was right or wrong or “relatively close” as Sneddon put it, therefore it can’t be believed beyond a reasonable doubt and 3) the cops would absolutely ask if Jackson was circumcised. This would be the first thing an alleged victim of SA is asked about a male perpetrator. Jordan Chandler had a 50/50 chance of getting it right. He got it fucking wrong.

Cope.

They also brought Katherine Jackson to speak before the grand juries to ask her whether her son had plastic surgery to alter the way his dick looked. Oh yeah, sounds like we have a winner here, boys!

Not only did they not want the photographs to be shown because it disproved what the child said, but there was obviously not a fucking match because if it HAD BEEN, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN PROBABLE CAUSE AND CORROBORATING EVIDENCE!

Do you honest to god think this means nothing or something? Or are you just clueless to the facts? This would be corroborating, which means this would be grounds for arrest, which means 2 grand juries would absolutely have indicted Jackson had it been a match. Trying to explain this to you is like talking to a toddler or something. Use your brain.

The Chandler family originally had Gloria Allred as their attorney. She gave a public press conference where she stated she had 0 interest in a civil case and only cared about criminal Justice. 24 hours later? They fired her and replaced her with another attorney that cared about getting money from Jackson. This attorney used legal trickery and loopholes to force Jackson into a corner, by arguing that the child was 14 and thus too young and might forget if he didn’t have his case heard as soon as possible in a civil proceeding. This was what led to the civil settlement and the violation of Jackson’s constitutional rights.

You idiots think you’re so damn smart and knowledgeable about Michael Jackson because you listened to some circle jerk discussion on YouTube or some shit. And then you make complete fools of yourselves for everyone to see when you try to speak to people like me who know every detail of said cases. Fucking embarrassing. Jackson was not only never arrested in 1993 or 1994 during the police investigation into these allegations from Jordan Chandler (which he would have been had the description matched), but he also was never indicted by two separate grand juries that oversaw all “evidence” that chucklefuck Tom Sneddon had, which was fuck all.

Jordan Chandler evaded all attempts to make him testify against Jackson. Jackson’s legal defense prepared for over 500 witnesses and dozens of these witnesses on the list were there to testify against Jordan Chandler had he shown up.

“Y’all can’t wrap your heads around victims blah blah blah” don’t ever fucking presume to tell me shit about child sexual abuse. I am literally a male survivor of CSA. I know very well how it feels to be sexually abused and I know how it feels to struggle with memory problems.

Don’t even try to make an excuse to me about it, because Jordan Chandler never said he had memory issues to begin with. Neither did Jackson’s next accuser Gavin Arvizo. He was asked by the psychologist that interviewed him if he struggled with memory or with fears relating to CSA as well in 1993, and you want to know what he said? He said he had no fears of any kind, no struggles, and only that he was afraid of cross examination.

Sit the fuck down and shut the hell up. Consider yourself served and silenced.