In Italia non siamo capaci a gestire cose “banali” come strade, ferrovie e spazzatura, e vogliamo metterci a fare buchi nel mare a cercare petrolio.
Questo non è progresso, è SUICIDIO.
Se avete la memoria corta, o siete troppo giovani per ricordarvelo, andatevi a documentare su cosa sia successo in Messico, nel 2010, e cosa tale disastro abbia comportato, anche in termini di salute delle popolazioni costiere. Ci hanno impiegato mesi a chiudere il “buco” da cui fuoriusciva greggio ( oltre 700 milioni di litri fuoriusciti ), e le conseguenze, quanto meno a distanza di quattro anni, erano ancora ben evidenti.
Non è questione di essere ecologisti o che altro. E’ questione di avere del sale in zucca per comprendere che non siamo una nazione da pozzi petroliferi ( anche perché di petrolio ne abbiamo nemmeno chissà quanto ).
Andate a votare.
APPENDICE:
Vi riporto l’Abstract di alcuni studi scientifici rintracciati su PubMed (il “Google” della scienza ), riguardanti il disastro della Deepwater Horizon e il suo impatto sulla salute ( tralasciando la miriade di studi ecologici/ di biologia marina, disponibili sull’argomento ).
Ambient air concentrations exceeded health-based standards for fine particulate matter and benzene during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.
Nance E1, King D1, Wright B2, Bullard RD1.
The Deepwater Horizon oil spill is considered one of the largest marine oil spills in the history of the United States. Air emissions associated with the oil spill caused concern among residents of Southeast Louisiana. The purpose of this study was to assess ambient concentrations of benzene (n=3,887) and fine particulate matter (n=102,682) during the oil spill and to evaluate potential exposure disparities in the region. Benzene and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations in the targeted parishes were generally higher following the oil spill, as expected. Benzene concentrations reached 2 to 19 times higher than background, and daily exceedances of PM2.5 were 10 to 45 times higher than background. Both benzene and PM2.5 concentrations were considered high enough to exceed public health criteria, with measurable exposure disparities in the coastal areas closer to the spill and clean-up activities. These findings raise questions about public disclosure of environmental health risks associated with the oil spill. The findings also provide a science-based rationale for establishing health-based action levels in future disasters.
IMPLICATIONS:
Benzene and particulate matter monitoring during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill revealed that ambient air quality was a likely threat to public health and that residents in coastal Louisiana experienced significantly greater exposures than urban residents. Threshold air pollution levels established for the oil spill apparently were not used as a basis for informing the public about these potential health impacts. Also, despite carrying out the most comprehensive air monitoring ever conducted in the region, none of the agencies involved provided integrated analysis of the data or conclusive statements about public health risk. Better information about real-time risk is needed in future environmental disasters.
Concentrations in human blood of petroleum hydrocarbons associated with the BP/Deepwater Horizon oil spill, Gulf of Mexico.
Sammarco PW1, Kolian SR2, Warby RA3, Bouldin JL4, Subra WA5, Porter SA6,2,7.
Author information
Abstract
During/after the BP/Deepwater Horizon oil spill, cleanup workers, fisherpersons, SCUBA divers, and coastal residents were exposed to crude oil and dispersants. These people experienced acute physiological and behavioral symptoms and consulted a physician. They were diagnosed with petroleum hydrocarbon poisoning and had blood analyses analyzed for volatile organic compounds; samples were drawn 5-19 months after the spill had been capped. We examined the petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in the blood. The aromatic compounds m,p-xylene, toluene, ethylbenzene, benzene, o-xylene, and styrene, and the alkanes hexane, 3-methylpentane, 2-methylpentane, and iso-octane were detected. Concentrations of the first four aromatics were not significantly different from US National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey/US National Institute of Standards and Technology 95th percentiles, indicating high concentrations of contaminants. The other two aromatics and the alkanes yielded equivocal results or significantly low concentrations. The data suggest that single-ring aromatic compounds are more persistent in the blood than alkanes and may be responsible for the observed symptoms. People should avoid exposure to crude oil through avoidance of the affected region, or utilizing hazardous materials suits if involved in cleanup, or wearing hazardous waste operations and emergency response suits if SCUBA diving. Concentrations of alkanes and PAHs in the blood of coastal residents and workers should be monitored through time well after the spill has been controlled.
The Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Physical Health among Adult Women in Southern Louisiana: The Women and Their Children’s Health (WaTCH) Study.
Peres LC1, Trapido E1, Rung AL1, Harrington DJ2, Oral E3, Fang Z3, Fontham E1, Peters ES1.
Author information
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
The Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill (DHOS) is the largest oil spill in U.S. history, negatively impacting Gulf Coast residents and the surrounding ecosystem. To date, no studies have been published concerning physical health outcomes associated with the DHOS in the general community.
OBJECTIVES:
To characterize individual DHOS exposure using survey data and to examine the association between DHOS exposure and physical health.
METHODS:
Baseline data from 2,126 adult women residing in Southern Louisiana and enrolled in the Women and Their Children’s Health study were analyzed. Exploratory factor analysis was used to characterize DHOS exposure. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the associations between DHOS exposure and physical health symptoms were estimated using multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS:
A two factor solution was identified as the best fit for DHOS exposure: physical/environmental exposure and economic exposure. High physical/environmental exposure was significantly associated with all of the physical health symptoms, with the strongest associations for burning in nose, throat or lungs (OR = 4.73; 95% CI: 3.10, 7.22); sore throat (OR = 4.66; 95% CI: 2.89, 7.51); dizziness (OR = 4.21; 95% CI: 2.69, 6.58); and wheezing (OR = 4.20; 95% CI: 2.86, 6.17). Women who had high economic exposure were significantly more likely to report wheezing (OR = 1.92; 95% CI: 1.32, 2.79); headaches (OR = 1.81; 95% CI: 1.41, 2.58); watery, burning, itchy eyes (OR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.20, 2.16); and stuffy, itchy, runny nose (OR = 1.56; 95% CI: 1.16, 2.08).
CONCLUSIONS:
Among Southern Louisiana women, both physical/environmental and economic exposure to the DHOS was associated with an increase in self-reported physical health outcomes. Additional longitudinal studies of this unique cohort are needed to elucidate the impact of the DHOS on short and long-term human health.