a comparison of two musicals
Thanks to his musical genius Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart became a part of the international cultural heritage. You will hardly remember another historical personality who has received two different representations of his life and destiny in the musical world. It could happen mostly from love to his divine music or only its popularization as well as interest in his course of life.
Being European products, both pieces – «Mozart! Das Musical» and «Mozart l'Opera rock» have got the noticable impact of the Broadway ideas. Telling us a life story of the same person, they remain entertaining and importunate in their own way. The worldwide success of the French version made people forget the original Viennese production, but it has been reestablished to a very, very remarkable one.
I have seen them both and can’t help comparing them. Let’s check what has turned out.
Checking the French version, you can guess that the main issue is:
To become a great composer, you need to be able to leave your family, to face the hostility and envy, to overcome all your evel-wishers who will try to prevent you from showing the world your absolute irrefutable talent. At the end, you will stay forgiven and beloved.
The Austrian musical says, however:
To reach the gold of the stars, you have to sacrifice everything you have: your family, your own wishes – to experience both the blessing and the damnation of your talent, to loose once your faith in yourself and to remain alone at the end after having confronted with everybody who has tried to prevent you from fulfilling your fucking destiny.
2. The level of the conflict
The French Mozart is a person mainly confronting his rivals, contesters, who are afraid of his potential promotion. On the way to his success, he’s also arguing with his father, a little bit with Colloredo in the very beginning, his first love who betrays him and again with envious persons.
He doubts the sincerity of human beings, his wife and friends, but never seems to doubt himself. It’s such a persistent young man, freedom-loving, very sympathetic at all.
His antagonist, however, is very self-doubting person, which covers the lack in the intrapersonal conflict of the main character.
The Austrian Mozart challenges everything. He seems to be very self-confident and even irritative. He’s longing for freedom like he has just finished with many years of obedience and servility as a little porcelain child (whose shade has been following him for longer). The conflict is three-level and includes the hostile society, his father and Colloredo and himself as little Amadeus who personifies his genius and fate. He’s very open-minded and life-loving with and w/o connecting it with women, entertainments and music. He’s very human.
3. The relation to the historic facts
There are a lot of artistic and commercial fictions in the Mozart l’opera rock, e.g. Mozarts big love to Aloysia Weber or, of course, his rivalry with Salieri and the envy of the last to his genius. We know how successful this idea was before the musical has appeared and where it comes from – whether it’s the little tragedy by Pushkin or the American movie «Amadeus” – the idea of the confrontation of the genius and smallness is eternal.
The german-speaking Mozart is more natural and history-based with the trades of character lead to their maximum. Of course, as we might know, his sister wasn’t such a nice and lovely person to him as well as his main opponent Colloredo wasn’t that obstinate fan of his music – but his relationship with his wife and his love to life, I dare to guess, is very correct.
Some fans of the French musical like to repeat how much advantage the musical’s got by using the main (and the most popular) Mozarts melodies. However, the musical was created as a rocking one – I would add – it’s glam rock – but some arias are rather of pop-music – even classic music sounds there too pop-opiented.
The music by Silvester Levay sounds even more classic w/o being classic – clearer and brighter, perfectly matching the main character. That’s why all the arias sound more convincing: nothing prevents the power of voice and lets the artist show his best.
5. The feelings the main character calls by the audience
Here we can’t decide w/o referring to the actors playing their parts.
Mikelangelo Loconte: his Mozart, as I’ve written, is very sympathetic – even being very familiar – you follow him like there already have passed many years after his death and his talent is the worldwide heritage. The setting doesn’t show the worst sides of his living – only suggests them like the reason of his mother’s and his own illness and death.
But you don’t know how to treat the Austrian Mozart. He seems to be powerful and genius and childish, irresponsible, too credulous. He represents many good sides in the person: kindness, liberality – inspires with his openness and spurns with his heedlessness and egoism. And that is the goal Oedo Kuipers has reached!
To add at the end, both artist don’t look alike the historical prototype, but they play their parts very good and sing good, too – and as the experience has shown, a good-singing actor is better than good-looking one.
Both musicals have found their audience. We can’t deny the success of the very organic looking commercial French version as well as the quality of the Austrian one. The very last criteria (or the first?) is what our hearts speak for. My heart has chosen the less popular Austrian Mozart– and what about yours?