People don't have ideas, ideas have people @mindgyre - Tumblr Blog

unstumpabledeplorable

yourunclejingo

I would love this one to really get around.

juvo45-deactivated20180715

virtue signaling from inside a luxury gated resort is peak leftism

friendly-neighborhood-ehrhardt

oh thats nothing.

if you really wanna look down the rabbit hole:

mindgyre

this is for the dumb cunt defending hillary clinton on my other post. Haiti looks like this and she's complicit

mindgyre

The world might be all kinds of fucked up, but Hillary Clinton will never be president and she knows it, and she’s bitter as all hell about it, and I think that’s beautiful. 😇

rideofbrunhelga

Imagine still being obsessed with hating Hillary Clinton almost a year post-election, who’s endless qualifications and respect would have our country in a much different place today.

But yes, continue making fun of her for being bitter. I would be bitter too if I worked my ass off in public service almost my entire career, to lose to a reality tv star who has no experience, no moral conscience or intelligence level, who ran the most despicable, outrageous campaign in US History.

“People may be dying senselessly and maybe we will have nuclear war but at least HILLARY isn’t president” - what a fucking silver lining. Shut the fuck up.

mindgyre

her and her hubby and her organization pillaged haiti

but if you want to white knight for the clintons, that's your prerogative

so people on here haven't changed at all? unsurprising. came back to check on a whim and worthless cunts are still being worthless cunts.

mindgyre

anyone else having beta key troubles?

mindgyre

@vivec-is-my-homie yeah, the site was throwing a lot of 503 errors, and I got one while I was making my account. Now it says my key has already been used or doesn’t exist. @nautilusbomb waited a few minutes and got in just fine, and @chainsawteaparty says they posted an update explaining what went wrong.

anyone else having beta key troubles?

#writscrib #writscrib beta

akumeoy

hey everybody, it’s time for the mystery box. the first clue is that it’s something green.

fair-fae

My boyfriend sent me this I am crying

africanmani-deactivated20170514

arbitrary-stag

This is so pure

trashcanbees-deactivated2019120

According to the Bible, you must marry your rapist~

You must have missed the section of Genesis where Dinah was raped by Schehem who then tried to marry her. Her brothers said he could only if he and all his men circumcised themselves, and then while they were recovering from their injuries her brothers slaughtered them all as revenge.

apenitentialprayer

Okay, so a few things here: 1) Let’s get the unfortunate one out of the way first; while I’m sure many modern readers (myself included) get a bit of pleasure from Levi and Simeon killing Shechem, after what he did to Dinah, the Genesis narrative doesn’t seem to look at this incident as a positive thing. Simeon and Levi did, after all, wipe out an entire town. Jacob rebukes them for doing this, for now they are “repugnant to the inhabitants of the land,” (Genesis 34:30-31), and on his deathbed curses them for their actions (49:5-7). So why would killing the rapist elicit a response like this? Probably because it contravenes the principle of “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a claw for a claw” (Exodus 21:23-25). While this principle is later superseded by Christ, for this time period it was extremely important: it was a way of preventing the escalation of feuds and tribal warfare; we see a similar idea in the Islamic concept of diya, or “blood money:” you repay/get repaid the harm that was done, and then you put whatever happened behind you. By using deceit, murdering all the town’s men, looting the houses, stealing the cattle, and carrying off the town’s women and children for themselves (Genesis 34:28-29), Levi and Simeon did not act in a way that was viewed positively by whoever compiled Genesis into its current form. 2) Now, back to our “women must marry the rapist” thing. I assume this is a reference to Deuteronomy 22:28-29: “If a man comes upon a young woman, a virgin who is not betrothed, seizes her and lies with her, and they are discovered, the man who lay with her shall give the young woman’s father fifty silver shekels and she will be his wife, because he has violated her. He may not divorce her as long as he lives.” So, funny story about this verse. It’s actually meant to punish the rapist. The rapist is expected to take on the role of the husband, and all the obligations that entails, and is not allowed to divorce his wife. The important thing implicit in this commandment is that while the man cannot divorce his wife, the woman is allowed to divorce the husband. She gets to keep the payment (which, by the way, is hers, and not her father’s, if she is at an age of majority) if she so chooses to divorce. Here’s a Jewish source for this. There’s also a debate as to whether these verses actually refer to rape, or consensual seduction. This is possible, because in the passage right before this one (22:23-27), a man who is described as a rapist in far less ambiguous terms is punished by being stoned to death. That being said, I tend to agree with those who say that verses 28-29 are also describing rape, and not just sex outside of marriage.