.

I'm matter but I don't matter I can feel my skull shatter

[bumblee-stumblee]

[sichorean]

HOLD ABUSERS ACCOUNTABLE.

I am *so* tired of the "well she stayed/got into the relationship" argument.

You have *no idea* what is going on in someone else's relationship.

[moodboardsbysarah]

honestly I am anti contraception. Like, I'm not gonna go on a campaign to ban it but it has undeniably had negative impacts on society.

Thanks to birth control there's way more people having sex willy-nilly because they can get away with it. This is leading to a rise in toxic and unstable relationships that often result in children anyway.

Promiscuous one-night stands aren't great, but they're also the least of my concerns. Relationships where people have sex before establishing commitment are much more concerning. I believe these sorts of relationships are the reason for the rise in single early parenthood (I'm making "early parenthood" clear because I don't care about seperated couples with older kids). imo such relationships didn't occur as frequently in a world before contraception, where every sexual encounter felt like an existential risk. On the rare occasions when such unstable relationships did occur... Well... a baby would be born and those people would be forced to either get their act together and marry, or split up. The dynamic of having sex on the third date wasn't normalised and encouraged like it is today.

The contraception lovers argue, "birth control gave women more freedom!" And yeah, I guess it did. It gave women more freedom to...

a) poison our bodies with artificial hormones and IUD complications

b) have sex with random strangers and men who want to use us for sex

c) get more strongly pressured into sex than we already are by boyfriends and dates, because muh condoms will solve everything

d) get pregnant to said men anyway because no form of birth control is 100% reliable

The only benefit I see to contraception is the Plan B pill allowing women who are raped to get protected from pregnancy. And the regular birth control pill is useful for treating some health problems, but there's no reason why this pill couldn't have been marketed as an endometriosis treatment or a period stopper. Instead they called it "birth control" and gave it to any woman who wanted to have more pregnancy-less sex with men. they also prescribe it for acne and depression and literally any hormonal problem a woman has, which is medical malpractice best discussed in another post.

Contraception lovers also argue, "but without birth control, so many more unwanted children would be born!" And I'm like er... That's not what I'm seeing at all. I'm seeing more unwanted children being born than ever before, more single motherhood, more of all that stuff in a pro-contraception world. Contraception is not 100% effective and as I went through, it is causing the formation of unstable relationships because people are having sex way too quickly. People in these unstable relationships might start out using contraception then choose to have unprotected sex and have kids.

The worst thing contraception has done is it has made people start to see sex as a human right and a necessity, when really it's something you should only do when you're lucky enough to have a deep loyal connection with someone. "Sex isn't that big of a deal!" Men cry nowadays because they have contraception "protecting" women from the consequences of sex. Men are acting more entitled to sex than ever. Now that they have condoms, women they're dating don't have as valid of an excuse to say no anymore. Before contraception you only had sex with men you felt comfortable getting pregnant and this was basic common sense. After contraception... Well this logic doesn't hold up anymore. if you don't feel fully comfortable with this guy, well suck it up girlie because he can just wear a condom, it's not like you might get pregnant or anything! Sex isn't a big deal! And if he hates condoms, then you're expected to mutilate your body with IUDs or birth control pills to cater to his needs. If you don't, some other girl will. So yeah, I don't see at all how contraception empowers women in relationships with men. All I see is it gives us less sexual bargaining power and more pressure to "put out" against our will.

And this isn't to say I want contraception banned, because we do need Plan B pills available in case women are raped. but I want the narrative that contraception is empowering and freeing to fucking stop.

If you are heterosexual... then don't have sex with people who you aren't willing to raise children with. End of story, point blank, period. I don't care if you used all the contraception or birth control in the world. If you lie down with the opposite sex and you or your partner gets pregnant, that's on you guys. Consenting to heterosex means consenting to pregnancy.

[moodboardsbysarah]

So tiresome when grown women act like they don't know that having sex with men creates babies.

You didn't just get pregnant because a man decided you would get pregnant. You got pregnant because you consented to have sex with that man. You are not a victim of your pregnancy or your fetus or your baby daddy's existence. You made choices. Shut the fuck up

[life-spire]

@ raw.nato

[r2x2]

Whenever someone talks about Zionism as "Israel's right to exist" or "Jewish self-determination", I'm always reminded of what Noam Chomsky said about the slogan "Support our troops."

[grinderhash-deactivated20231003]

no i havent seen that critically acclaimed movie with significant relevance to culture. no yeah, still working through bad stuff from other decades

[screenshotsofdespair]

[mclennonyaoi]

you ever know someone and you think “god i love you. i wish we could’ve known eachother when we were carefree and 11. i wish we could’ve played together as kids”

[mclennonyaoi]

a friend of mine walked me through their childhood diaries and god i wish i could’ve given them a hug. i wish we could’ve played with stuffed animals together

[neckkiss]

MILK AND HONEY.

[moodboardsbysarah]

stop sympathizing with moms treating their daughters like shit because "moms have it hard". The same bitches who complain that daughters are parentified are the ones who continue to parentify us by asking us to keep feeling sorry for our parasitic mothers, otherwise we're bad feminists who don't stand in solidarity with other women.

All of this feminist shit about how women are obligated to care for the sisterhood and validate other women's feelings at all times, whilst men are expected to be useless savages who go around causing harm and not sympathizing with women... This is literally just rebranding the old bullshit of girls being given more responsibilities and less freedoms and higher expectations than boys.

Reason 102938 why I insist that feminism is not different to patriarchy, it is just an extension of it.

[moodboardsbysarah]

glory to monogamy

People (mostly feminists) who push "heterosexual monogamy is oppressive to women" are absolutely gross. I don't care what your stupid fat cult leaders wrote in their radfem books. PATRIARCHAL RELIGION is oppressive to women, not monogamy itself. Many women desire monogamy where the wife and the husband are equal. If this wasn't the case, patriarchy wouldn't have been successful for so long.

Most women prefer being monogamous in a Christian patriarchy, to being in any type of degenerate polycule. Egalitarian monogamy was not seen as an option for most periods in history. It was a battle between radical, tyrannical order (Christian patriarchy) and degenerate savagery (free-for-all polyamory, warlords trying to enforce polygamy). Given these two shitty options, the majority of women understandably sided with the one that wouldn't keep them in cages as sex slaves. Or the one that wouldn't leave them exposed to horny sex addicts 24/7, fending for themselves in a wild west world where no one was truly there to protect them. Because in polyamory where everyone loves everyone, no one does.

Any kind of polyamory which involves men, puts women and children more at risk of violence. This is true whether it is polygamy or polyandry or ~egalitarian bisexual polyamory~. it is all more dangerous for women than heterosexual monogamy. Look at the polyandrous woman in Florida who had a baby while living in a house with her 4 male concubines and tell me about how empowering polyandry is for women (in case you don't know, one of the moidlets snapped and violently abused the baby. The baby girl was almost killed). Polyamory undermines the sacred power of a two-person bond and a lot of lesbians are repulsed by the idea of sharing their wife too. I can't speak about lesbian polyamory since I'm not a lesbian, but I will say that a) no amount of "yer a pickme" "yer male aligned" "yer a male loving whore" will convince me to participate and b) all the real lesbians I know find it gross.

I recently saw a straight-turned-"lesbian" feminist and all her followers, say that women who don't want to live in communities with a super high female-male ratio and share their husband around with 5 other women, are "male aligned pickmes". So we literally have man-hating feminists going full circle and promoting Mormon polygamy, where women are shamed for wanting a 1-1 loyal committed relationship with a man. No, the superior choice is to share him! 1 man having 5 wives is totes feminist and empowering when it's a lesbian woman dictating the social standard!!!11

This sort of shit is why people say feminists hate heterosexual women. Feminists of all types have lost their fucking minds.

Monogamy is the superior sexual arrangement whether you are straight or gay, male or female. If you promote poly- anything you are a broken degenerate.

[moodboardsbysarah]

The whole "women should be fat to repulse moids" movement is utterly pathetic. I say this as a slightly overweight woman myself. I'm not even that fat, I'm only slightly above 25 bmi, and I can still feel the physical effects of overweightness weighing me down. These women actually cope so hard by saying that people only lose weight and put effort into being slim because they're trying to appeal to moids. the reason I hate being fat is because I feel the extra weight getting in the way of my athletic abilities. Especially in summer. Some people actually want to climb trees, pull up their own body weight, cycle, surf, do flips, do backbends, swim, have bodies that can walk a few miles without fainting. After gaining 10kg I can feel it weighing down my knee and ankle joints when I walk. Also when I walk my thighs chafe against each other which is super uncomfortable. I want a thigh gap and I want slimness for my own sake. I understand that being slim is really difficult with the stressful lives we lead which are full of poison food and poison vaccines we received as children. I understand that people ruin slimness by sexualizing it and making weight loss all about how attractive you are as a woman. Still doesn't change the fact that being slim improves your quality of life by making you capable of doing more things. if you don't recognise being slim and fit as an objectively good ideal for everyone to aspire to, something's wrong with you.

[screenshotsofdespair]

[moodboardsbysarah]

Civilization really needs to hurry up and collapse

[sarhoskedi-deactivated20241211]

[neverlvnd]

X

[moodboardsbysarah]

Feminists have also been memed by the patriarchy they descended from into believing Femininity is a worthless slave role and Masculinity is superior.

Literally, the only difference between feminism and patriarchy is that feminism says, "women must reject femininity because femininity is an inferior servant role, and become masculine and compete with men to gain self worth" whilst patriarchy says "women must accept the fact that they are feminine and find a man to serve to gain self worth, because femininity is an inferior servant role".

BOTH ideologies are built on the degradation, devaluation and erasure of the Feminine! And guess what, both ideologies' greatest enemy is spiritual "woowoo" women who dare to embrace the power of Femininity and believe that Femininity can be something other than a humiliated slave role. Patriarchy calls such women "demonic" and "subversive" and burns us at the stake whilst feminism calls us "delusional pickmes" (essentially slut shaming us for not hating ourselves) and shames us for not defining our worth by the masculine slave system where its all about money and job opportunities and competing with toxic masculine values.

Any woman who calls herself a "feminist witch" is a fucking LARPer lmao. You can't be a witch whilst hating the essential principle of being a witch (femininity and feminine power). Calling yourself a feminist witch is like calling yourself a masculinity-rejecting warrior.

[moodboardsbysarah]

radical feminism is so ironic because they end up reinforcing all the misogyny they complain about.

The main one is the "women are held to much higher standards than men!" meanwhile rad feminists turn around and nitpick every minor thing a woman does, because it's possibly "contributing to female oppression". Whilst men are allowed to roam free and be degenerates and do whatever they want without any criticism from feminism. Rad Feminists expect men to be worthless degenerates, so as a result men don't get criticized or pressured to be anything other than worthless degenerates. Men are not pressured with any obligation to abstain from sex or police themselves to help out some downtrodden collective, they are not bullied mercilessly by the bitchy women who call themselves feminists for their personal choices no matter how degenerate those choices are. Only women are bullied and harassed by feminists for their personal choices (i.e. being with a man, daring to take pride in being feminine, criticizing a woman) because feminists have such high moral expectations of the sex they glorify.

Dare I say this is misandry backfiring on women, lmao.

It's SO funny and also sad how literally every female empowerment movement, whether lib feminism or rad feminism or whatever kind of feminism, ends up reinforcing the misogynistic notion that men have no obligation to anyone but themselves because they're stupid animals who can't be expected to develop emotional intelligence, meanwhile women are obligated to self-sacrifice and be constantly scrutinized for The Good of Society. Basically it's rebranded "women must pay the price for men's sins". Patriarchy also puts women on a pedestal and glorifies us as being of higher moral integrity than men, which in their opinion justifies treating us more harshly than men on all levels except physical.

No kind of feminism transcends gender roles one bit. Feminism is literally rebranded patriarchy. This is fucking obvious to anyone who knows how second-wave feminism came about (banker money) and it is obvious to anyone who knows that the monetary-job system which feminism glorifies as "empowering", is a patriarchal invention based on the erasure of feminine values and the over-glorification of masculine values. And it's obvious to anyone who's put cause and effect together and seen that despite feminism being so influential in society over the past few decades, we are still living in a hellhole ruled by war and greed, nurses and teachers are still underpaid whilst worthless corporate moids are getting billions, and mothers are facing More (not less) stress and pressure than ever. It's almost like feminism is just patriarchal gender roles slightly rebranded.

"Women need to be scrutinized for the safety of all women and children! So that's why we freak out when a woman sucks dick but roll our eyes and go "hm, as expected" when a man acts like a pedo degenerate!" is the exact doctrine of patriarchal ideology.

Feminists act just as entitled to women's obedience and loyalty and purity as men who believe in patriarchal ideologies.