Idiot 1: âThereâs no âIâ in âidiotâ.â
Sensible person: âThere ⌠there is though. In fact, there are two âIâs in âidiotâ.â
Idiot 2: *Nodding sagely.* âJust like my head.â
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸
Not today Justin

Product Placement
RMH

pixel skylines
cherry valley forever
Jules of Nature
$LAYYYTER
styofa doing anything
No title available
art blog(derogatory)
ojovivo

blake kathryn

@theartofmadeline
Xuebing Du

⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ
Acquired Stardust
Game of Thrones Daily
occasionally subtle

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from Mexico
seen from Australia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Canada
seen from Italy
seen from New Zealand
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Netherlands

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United States
@morganoperandi
Idiot 1: âThereâs no âIâ in âidiotâ.â
Sensible person: âThere ⌠there is though. In fact, there are two âIâs in âidiotâ.â
Idiot 2: *Nodding sagely.* âJust like my head.â
not gonna say it again!!!!
a BOG is a wetland that is acidic
a FEN is a wetland that is alkaline
FINALLY someone said it!!!!!!!
a SWAMP is a wetland whose vegetation consists of trees or other woody plants
a MARSH is a wetland with other forms of vegetation
#A LITTLE LOUDER FOR THE PEOPLE IN THE BACK
a MANGAL is a swamp whose soil concentrates high amounts of salt and very low amounts of oxygen, supporting little else than mangrove trees
a PEATLAND is a wetland whose soil concentrates decaying organic matter, becoming peat
Oh yeah baby, keep coming at me with watery environmental states
Um no I'm pretty sure those are both switches
PARKS AND RECREATION | 4.21
Bonus:
PARKS AND REC 7.09
đĽš
Late Night at the Art Studio From my upcoming artbook, which is crowdfunding right now!
they got married btw
oh youâre not kidding
Posting this iconic piece of media that I just NEVER found online isolated except in an archived reddit thread
I never knew where this meme was from!
C) Popeye after eating a can of spinach.
D) Jackie Chan in a warehouse full of random props lying around. And he doesnât want any trouble.
They all lose to Bugs Bunny who has just declared âOf course, you realize, this means war.â
i have connected the dotsâŚ
âyou didnât connect shitâ
Iâve connected them
i so fucking smart
my mom said to me âhave you ever noticed that bugs bunny and hawkeye wear the same thingâ (the robe) and BOY did i have receipts that i have, in fact, thought of this before
#hawkeye is like what if bugs bunny had the character arc of frodo baggins
the cunt who makes my life decisions (me) and the idiot who has to live with them (also me) somehow have diametrically opposed world views how am i supposed to live like this
me sowing: the harvest will be glorious. farmers tremble before my sowing prowess. i'm the king of the hill
me reaping: why the fuck did i sow all this. what the fuck. who let me have all these seeds. why the FUCK do i own a field. what the fuck.
"they own one, maybe two or three buildings and often live off the cash flow"
I'm sorry but it's hard to emphasize with SF landlords, I really don't care. We shouldn't prioritize these families when so many are homeless
Landlord voice: "it's so hard to be rich, people want to live in houses that are empty but I can't afford to relocate them, and that person might not want to leave the house I own in a city I have visited twice"
Taxes apartments that have been vacant for longer than six months.
The obvious solution is to make it more expensive to leave the units empty than to maintain them as actual human habitations.
Clip of Lucy Dacus on the Las Culturistas podcast.
People are highlighting how well she describes how allyship sometimes comes before coming out, but I also want to put emphasis on "... the guy takes off the earring, no-one was hurt."
Sometimes a person needs to explore and experiment before coming to the conclusion that actually they're not queer at all, and that's not only perfectly okay but - in my opinion - a brilliant thing to do!
There's a real risk of saying that a person who questions their sexuality will always turn out to be queer and/or if a person questions their sexuality and turns out to be straight after all then they were faking or attention-seeking.
Having the freedom to explore, question and identify your orientation/gender should not be a luxury permitted to only the minority - that then runs the risk of the very act of questioning becoming outing one's self.
It's similar to cis people wearing pronoun pins - if only trans people wore pronoun pins then the pin suddenly becomes a clear sign to the world that the wearer is trans, which not every trans person wants to broadcast.
I personally make a point to congratulate any cishet person I meet whom I know have taken the time to question their identity, not for being progressive but for having an understanding of their identity not because society told them what they are but because they determined that for themself.
Change.org - Petition To Hire 1,000,000 People To Put Their Fingers In The Shoot Hole Of Peoplesâ Guns So They Canât Shoot Them
Itâs still gonna shoot⌠And theyâre gonna lose a finger
No. The finger blocks the bullet. We can do this
This is a gun weâre talking about. The projectile is fired using an explosion, not by compressed air of a toy gun or the elastic forces of a sling shot. People would be lucky if they only lost their finger.
The finger blocks it
The finger wonât block it - the shaft is only there for keeping the bullet straight, all the propulsion happens behind the bullet. The bullet would rip through the finger, not that many would actually fit without the victim being a child, and beyond.
The bullet would go forward a little and then hit the finger and stop itâs not that hard to understand
People are going to lose their hands. Go watch Mythbusters. They did an episode on this, the hand fucking exploded.
No, the bullet would start to go but stop at the finger. Thats basic physics. Also hands dont explode normally they did something wrong.
Why the dingleknockers would you even consider sticking your finger in the barrel of a loaded gun?? the amount of force propelling the bullet at that close of range would shatter the finger at the very least; this is a petition for 1,000,000 people to loose the use of their hands. If a bullet explodes the back of a persons skull when they shoot it in their mouth it sure as hell will explode a finger.
No the finger would stop it
Iâm loving the idiocy of this post.
Ppl with brains: ummm finger go boomâŚ
Others: no bullet stop. U no kno fisics >:V
no the finger would stop it
You guy who think the bullet would stop at the finger have never shot a gun and can volunteer to it their fingers in the barrel of my 9 mil and Iâll Iâll the trigger and see if it will stop the bullet. Dumdasses
the finger would stop it
date of origin: 28th of december, 2015.
These fuckwits are back again? Howâs it going, Nine Finger Nasty? About to turn into an Eight Finger Egghead?
@meatswitch @raptorific this is a US based site. US Americans are known for two things- obsession with guns and incredible stupidity. Had this been anyone else, Iâd say theyâre trying to fuck with us. But with US Americans, about 70% of them are dead serious about mangling their hands trying to stop a bullet.
Iâve had four years to think about it and now I think the finger would stop it
I just tested it with my buddy. It stops the bullet
âŚ.Mythbusters WELDED A METAL SPIKE into the barrel of a gun to obstruct it, something heaps stronger than a human finger (and sealed the barrel better with the filler metal used to fuse the metal spike into place and prevent the explosive gases from escaping) but even that didnât stop the bullet from doing damage.
Itâs because they didnât use a finger like I did