(1/4) If a character canonically does not feel any romantic attraction, but is never explicitly called aromantic in the text, do they count as canonically aromantic? Do they count as queer representation more generally?
Yes, they count as aromantic
They don't count as aromantic, but they DO count as queer representation
Only if the creator intended to write them that way
Only if their setting doesn't have a word for that/they wouldn't know if they were
Depends on something else
No, they don't count as aromantic or as queer representation
If a character canonically does not feel any romantic attraction, but is never explicitly called aromantic in the text, do they count as canonically aromantic? Do they count as queer representation more generally?
Yes, they count as aromantic
They don't count as aromantic, but they DO count as queer representation
Only if the creator intended to write them that way
Only if their setting doesn't have a word for it/they wouldn't know if they were
Depends on something else
No, they don't count as aromantic or as queer representation
Results
