wow this is like, totally randem XD
hey so i'm coming back to this thing from almost a year ago with a sequel
Claire Keane
Jules of Nature
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
occasionally subtle

tannertan36
No title available

roma★
wallacepolsom

JVL

No title available

Origami Around

titsay
Peter Solarz
Game of Thrones Daily
i don't do bad sauce passes
AnasAbdin

Love Begins
cherry valley forever

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Indonesia

seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Vietnam
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from Australia

seen from Indonesia
@mrhovs
wow this is like, totally randem XD
hey so i'm coming back to this thing from almost a year ago with a sequel
since i have a new pokesona i HAVE to dress him up in 80s/vaporwave type garbage lol
As someone who is studying to become a professional artist, I love "bad art" more than ever.
Ok but for real I love "bad art" so much. Sonic OCs and sparkledogs made by 13 year olds on Deviantart with MS Paint. Entire comics drawn on spare homework pages, all graphite, all used paper. Attempts at cartoons made on Powerpoint or on free/cheap video editing programs.
When I was younger I got mocked for my "bad art" and thought the only way to "repent" from my artistic sins (what nowadays is called "cringe") was to make fun in turn of others' "bad art", as if it was the curse from The Ring. It also created huge insecurities in my own artistic ability, as if it had to be "good enough" to be protected by mockery, and never showed anything again until a decade later.
It also prompted me to "get better", but there must be better ways to prompt artistic growth than through mockery. One thing my personal demon never told me, one thing I found out myself, is that there's more to art than just skill displayed. There's trying to convey what's on your mind on paper, or on screen, or on other physical materials. There's genuinity in the emotions and feelings and stories you're trying to convey. Even if that emotion is just simply "I made up a little guy in my head and I think they're very cool"
Of course, because most of this art comes from the artist's own interests and inner world and not, say, making it for money or popularity, it also means it can be incredibly niche. Specific. Self-indulgent. In other words, it means it's not art "for everybody" - it's mostly art made by its artist, for its artist. You'll find lots of "bad art" that you'll find unappealing and/or uninteresting. And that's okay! That's part of the beauty of it - the very reason this kind of art is made is because the artist wants it to exist by any means available to them - even if that means cheap, unprofessional tools. And that's where the genuinity, the passion, the "magic" comes from.
And yes, sometimes, I'll still have a laugh at "bad art". But please, understand: that laugh doesn't come from a place of mockery. I do not intend to ridicule, or make artists feel bad for something they made. I might find their art unintentionally funny because of their lack of artistic or storytelling skills stops them from truly conveying what they intended, but rest assured, it's a laugh of celebration, of enjoyment. Maybe it's not the reaction expected but it means it awakened an emotion on me: charm. That's something lots of professionally made art (those gorgeous digital paintings with the light on point, those intrincate models of realistic weapons, those films that rack up a million billion bucks on theatres all over the globe) doesn't achieve. Because it doesn't ring with me. But "bad art" did. Even if it's the funny bone. Laughing is human. Art is, above everything, human.
tried to draw something else
turned into another excalibur drawing lol
Matt Damon explains why they don’t make movies like they used to. Pls watch.
This is actually a really good perspective and explains why the MCU is the way it is. It is essentially one-off entertainment without the backup of DVD sales (of course Disney being Disney it is still backed up by massive merchandise and spin off sales). The movie is designed to be “disposable”. The rewatch value is low because it’s not intended to be sold on DVD for people to treasure and rewatch every year at Christmas (or whenever) with family. The idea is to generate hype, through manufacturing controversy or teases or gossip. Keeping spoilers under wrap is integral because the rewatch value is negligible. It hinges on surprise or shock (or wtf value) to entice audiences to give up their money to see it in theatres. It is about spectacle, about being loud and colourful and busy, so that for the first 30 minutes after you walk out your senses are still buzzing and you feel like that was worth your $30 or however much. It takes a while for your brain to come back online after the sensory overload to then try to pick apart the plot, and by that stage it doesn’t matter, you’ve already hyped it up to your friends.
And the story or characterisation doesn’t matter because no one is watching that again to care.
(x)
I forgot I have to be active here so here’s my Twitter tutorial on how to draw folds I made a while back to help a friend!
it’s dunsparce!
a little janky, but beloved nonetheless
some guy of all time
They forced my man to work two positions
larry is the author insert of some poor soul at game freak
there is a house in new orleans | carrie (1976); halloween (1973); haunted womanhood by heather harvilesky; house of 1,000 corpses (2003); a nightmare on elm street (1984); the fall river axe murders by angela carter; psycho (1960); the texas chain saw massacre (1974) bts cast shot; ghostland: an american history of haunted places by colin dickey; we must call a meeting by joy harjo
Throw it all away
oh wow it’s an honor to know that tumblr is apparently playing a site-wide game of my very first ttrpg, post-popcorn
no offense @ ppl who are always so easily suggesting “cutting” ppl out your lives like I appreciate the intention I appreciate the thought but in what world are you living that blatantly cutting off communication w/ somebody you regularly see or associate w/ has no consequence or complications like in what world
Cutting people out is a last resort reserved for people who won’t respect your boundaries even after you create emotional distance. Abusive exes who won’t stop touching you, calling you or begging you to get back together etc. Friends who won’t stop insulting you after you’ve asked. Family that degrade you.
Some of yall are labeling any personal conflict as toxic and cutting people out as your first tactic of conflict resolution. That shit ain’t healthy it just enables you to feed your fear of conflict instead of actually learning to deal with having hard conversations.
The Goncharov meme is such a fun little spotlight on how people view media. Like, fake academic analysis about a movie that doesn't exist. Cool. But that's only the first level.
Next you have posts recreating a modern tumblr audience "discovering" an older piece of media and engaging with it through the lens of fan culture. Particularly tumblr-specific fan culture. Particularly in a way that feels like it got its blueprint from Dracula Daily. (Shitposts and memes, intense love for the most prominent female character, reads of complex romantic dynamics between characters, etc.)
Then you get fake discourse about the fake fan response to a fake movie that are quietly complaining about real ways real people respond to real media. I.e., America-centric readings, shallow, shipping-based readings, fans lionizing a protagonist not meant to be admired, etc.
(My personal favorite are posts that recreate the experience of being told a piece of media is so gay, you guys, only to watch it and find it isn't even remotely, that fans who wanted queer subtext wrung blood from a stone and thoroughly misled you.)
I also like the extra-meta ones about "this obscure movie being recently re-discovered," fake film history about copyright battles or the original cut being suppressed, etc. And of course, Johnny fucking Truant is here to give his editorial take on it, as he should be.
Pale Fire, House of Leaves, Goncharov. Humanity is such that every now and then we need to get really invested in fake arguments about a piece of media that doesn't exist.
item: Goncharov on VHS
i would be such a shit dj I just know i’d keep throwing the tom and jerry scream in my mixes
this is just what YTPMVs are
help i'm obsessed
Local object-head fan catches the ‘rona, gets terminal brainrot for a German whistle, overdoes the cool factor to the point it looks like a gangsta Spongebob edit and outcringes herself.
Watch him sing and follow me on Neocities nerds.