fighting the urge every day in this fanbase to defend the "kill eito" routes being bad and punitive to the player but god. every time i see it framed as "wow the game's mean to you for choosing self defense" or "this is like the baby hitler dilemma" i swear to god
like. imo the game's right. killing eito is always a bad idea
it's a bad idea on a practical level. to everyone else in the group, eito was a nice if a lil awkward guy. even if takumi tells them he was evil, emotionally, they're never going to believe it. not to mention that "in the future that only i see, he betrayed us" sounds like a really bad excuse, not to mention being a motive that's completley unverifiable by anyone other than takumi. and to the others, what's stopping takumi from killing one of them with a similar, completely unverifiable excuse? every single time you kill eito, you destroy group trust. and depending on the route, you scrape it back through blackmail, have to get it back the hard way but lose more than half the group, or only get it back because something else becomes a bigger problem.
it's a bad idea on a symbolic level! we have the great opportunity to go back in time and change things for the better. by killing eito, we're making the judgment call that actually, only some things can change. some things are set in stone. by doing that, we give up on the ability to make the future better...and so it isn't. at best it's hard-won but hopeful, at medium it's pointless, and at worst it's a far worse ending than the one in route zero.
most of all though imo. this is a game in no small part about war being hell. the reason we kill eito is because we believe there's no way to handle him/prevent him from causing problems without killing him. even though we're wrong. it's trying to just "solve" the problem of eito aotsuki through removing him from the narrative, much like how sirei is trying to just solve the problem of the invaders by killing them. dont worry about how we got here, don't worry about what they're saying, just do as a soldier does and remove the threat.
in that sense, i think it's poetic justice that it never works out that easily. that complicated issues can't just be neatly solved with violence. killing eito doesn't remove him from the narrative. there is no easy solution to eito aotsuki! but that's justified. he's the voice of dissent, the voice of the truth. it's exactly what sirei - and takumi - deserve to not be able to snuff that out without serious consequences.




















