Graduated Learner Licenses by Lucy Kessler
My mother was delighted with the article on BBC News about RAC suggesting restrictions to learner drivers. So I felt that, as a relatively new driver (I passed in 2010), I should read the proposed changes, and give my view, as someone who was almost affected.
The proposals would put a stop to quite a few things that I’ve done as a young driver. In essence, they want to introduce a graduated license for learner drivers, with three tiers:
1) A minimum one-year period before one can pass their test (I passed quicker than that)
2) Another prohibitionary year, with restrictions on passengers (including no-one under 16 without another driver in the car), and times you can drive. (I’ve driven with children, and late at night)
3) A further two year period, where if the driver gets more than 6 points on their license, they forfeit it.
Currently, drivers do have the two-year period where they cannot exceed 6 points, but the other two steps are new. The RAC have based this system off graduated licenses in the USA, Canada, New Zealand and Australia, and say that statistics show that in those countries, the number of young drivers dying in car crashes has reduced by 60%. They also want learner drivers to experience driving in all conditions, including night and winter, and the one-year minimum learning period is meant to ensure they can achieve that. It all sounds like a very sensible idea – my mother certainly approves! I think my driving when I had just passed still haunts her nightmares…
But, this isn’t the first time the RAC have tried to introduce a graduated license. In 2012, the government decided not to accept the changes, and instead simply improved the Pass Plus, which is an optional additional test that young drivers take after they’ve passed, which means they drive on the motorway and on country lanes with a driving instructor, as well as being taught slightly more thoroughly about bad-weather driving. Paul O’Sullivan, the head of road user licensing for the Department of Transport at that time, said that they felt that the suggestions limited driving too much, because young drivers may need to drive at night, or with young relations. And I honestly think he has a point – certainly, one of the main reasons I learnt to drive was so that I could drive at night, and I could stay out beyond the times the Tube runs. And once I drove a car full of children/young teens because of an emergency that meant their mother couldn’t pick them up from the drama school I was helping at. While another mother would probably have agreed to help out, they all had their own children as well, and I was one of the best people to do it. Under the new driving suggestions, I wouldn’t have been able to help out.
Also, there are concerns as to whether the police would be able to enforce the rules, especially considering they’re already stretched thin. A different way would be for the government to promote telematics insurance, which often comes with the curfew suggestion, though of course that would not be compulsory. And I imagine that the people who do not take the insurance are probably the ones who need to the most! The one year minimum period strikes me as the best idea. It’s easy to enforce, since the DVLA have records of when provisional licenses are issued, and I think it would help learners experience more situations, and gain more confidence. And it would also stop any competition as to who will pass their test quickest, since everyone has to wait a year anyway. So that’s my opinion – what’s yours?








