Perfect Match äșçŠäžŽéš (2025) Dir. Yang Huan
đȘŒ

JVL

â
AnasAbdin
Game of Thrones Daily

ç„æ„ / Permanent Vacation
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
wallacepolsom
Not today Justin
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

titsay

if i look back, i am lost

Janaina Medeiros

Discoholic đȘ©
art blog(derogatory)
Three Goblin Art
taylor price

Origami Around

ellievsbear
Cosimo Galluzzi
seen from Malaysia

seen from Yemen

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from France
seen from United States

seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Thailand

seen from United States

seen from Mexico
@mythographers
Perfect Match äșçŠäžŽéš (2025) Dir. Yang Huan
I love Dunk and Egg so much and have been lamenting for years the fact that it got so little discussion in the Fandom despite having rich characters, beautiful monologues, and dynamic scenes. The absolute stranglehold the F&B Targs have had on all discourse for years, with nothing else left to say.
Iâve even joked before that you can tell a fake ASOIAF fan because they never threaten to give someone a clout in the ear - I have been so excited for the show to come out and give us Ser Duncan the Tall, a true Knight, a real hero, and our sweet little Egg, the bright eyed romantic youth who would grow into a fascinating king.
Now discussion about Dunk & Egg is everywhere and it feels like a real monkeyâs paw moment because 80% of the conversation is centered again on yet another evil Targ, and this one isnât even complicated! He has no depth or redeeming factors - he has three scenes
A one where heâs a jerk to the kindhearted hero, one where he coldly breaks the fingers of a brown woman while burning her livelihood to the ground and calling her a whore, and then one where he loses to the eponymous protagonist .
There is no depth to be plumbed there - what we learn about him additionally is that heâs a cowardly child molester- he is the personification of the cold indifference of the ruling elite to the fates of the poor, the proletariat, women and children. He serves no purpose but to disgust and to be vanquished.
But we donât wish to see him that way - we love this pathetic loser of a monster who yearns to cut childrenâs penises to feel a thrill. We wonder what his future adventures will be, how soon will he be back so we can see whatâs become of him, he has us in a stranglehold but not one of revulsion or fear but of admiration. We are forgiving him, craving to protect him. Meanwhile, Tanselle and Dunk for sale, never worn.
We are experiencing a story where the author takes great pains to point out, with the title hero looking at the camera, that anyone who sides with or supports Aerion and his acts is corrupt. His defenders are emblematic of the rot consuming a empire. To be on his side is to court injustice and deny solidarity to victims.
We have seen this message, and we have happily chosen that side. We are on the sidelines ignoring the call to action to support what is right, we are swearing our swords to evil.
And we had a choice. We didnât take it.
oh cutie PATOOTIE !!!! and the little egg-shaped helmet. â€ïž
Post dmc5 where vergil would rather take his insatiable twin on a lovely bonding trip than paying for child support
nero's honest reaction: đ
(on a more serious note I need to see them TALK. PLEASE CAPCOM
devil may babysit
every year, my devil may cry brainrot re-emerges. hereâs some stuff i drew back in like 2022
Fringe "Novation"
agnes is finally bonding with her son. they're sharing hobbies: complaining, sitting weird on fainting couches, licking wounds to their vanity... nothing like the bond between a girlboss born too soon and her only gay failson.
FRINGE || âJacksonvilleâ 2.15
ANNA TORV as Olivia âAltliviaâ Dunham âłÂ FRINGE ⊠(2008-2013)
Misogyny disguised as an appeal to canonicity
I've seen many excuses in my life for excluding women from narratives. The latest? "Canonicity". This is how some fans â in their eagerness to appear cultured, demanding, or simply "protectors of the work" â hide a latent and ancient misogyny, painted in the colours of textual purism. The Rings of Power series, which dared to make Galadriel a warrior, complex, fierce and, above all, a protagonist, has become the target of the revisionist movement that calls for fidelity to the books only when it comes to men.
It's symptomatic. When we talk about bringing Celeborn into the series, we're talking about "fixing" Galadriel, it's not about deepening a relationship or enriching the world. It's about control. This cursed verb appears in whispers and between the lines of posts and videos: "Galadriel needs to be controlled", "she needs balance", "Celeborn will bring sobriety". And when they talk about balance, what they mean is: she needs to be pruned. Because an angry woman, wounded by pain, brave enough to defy Sauron himself, seems to bother more than the Dark Lord himself.
These criticisms are not innocent. They are symptomatic of a culture that only tolerates women when they are silent, when they are supporting actors, when they love and die for men â never for themselves. And that, for me, is at the heart of this disguised misogyny.
You want "canonicity" so much, but you forget the women who are part of the canon and are solemnly ignored.
Let's talk about InzilbĂȘth. She is the mother of PharazĂŽn, the man who defines the last and most tragic days of NĂșmenor. But she's not just any mother. She is a descendant of the Faithful â of those who resist corruption. In a world where PharazĂŽn represents the pride and arrogance of the NĂșmenorians, InzilbĂȘth could be a character of dramatic depth: a mother torn between love for her son and horror at the path he is following. She could be the voice of the past, of the ancient faith, of the warning against worshipping the Valar and Sauron himself. But she isn't even mentioned in the debates.
Erendis, Tar-Aldarion's wife, is another powerful figure who lies forgotten in the corners of the Unfinished Tales. She is an abandoned woman, scorned by a man whose nautical ambition speaks louder than any affection. Her story is a cruel mirror of what happens to many women in the stories of men: they are loved while they serve their plot, discarded when they claim their own space. And even though Erendis' timeline predates the events of The Rings of Power, she could be mentioned â as a symbol of the price NĂșmenor has already exacted from its women. A legend told in the courts. A warning whispered on the island's street corners.
And if they really want to keep their feet in the "canon", why don't they talk about LĂșthien? The woman who faced Morgoth himself. Who, together with Huan, the dog of Valinor, defeated Sauron. It's not fanfic: it's in the Silmarillion. But female figures are only remembered in fanart or in niche discussions, never clamoured for with the same force as Gil-Galad, Elendil, Isildur, Glorfindel, AnĂĄrion, Celebrimbor or even Celeborn. The logic is simple: when the past is male, it's glory. When it's female, it's forgotten myth.
And I'm not saying that the series is immune to criticism. It's far from it. It has problems with pace, the construction of certain arcs, and dialogue that sometimes sounds forced. But it's curious â or rather, revealing â that the most virulent criticism is directed at Galadriel. Not at Sauron, with his still nebulous motivations. Not the aesthetic choice of NĂșmenor or the lack of exploration of certain cultures. Galadriel has become the scapegoat for a wounded masculinity.
The misogyny that hangs over these reviews is not just about what they say, but about what they choose not to say. I never see posts calling for more women in the series. Tolkien's world has incredible and fascinating women. They exist, they have always existed. The problem is that many of you never look at them with the same fervour as you do the warriors.
So, enough. No more pretending that this is about being faithful to the books. If it were, many of you would be asking for InzilbĂȘth, Erendis, LĂșthien, Aredhel, Nienor, BerĂșthiel, Nimloth, Idril Celebrindal, Andreth, Thuringwethil. But no. You're asking Celeborn to silence Galadriel. You're asking for silence disguised as tradition. And that, my dear, is not Tolkien. That's misogyny.
It's not wrong to want to be faithful to the original material. But it's cowardly to use this as an excuse to erase female voices that were already there â in tales, appendices, half-forgotten stories. The series has a chance to do what many books, series and films have failed to do: give space to women as agents of their own history, and not just as a silent chorus for the tragedies of men.
I want female characters. May they come, with armour or without. With wisdom, pain, fury, tenderness or glory. But let them come.
I want to see LĂșthien. I want to see InzilbĂȘth. I want to see BerĂșthiel. I want to see the women that Tolkien wrote about and that fandom insists on forgetting and erasing. Because, honestly, there's nothing more "canonical" than the pain, strength and light of these women.
It's time to put aside this lazy and selective reading of Tolkien. Middle-earth is too vast a world to fit only the mould of heroes in armour and beards. It has also been shaped by women â wise, brave, charming and tragic. They have names. They have a voice. They have history. And they deserve to be told and seen.
If The Rings of Power really wants to honour Middle-earth, it shouldn't bend the knee to misogynistic clamour disguised as purism. It should dig deeper, listen to the echoes of those women who are repeatedly forgotten â and let them shine through at last. Because fidelity to Tolkien's work doesn't lie in preserving the fragile masculinity of the fans. It's in recognising the complexity of what Tolkien built â including, above all, the female characters that many insist on ignoring.
And if that bothers you, perhaps the problem was never with the series.
@spatortlove @ffaleruv
Fill for my T4 Merlin Bingo square:
Good Morgana
Song: Spoiling Me by Abby Powledge Credit for the scene packs: wolvisapacks
Possible unpopular opinion: treating having a special interest as equivalent to being an expert on the topic is another form of the savant stereotype.
For example: I am writing a dissertation on my special interest. Before that, I read everything there was publicly available to read about it.
Since doing professional research with academic training, I've realized that what I thought I knew was dependent on biased, outdated, and generally wrong historiography. Those books I read are incorrect in multiple ways, and I didn't know how badly until I was doing the research myself.
The point is: having a special interest may (and doesn't have to) make you read everything there is about something. But that might lead you to read old things or outdated things or things that are debated without necessarily having the ability to parse what is and isn't good information because you're just glad that it's about Your Thing. It does not make you an expert or even necessarily a discerning reader because the good feelings while reading a Wiki or an old book can make you less critical.
And it's ok that it doesn't! Sometimes the point is to make yourself happy, not to make yourself the most correct person in the room on a given topic.
I am the last person to insist that you need a university degree to be taken seriously, but the whole point of university degree is to teach you how to research and digest information and how to identify reliable information. It's much harder to acquire these skills without guidance! There's nothing at all wrong with not pursuing a degree in a subject you care a lot about for any reason, but it's very important to be aware of your limitations, some of which will unfortunately be structural because science accessibility is a disaster.
The Studio (2025 - ) I 1.08 - The Golden Globes
bbc merlin is a fun silly show that begs the question what if you were given a destiny you didnât understand and you betrayed yourself time and time again in what you think is a selfless act of love that will serve a greater purpose, only for that to be the exact reason you fail and the undoing of the person you love most. and then the random filler episodes are like this witch is doing terrorism in camelot by sneaking magic mushroom bombs into the soup and merlin has to gaslight arthur into thinking he doesnât like mushrooms or something idk
Realll
Like oh Morganaâs back and sheâs got a plot to kill the king who drove her away by refusing to stop massacring the group sheâs realised sheâs a part of!!
But before we get to that, hereâs the two-episode-long story of how the king fucked a troll, featuring the absolute hilarity that is Gaius and Leon trying to respectfully convince Uther that his wife has tusks and the funniest cinematic choice in history to cut straight to the dragon WHEEZING with laughter while an annoyed Merlin tries to get him to say how to break the enchantment