The really scary result of this election is that the right-populist, open nationalist, and in the recent time more and more racist-leaning AfD is the  S E C O N D  S T R O N G E S T party in east Germany.
lollll âopen nationalistâ as if thats a bad thing????
why are germans so whipped lmao
Thankfully the East Germans are waking up
OP, please explain why nationalism is bad
Exclusive nationalism as represented by the AfD aims at aggressive differentiation from other nations. The idealization of the own nation with the aim of a unity between people and territory is often accompanied with exclusion and discrimination, in extreme cases with forced displacement or extermination of minorities that are perceived as foreign or detrimental to the own national corpus. Examples apart from German National Socialism are the Italian Fascism and the ethnic cleansing during the Yugoslav Wars in the 1990s. Exclusive nationalism claims a monopoly of loyality and interpretation. The individual must no longer regard its religion, home, or political opinion as identity-establishing focus of its thinking and acting, but only the nation. This can lead to the relativization or even depreciation of the individual, culminating in the sentence âYou are nothing, your nation is everything.â Exclusive nationalism often culminates in chauvinism and hate against other nations leading to war. These days with mankind having weapons capable of annihilating human life (or even life on earth in general), wars are more dangerous than ever.
Thatâs why the nationalism represented by the AfD is a dangerous thing.
So basically itâs bad because pride in your heritage scares you. Got it.
Got it not entirely.
Itâs a difference to invite others to share your pride in the heritage (as I try to do with this blog) or to reject others because they donât have that heritage. It is the latter that is part of the dangerous exclusive nationalism that I am warning against, while I would appreciate the former as healthy patriotism. There may be a thin line between them.
Itâs not necessarily bad to âexcludeâ people from being part of your national heritage. I wouldnât want a British person saying theyâre glad they helped us go to the moon when they didnât.
Obviously, that British person would be talking bullshit, so thereâs no point in excluding him, he is already out. But with the live TV coverage of the moon landing provided to the rest of the world for free, the USA has invited the rest of the world to take part in their national pride, for good reason.
BTW, I take a certain pride in the fact that the brilliant head who helped the USA to the moon was a German. At the same time, my pride is quite a bit restrained because thousands of forced workers died during the development of the basic technology of the moon rocket during world war II. I have visited both the site of the development and of mass-production of the A4/V2 rocket and was awestruck by the brilliance of mind and disgusted by the disregard of the lives of fellow human beings. Which, according to nationalist ideology, were NOT fellow, but inferior.
That said, it is now midnight in Germany. I am going to sleep now. Letâs continue the discussion tomorrow. Good night.
Tl;dr --
Patriotism doesn't mean blind nationalism.
















