HERES MY MAIN LINEUP FOR THIS YEAR YAY
An art trading game

shark vs the universe

oozey mess

No title available
Keni
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
Three Goblin Art
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
tumblr dot com
Sade Olutola
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
we're not kids anymore.
Cosmic Funnies
Monterey Bay Aquarium

Kaledo Art
wallacepolsom

blake kathryn
official daine visual archive
cherry valley forever
Mike Driver

⁂

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Chile
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
@nanabready
HERES MY MAIN LINEUP FOR THIS YEAR YAY
An art trading game
Fused my gfs 2 sonas together in an awesome gamer nerd cutie
And yes. She listens to Hail the sun!
Oh my god. I need to share another story of my new friend making today. So my friends husband says, very casually, as we’re about to leave for the ren faire, “Yeah, it’s like my story about fucking a chicken.”
And of the four people present I was the only one who was shocked. The others all nodded as if to say, yes yes, we know, the chicken fucking.
So he explained, when a progressive person is analyzing a behavior they will typically use the metric, Harm/No Harm. They may not like things in the No Harm category but they wouldn’t object.
Conversely, a more conservative mindset used something like eight metrics. Authority/No Authority Moral/Not Moral, things like that.
So, he posited if you want to sound out someone’s mindset (and you’re willing to live with the repercussions) you can ask: if a man buys a dead chicken from the store, cleans it thoroughly, then fucks it, and then eats it himself…?
I listened in dawning horror, both rapt and disgusted. But into the growing pause I whispered, “No harm…” because it really has no effect on me or anyone else if a man fucks a dead chicken. I don’t like it, I think he’s a weird dude, but like. That’s his dick. But a more conservative person will hear that and object on moral grounds despite not being harmed.
It’s been haunting me all day, so please enjoy.
This is also a handy probability scale for who's gonna be wearing your skin in a week.
I know you’re joking but this joke is absolutely the point. You’ve assigned a moral judgement to the act, rather than acknowledging it as not harmful.
In the current climate sex has so many moral judgements applied, and I can tell you that perfectly bland every day people do some Crazy Sex Stuff. When I worked at a sex shop they’d tell me all about it. It didn’t preclude them to murder or being serial killers. If someone wants to fuck a warm cantaloupe or a dead chicken it doesn’t matter. It doesn’t harm me or anyone else.
Your morals should not be applied to anyone else’s sex life unless there’s actual harm, and a time where public indecency laws are rearing their heads again creeping toward the immoral queers, it’s something to actively push against.
To read more about the serious research underlying this, look up Moral Foundations (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_foundations_theory). The original hypothesis has five or six axes, along which different people make different value judgments:
Care/Harm
Fairness/Cheating
Loyalty/Betrayal
Authority/Subversion
Sanctity/Degradation
Liberty/Oppression
One of the features of conservative populism is that it leans heavily on Sanctity/Degradation for its emotional hook. You can see this in their revulsion at queer sex acts, for example, but it's also a feature of propaganda that casts some races/ethnicities as "dirty" or "filthy" or "animals". Mis-casting these feelings of revulsion as something they should have the Liberty to put into law - rather than something which writing laws about would constitute Oppression of others - is a key feature of modern conservative/traditional movements.
Dr. Jer Clifton has done similar work on a 26-dimensional measurement of attitudes that he calls "Primal World Beliefs" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primal_world_beliefs). In one sense these theories are both really reductive... but in another they're incredibly useful for understanding what makes an argument so compelling to others when it sounds preposterous to you.
One more reason you should care: the people who build the structure of political campaigns absolutely have read these theories, and use them to structure their broad arguments.
This post got way more scholarly than I expected for starting with hypothetical chicken-fucking.
This is Donnie :3 (not pictured is the carabiner she wears)
Rotating her in my head
Artfight is almost over and i forgot to post any of the art i did this year….
Character belong to their respective owners!
Now to finish up the revenges ive got queued up
What if we were both girl chimeras and we smooched 🏳️🌈 😳(closeup under the cut)
Also full disclosure i drew this on a whim after seeing @arainydancer signalis animation…. Please check it out omg its so good
What if we were both girl chimeras and we smooched 🏳️🌈 😳(closeup under the cut)
gotta draw my girl
Concept for an armored and/or captured zeph
Stuff for my artfight
Its that time of the year in which i draw lesbians (so all year)
Insert corny 80s thriller dialogue
Digital hog
Sulien developments
Sa2 Nana You Smoke Too Tough. Your Swag Too Different. Your Bitch Is Too Bad. They’ll Kill You
Sa2 Nana:
More sona stuff bc why not