
Janaina Medeiros
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
cherry valley forever

ellievsbear

tannertan36
almost home
will byers stan first human second
šŖ¼

ā
macklin celebrini has autism
Jules of Nature

shark vs the universe

No title available

Kaledo Art
occasionally subtle
Mike Driver
Stranger Things
todays bird
Game of Thrones Daily

Love Begins
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from Türkiye
seen from Indonesia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Australia

seen from United States
seen from Finland

seen from Australia

seen from United States

seen from Cyprus
seen from Germany
seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia
seen from T1
@tartrazeen
Hey - sorry, super weird question for Deltarune but...
... why did everyone seem to move on from the rape allegory in Chapter 4's Weird Route?
When it first came out, the scene ended with the Deflowering wilted rose imagery. Yes, that got switched to a big pane of broken glass but - like.
The core concept was still that Kris stuck Noelle with a thorn, which put a little human soul in her, and that little soul gets bigger by the end of the chapter. š¤
And there have been clues since Chapter 2 about Kris and Noelle being 'married' and needing marriage shoes, but now with Chapter 5, Noelle just straight-up says she thought her and Kris were supposed to be a thing.
I just don't see it discussed in video essays or posts at all.
As far as I can tell the rape allegory seems to be unintended. The
wilting rose, at least to me, was supposed to symbolize Noelle's loss of innocence in the regard of her being a video game character, like the chapter 1 and 2 secret bosses, which is then built on in chapter 5 with her wanting to break out of bounds and cross the lake leading to an early chapter 7. I think the "soul growing" imagery is supposed to show how Noelle is losing her mind via being subsumed by the player soul, not unlike a lovecraftain horror story. I do agree that there is a weird romance happening with the two of them, though I don't really know why as the weird route seems to have mostly dropped the whole forcing traditional rpg norms thing. (at least to me)
Yay, someone actually answered! :D Thank you!!
Agreed with it being unintentional. To me, it's fine if it's unintended, since it doesn't change that the allegory is there. Lots of unintentional stuff ends up conveying a major theme regardless of what the creator thought - sometimes even because the creator didn't realize that's what they'd put in. That's what this feels like!
But this one is particularly interesting, because in Toby's attempt to "remove" the rape allegory, he ended up pointing to its existence more than ever. I can understand the rose being tied to Noelle's innocence in isolation. Maybe changing that to glass breaking, like a panel of the prophecy breaking, works as a direct substitute for her path in life being forced into a new route.
But with the combination of the rose, the marriage shoes, Noelle talking about expecting to be a thing with Kris, Suzie saying she thought Kris and Noelle were a thing, and a scene that pretty much everyone picked up on as 'forcing' Noelle to do something, and that scene resulting in Noelle having another soul put into her and growing...
... removing just the rose image doesn't do away with the full idea. And to try to nudge it into "oh no, it means Noelle's being taken over" - that's a fair and fine new direction in isolation, but it's continuing on in combination with the broader imagery that looks like Noelle was forced to carry a metaphorical baby.
By that, I mean look at Noelle's behaviour in the Chapter 5 Weird Route. She's erratic now. She's spiralling over who she is and what she can do. I could see Toby intending that to mean, "She's losing her grip on reality." But combined with those other points, it just as easily lends itself to, "Yeah, if I was a pregnant teenager, I'd be freaking out from my hormones too. My mom would definitely disown me, so I'd want to run away as well."
I don't know why it dropped the traditional RPG roles concept (which is fine; stories evolved) either, just to double down on the "Kris and Suzie are expected to be together" concept in Chapter 5. That brings it to a point where, even if Toby had the pane of glass break in Chapter 4 the whole time, it wouldn't detract from the greater context it all fits into. :/
It might be too harsh to focus on the part about rape itself, because that buries the lede on what it's getting at. It's more like, "Is the implied thing happening with Kris and Noelle some metaphorical teen pregnancy plot?" But to get to that question, it's like, "Well, how would she have metaphorically gotten pregnant?" And it's because Kris forced her to equip the Thorn Ring. I'm happy to interpret that action as something else, but I don't know what should it be interpreted as instead. 'Loss of innocence' isn't the full answer when it's in combination with the other points. š¤
... Maybe it's like an arranged marriage, or something...? The thorn ring is can just be taken as a wedding band, and the thorns and forcefulness are about Noelle being locked into her path? That's why she starts referring to herself as a "Noelle who can only do Noelle" things? So forcing the ring on her is forcing her into that marriage, and having the soul in her is like, "Well, you need to have your nuclear family now, don't you?"
I mean, I'd still have personal concerns with vilifying arranged marriage. But I want to figure out what's being vilified or implied first. š¤
Even the idea of Noelle saying, "Kris and I couldn't decide who to vote as king and queen when we were kids," brings an idea of taking over the Dark World somehow. There's a king and a queen (and the game hints at having two queens š„°), but more importantly, there's a prince, so having any sort of "royal child" could fit into that somehow. Idk. Like Kris is being used to force Noelle into ruling with them and having an heir. š¤
THIS GUY IS A GENIUS, BUT ALSO OMFGGGG
If the stupid scene with Sans changing his store sign over and over, including one that meant it "wasn't closed but nobody was inside", was ACTUALLY MEANT TO HINT AT THE ABORTED WEIRD ROUTE
š¤Æš¤Æš¤Æš¤Æš¤Æ
I'm gonna lose my mind
also the comments said people are trying to push to call it "abnormal" or "rejected" route, which I assume is because calling it "aborted" makes some folks uncomfortable. But in that case, just call it the "Failed Route," since that's how you get to it. 'Abnormal' is going to be too easy to confuse with 'weird,' and you don't get to it by being 'rejected'.
... Or we could just keep calling it 'aborted,' because that's the term used for a mission having to being called off. It's not just about the medical procedure.
complimented a cashier on her turtle pin this morning and she said "oh thanks, I am a little bit of a Turtle Person" with the carefully contained energy of Cookie Monster telling you he's mildly fond of chocolate chips
I hope she and the multiple tons of turtle merch she definitely has at home are having a wonderful day
i love this metaphor so much i drew it
Hey - sorry, super weird question for Deltarune but...
... why did everyone seem to move on from the rape allegory in Chapter 4's Weird Route?
When it first came out, the scene ended with the Deflowering wilted rose imagery. Yes, that got switched to a big pane of broken glass but - like.
The core concept was still that Kris stuck Noelle with a thorn, which put a little human soul in her, and that little soul gets bigger by the end of the chapter. š¤
And there have been clues since Chapter 2 about Kris and Noelle being 'married' and needing marriage shoes, but now with Chapter 5, Noelle just straight-up says she thought her and Kris were supposed to be a thing.
I just don't see it discussed in video essays or posts at all.
Iāve rewritten this ask a bazillion times, but itās something thatās been weighing on me, especially with all the many fandom dramas going on. Iām just afraid Iāll sound ignorant, or that Iām asking permission to watch racist shit, but I am genuinely trying to be as supportive as possible.
What is the best course of action when a creator or game or show or book says something or does something racist? Or has some characters or themes that are suspect? There are times when the answer is super clear, when creators are past the point of forgiveness. But what about single racist acts? When should apologies be taken seriously? What should I do if people are split online about the decision? What is the best way to get as many available opinions as I can? When is it time to press eject on the entire series? How can I best support Black people still within the fandom?
I promise Iām not asking you to hold my hand or to give me permission, I just want a basis. A general guide. Sometimes I feel frozen, because I donāt know what the best course of action is.
Well let me ask you some questions in response that might help put your panic in context:
1) why is "a single racist act" more acceptable? Why is the amount of times one has been antiblack racist the standard, and not also the impact, as well as the perpetrator's response to that single act?
2) what is YOUR standard for "too far"? That is, what is YOUR line for allowing antiblackness to slide until it is "too bad"?
3) Are you okay that the victims of said antiblackness who have a different standard of "too far" will judge you accordingly?
4) Here's what Black fans consider to be a good apology. How often have you accepted less than? Are you okay with continuing to do that for the sake of entertainment?
5) What makes you think YOU- if you are not a target of that racism- have the right to make that call of what's an "acceptable" apology?
6) Do you have Black friends within fandom? Do you listen to their opinions when they tell you what they need? Why do you hold anyone else's opinion as valuable when they are not the target group in question?
"Morning doctor." (source)
Jamaica mention š„³šÆš²šŗ
i think we need copyright reform. currently most works are protected by copyright for the life of the author plus 70 years. here are my two proposals.
18 years. this is enough time for the work to grow to adulthood and begin to care for itself
life of the author + zero years. i like this one because it encourages you to kill people
3. Life of the ORIGINAL author or 18 years, whichever is longer
That way people can't sell the rights and can keep extending it as a loophole, and so if the author dies early, their families can still benefit for 18 years after
There is a case to be made that this still encourages you to kill people, which I'm all for
sipping on this pretending im a carp in a murky river swimming around sucking up clutches of gelatinous frog eggs
we'll do it together, right?
Most of us have a gross food at a friendās house while growing up story but mine was sooooo wild. We sat down to dinner, the side dishes were like white rice and broccoli and the main entree was shrimp. Just shrimp. Unseasoned steamed shrimp. Pink. Not a shred of any sort of herb or flavoring on that thang. I do not enjoy shrimp on the best of days but I can tolerate it, I bit into one just to make sure there wasnāt like a clear lemon sauce or something that wasnāt visible but no, this was really and truly completely unseasoned shrimp. This was a predicament. I was in maybe the third grade, I really wanted to make a good impression so I politely asked if there was any cocktail sauce to dip the shrimp in as that was what I was used to doing. Her dad laughed and said no.
I straight up could not make myself eat it. I tried very politely to nibble on the side dishes and I did not place additional shrimp on my plate as to be polite and not waste food but it was fucking surreal. The whole unseasoned meal combination was not human food, it was like a fancy meal for an expensive dog. Her, her parents and her brother are eating it like unseasoned rice, broccoli and shrimp is a completely normal meal. I feel it is important to note that this was occurring in North Carolina so Iām not used to dealing with this, I had never experienced an unseasoned shrimp with no sauce in my 9 or 10 years of life. I also feel it is important to note my friend is biracial, Black mom, white dad. This is not a midwestern Caucasian mom mealtime disaster, this is 100 miles inland from the fucking coast in North Carolina. Shrimp is not a cheap food so itās not like they just couldnāt afford to season the protein. To this day, I still do not understand. Maybe they were health freaks, maybe someone in the household was on a low sodium diet but not a single HERB??? NOTHING????? WHY WERE THEY EATING LIKE THAT???????
My friendās dad mentioned to my dad that I hadnāt eaten at dinner when they walked me home, presumably because he didnāt want my dad to think they had me over for dinner and refused to feed me when I went home starving. My parents taught me to always be polite and gracious and Iād get in trouble for being rude for things I did not completely understand were slights but I knew bonding over food is a big part of the culture in the south so not feeding someone when theyāre at your house and/or not eating when offered is considered rude and bizarre. I waited for them to leave and I was sooooo worried Iād be in trouble but I explained the unseasoned shrimp dilemma to my dad and the look on his face was like š, he was also truly fucking baffled and I was absolved of all guilt.
I am picturing someone going š§ and ending the conversation there to sweep their kid inside. No further questions, your Honour.
This was a personal attack
"Trans people existing does literally nothing negative to your lives you crybaby wimps.
Your life is getting harder and costlier because of the oligarchs, not trans people"
Sticker spotted in Koreatown Los Angeles, CA
I have answered a few asks about TADC because I know how important transfem Jax has been to a lot of people, and I donāt want to take that away from anyone, but I am very critical of the use of the song āIsnāt She Lovely?ā being reclaimed as a coming out scene, when the original song was written by a Black man about the birth of his Black daughter. Keeping in mind the racism from some of the voice actors, and the lukewarm apology from the creator, it is very insidious to me to take a Black-specific song and reclaim it as something else. It very much feels like ātaking Black art without caring about the bodies that made it.ā
Obviously, this has already been pointed out by Black people in the fandom, but I wanted to bring it up because Iāve had a few asks about that song specifically that Iām not comfortable with answering. I am extremely happy that Jax is canonically transfem because even though Iāve never watched the show, Iāve witnessed peopleās excitement about it, and Iām not trying to rain on anyoneās parade, but Iām also not going to pretend like the racism doesnāt exist because thatās not the kind of blog Iām running here. Any other song couldāve been used, and perhaps there wasnāt much thought put into its choice; Iām sure it wasnāt a deliberate act of malice, because from an outsider perspective that song seems to fit perfectly, but that ultimately doesnāt make it any less harmful, especially given the context surrounding the production.
I feel similarly about how United In Grief by Kendrick Lamar became a popular TikTok sound for people to make funny jokes about something going wrong when the original lyrics are specifically about Black grief. Or about the new trend of āthe saxaphones are getting louderā taken from Boyz N The Hood, which is a movie about Black-American experiences that a lot of (white) people using this sound likely havenāt even seen.
Iām not saying itās inherently bad to use these songs in different contexts, but itās a pattern that keeps repeating of Black-specific art being taken by white people without the original context in mind and being used for their own experiences instead. Itās important to at least notice this pattern.