Today's Document
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Sade Olutola
No title available
izzy's playlists!
Noah Kahan
Origami Around
if i look back, i am lost
Stranger Things
pixel skylines
★
The Stonewall Inn
Show & Tell
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Misplaced Lens Cap
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Mike Driver
No title available
oozey mess
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from Russia
seen from Argentina
seen from Malaysia
seen from Australia
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Sweden
seen from United States
seen from United States
@nexomy
some people find their happiness is using less labels, doing less decoration, being less defined. that happiness is very valid. it is just also that another kind of valid happiness is those who find freedom in using labels, including hyper specific labels. the joy you feel as a result of your decoration is just as genuine and just as important, and so are all of the labels that you use to describe yourselves.
For any relocated TikTok users
you can say sex and kill its fine
If you don't have a profile picture people will assume you're a bot
theres barely an algorithm, if you want to see cool shit reblog things instead of just liking them
follower count doesnt matter
tumblr fame gets you one thing and it is Yelled At
no one knows what the fuck the nsfw policy is
block anyone that annoys you even a little bit
And most importantly:
post cringe
Grabbing you guys by the shoulders so tightly as I say you have to reblog things regardless of how old the posts are, this is the show and tell website
^ (prev tags) Yeah this is is important too ! I would also add :
Just generally don't use a tag if your post is not about the fandom/the stuff you're tagging (that will get you reported)
Don't use a fandom/character/ship tag to say how much you hate it or you think people are wrong for shipping it etc
Adding an image description, or sometimes an audio description, is common practice here. You can put it in your reblog (works even if the image is from someone else's reblog) or in the alt text. Example below
Don't use the alt text only to be funny. You can be funny with it as long as what you're doing is only describing the image.
[Image ID: tumblr tag that says “hi hello! also don't talk about how much you hate a character in the notes on a post about that character where the op is being positive”. End ID]
god it’s so sad living in an allocentric world. There are so many relationships that are so complex and nuanced that are all put under the label of ‘romantic’ and immediately all the intrigue is taken from it. Like don’t you realize that these relations are actually ENHANCED by the fact that they are not romantic or sexual?
NOOO DONT PUT THE CHARACTERS IN A ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIP YOURE TAKING OFF THE SEASONING!!!!
"I would do anything for you; I would cross worlds for you; I would kill for you; I would die for you" etc in fictional romance= tired and expected
from a boss to their employee= what the fuck is happening there
Me about Suits btw
True I *do* have things I need to be doing and am avoiding because I am letting my anxiety take over, how did you KNOWWWWW
Polyamory is safe for work. Polyamory is safe for kids. Polyamory is safe for day time tv. Polyamory isn’t more sexual than any other relationship and it can be just as romantic, sweet, and healthy.
Aggressively reblogs.
happy pride month
this one kinda hurts when i see it every pride month. im glad to see an art piece of mine still circulating, and with nearly 100,000 notes too! it just hurts that im separated from it. everyone in the notes thinks im gone. im still here, but my potential community and connection is lost because im forgotten in place of the art. yeah, my deactivated profile does add to the profoundness of what i was saying, but i am still removed.
Drawing request: John being annoyed that Sherlock is only wearing his bathrobe thingy. If you will please 🙏
as you wish ^-^
OH MY GOD YESSSSSS THANK YOUUUU
Some people will say they hate children and then their only recent child-adjacent experiences are Crying Baby In Supermarket and Ragebait Toddler Video and Cousin’s iPad-Addicted Kindergartner and it’s like yeah no shit you don’t like them. It’s like you saw Speed 2: Cruise Control (1997) and concluded that you hate movies.
Genuinely why are kids the only group of people we're just allowed to hate. For no reason. Like kids as a group are not oppressing anyone. Yet you're allowed to say you hate them. Okay. Why. What's up with that.
i love you lab grown diamonds i love you slavery-free chocolate i love you community gardens i love you fact that the insulin patent was sold for $1 i love you locally produced meat and milk i love you streets turned into walkable parks i love you little reminders that Things Do Not Have To Be This Way and there are people working to build a better world!!
i love you smog tests for cars i love you clean air regulations i love you HEPA filters i love you dam removal i love you planting native gardens i love you monarch butterflies (up 64% in 2026!) i love you working for decades to bring the condors back from zero to 300+ in the wild i love you inventing little machines to pick up the plastic fishing nets and other trash in the sea i love you occupational health and safety regulations i love you environmental protection agencies i love you unions i love you social aid programs i love you food not bombs i love you sea shepherds i love you most countries stopping industrial whaling and more humpback whales now than ever before i love you saving the forests i love you little libraries i love you take what you need cupboards/fridges i love you secular food pantries i love you public bathrooms i love you all-ages playgrounds i love you museums i love you aquariums + zoos i love you restoring peregrine falcons to nyc i love you letting beavers fix the river i love you releasing wolves into the wild i love you bison recovery efforts i love you landback i love you reducing light pollution i love you freeway sound baffle walls i love you advertising bans i love you public outreach and education i love you maria montessori i love you queer clinics i love you people working really hard and succeeding at fixing the world and making it safer for all living beings!
alright I've got to do some quick math to explain attitudes towards AI to my boss.
we're looking to create an AI policy, and when we were talking about this, my boss (older millennial) was genuinely shocked to hear that younger people do not (seem) to view AI positively (a la the recent commencement speakers being booed)
please rb for larger sample size!
Question 1/3
What is your age, and do you feel AI is a net positive or net negative in our lives today?
under 18, AI is a net positive
under 18, AI is a net negative
18-29, AI is a net positive
18-29, AI is a net negative
30-45, AI is a net positive
30-45, AI is a net negative
46-60, AI is a net positive
46-60, AI is a net negative
over 60, AI is a net postive
over 60, AI is a net negative
Question 2/3
How often do you visit or interact with museums/archives (whether in person or online)?
Frequently (multiple times per month)
Often (multiple times per year)
Occasionally (a couple times per year)
Rarely (once every couple of years)
Never :(
Question 3/3
If you saw a museum was using AI in exhibits, marketing, research, etc., would you be more or less inclined to visit that museum?
under 18, more inclined
under 18, less inclined
18-29, more inclined
18-29, less inclined
30-45, more inclined
30-45, less inclined
46-60, more inclined
46-60, less inclined
over 60, more inclined
over 60, less inclined
Thank you for helping with this data collection. Please rb for as big a sample as possible!
🫶
Online friend brainrot is waking up at six AM and checking how long it would take to visit your friend (in the USA no less) by bus and finding out it would take 3 days of buses, straight up, and thinking "oh it's not even that bad. I could do that this summer". Like bitch no.
THE BOYS FINALE THOUGHTS
*** SPOILERS***
I think that ultimately Vought still being around is the pessimistic side and bit of "realism" sprinkled into an otherwise fairly happy ending for a majority of the players going into the finale. Like of course the evil megacorp is still around so that this (or something like it) can inevitably happen again down the line and history can repeat itself. The world always learns it's lesson for a time and tried to right wrongs, but we always end up back in the trenches again with a new megalomaniac trying to proclaim themselves God and take over the world...
Like I just feel that the decision for Vought to still be active and Stan Edgar to be back as CEO was very deliberate to show that the cycle WILL continue.
Am I mad about it? Yeah. In the same way I'm mad that irl we can't stop repeating history either! But, despite being mad about it. I can see how it would make sense (at least in a surface-level way). Edgar was ousted... by Homelander and Victoria Neumann. He was "imprisoned" by Homelander (even though he was taken by HL, it was only at the very end after he was already in his bunker). For someone with his money, resources, and power, of course a slimeball like Stan Edgar gets away with it by blaming Homelander for everything. Society never holds those people accountable. He's essentially the Umbridge to Homelander's Voldemort. The every day evil compared to one that's 1 in a million.
Anyway, watching Homelander get killed was satisfying, but I wish the fight lasted longer. I don't pity the man who was a rapist and murderer and was prepared fo commit large scale genocide via literal thought police. I feel bad for the kid he was but not the man he became. That little kid died a long time ago and he hasn't been innocent since then. And I can be happy he died while still being upset that Vought didn't get destroyed. Being happy he died doesn't mean I'm pro-Vought. They are not mutually exclusive, which it seems like lot of HL pity posts kinda make it sound like they are.
I am begging people to understand that reproductive rights is as much the right to become and remain pregnant as it is to terminate a pregnancy.
Encouraging all people capable of being pregnant to get their tubes tied or get a hysterectomy isn’t the solution you think it is.
Most people who get abortions do so because they want to be able to get pregnant in the future.
Back-alley abortions often leave people unable to become pregnant again, even if they want to. Legal, safe abortion ensures that a person can terminate a pregnancy while still retaining the option and ability to become pregnant again.
PoC, disabled people, and trans and intersex people have historically been barred from the right to get pregnant and reproduce. These marginalized groups have faced sterilization and maternal mortality for a long time.
If you think reproductive justice is only about the right to *not* be pregnant, you are woefully misinformed.
Reproductive justice means people should be able to control their own bodies, whether it means ending or preventing a pregnancy, or becoming pregnant and remaining pregnant.
Reproductive justice means that healthcare providers should and must address the barriers and dangers PoC, disabled people, and trans and intersex people face when it comes to obstetrics and gynecology.
Reproductive justice means lowering the maternal mortality rate for black people in America.
Reproductive justice means not sterilizing disabled people and providing safe options for disabled people who want to become pregnant.
Reproductive justice means acknowledging that trans people may want to become pregnant and not mandating they be sterilized in order to legally transition.
Reproductive justice means not sterilizing intersex babies and children in the attempt to make them fit into a dyadic, binary sex.
Reproductive justice is not just about abortions.
something about ryland grace erasing Who Am I? off the whiteboard to replace it with flight plan back to rocky. something about the question of who ryland grace is is no longer important to him, because it doesnt matter who he is if rocky is dead. something about him letting go of his distress over his amnesia and his will to go back home in favour of saving his friend.
To be honest I saw it as the answer to the question. He's Rocky's friend. He's the man that will save Rocky. Something something human sense of self and identity is largely dependent on our relationships and community.
these tags are so funnyyyy
Josh Johnson in Charlotte (posted 4/21/26)
