yeup

No title available
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

Kaledo Art
🪼

pixel skylines
Today's Document

JVL

Discoholic 🪩
$LAYYYTER

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
No title available
styofa doing anything

⁂
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
sheepfilms
Show & Tell
Keni
Acquired Stardust
Sade Olutola

Product Placement
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from Israel
seen from Germany
seen from Italy

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from India

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
@noel-and-void
yeup
horden island archivists
therem harth rem ir estraven you are so dear to me
lunch
Despite All My Rage...
okay heres more rocktiz
alright I've got to do some quick math to explain attitudes towards AI to my boss.
we're looking to create an AI policy, and when we were talking about this, my boss (older millennial) was genuinely shocked to hear that younger people do not (seem) to view AI positively (a la the recent commencement speakers being booed)
please rb for larger sample size!
Question 1/3
What is your age, and do you feel AI is a net positive or net negative in our lives today?
under 18, AI is a net positive
under 18, AI is a net negative
18-29, AI is a net positive
18-29, AI is a net negative
30-45, AI is a net positive
30-45, AI is a net negative
46-60, AI is a net positive
46-60, AI is a net negative
over 60, AI is a net postive
over 60, AI is a net negative
Question 2/3
How often do you visit or interact with museums/archives (whether in person or online)?
Frequently (multiple times per month)
Often (multiple times per year)
Occasionally (a couple times per year)
Rarely (once every couple of years)
Never :(
Question 3/3
If you saw a museum was using AI in exhibits, marketing, research, etc., would you be more or less inclined to visit that museum?
under 18, more inclined
under 18, less inclined
18-29, more inclined
18-29, less inclined
30-45, more inclined
30-45, less inclined
46-60, more inclined
46-60, less inclined
over 60, more inclined
over 60, less inclined
Thank you for helping with this data collection. Please rb for as big a sample as possible!
🫶
I don’t know if this is an obvious take or a hot take, but I think people need to start re-framing feminism as the fight for body autonomy as opposed to whatever this second wave revival gender essentialist bullshit we have going on right now. Once you reframe it in this way, it’s easier to understand intersectionality and why cis women are not the only people who need feminism. The lack of body autonomy effects cis women, trans people, intersex people, disabled people, poc, homeless people, sex workers, etc. and your feminism needs to include and prioritise all of these groups of people (which will include men btw) because feminism is about autonomy, not about establishing a matriarchy. Body autonomy is the biggest threat to the patriarchy, both with reproductive rights, LGBTQ+ rights, and even the right to not be drafted into military services. Once body autonomy is established for everyone, the patriarchy no longer has a leg to stand on.
And body autonomy does include things that you don’t personally like either. I was prompted to write this post after a series of bad takes from progressives, but one of them was re-hashing the Sabrina Carpenter album cover drama with “I don’t think it’s conservative of me to think that the album cover is a bad look when we’ve seen images of women being abused in this way” because I do actually think you’ve failed to understand feminism by projecting your morals onto a woman who was consensually expressing her own autonomy just because she expressed it in a way that you didn’t like or that made you uncomfortable.
Body autonomy also means unhealthy choices. Body autonomy also means regret rates. Body autonomy also means freedom of sexuality. Body autonomy also means mutilation. If you believe body autonomy has limitations and exceptions, then your feminism is most likely surface level.
TERFs are some of the biggest opponents to body autonomy, and if you find yourself thinking “oh people can do whatever they want with their bodies as long as it doesn’t harm them or make others uncomfortable” then you are far more susceptible to TERF propaganda than you think.
ooooh the radfems are BIG mad about this one
A little dialogue-less comic showcasing what Phil had to put up with before they finally just moved in together
AWE THEYRE JUST PHETUSES
I feel that "lawn care" as promoted in the USA can be considered some kind of pseudoscience.
It doesn't have the conspiracy-theory-adjacent qualities of virtually every other "pseudoscience," which makes me hesitant to call it that, but the theory and method of it is still full of totally unsupported junk.
Where do I start?
I'm a gardener and so are the majority of people I spend time around. If you are mowing 3+ times a week and regularly spending money on fertilizer, soil tests, herbicides, fungicides, and insecticides, you have chosen the most expensive, time consuming thing you could possibly do with your yard. Unless you are a farmer as your livelihood, NOTHING else you could grow is that high maintenance. Nothing.
Most turfgrasses are invasive species. I said it.
The practice of "nuking" your lawn (killing everything in it and "starting over")...If you have a so-called "weed problem" this is probably the worst thing you can do.
Listen to me very carefully: "Weed" seeds are everywhere. There is, at all times, a supply of seeds lying dormant in the soil, waiting for the right conditions to sprout. (It's called the "soil seed bank" and you can look it up.) They are capable of "waiting" for years, even decades. Furthermore, most "weed" species spread by wind, meaning you can't physically eliminate them from an outdoor area unless you...surround your entire yard with an incredibly fine mesh netting and never leave, I guess.
Heavy management will make your "weed" problem progressively worse and worse because those plants are specifically adapted to colonize barren areas that recently underwent disastrous events that killed off most life.
Basically all plants are adapted to live in the company of other organisms, and suffer when there are no other plants around. "Weeds" with deep taproots penetrate into and aerate the soil. Clover puts nitrogen in the ground that other plants need. Low ground covers keep the soil moist and stop the sun from baking your grass to a crisp.
The plant "taking over" your lawn is probably not killing your grass. Your grass is dying and it's being replaced by something more suited to the environment. This is supposed to happen.
Monocultures are notoriously susceptible to disease and mass die-offs. "Oh no a big patch of my lawn is dying!" Yeah, that happens when you plant monocultures. You set yourself up for this.
"Why is there a bare patch in my yard/why won't grass grow well here?" Because in nature, each plant has a relatively narrow range of conditions it likes to grow in, so other plants it might otherwise compete with can stick to their preferred conditions and nobody has to compete directly. Win-win. Not all parts of your yard have the exact same amount of sun, moisture, etc. Expecting the plant life to look the same is unrealistic.
Let me make this very clear: It is fully impossible to "solve" the problem of plants popping up in your yard that aren't your one favored variety of grass. You will be buying herbicides for the rest of your life, and it will get worse, not better, because willy-nilly use of herbicides is leading to plants developing herbicide resistance faster than we can come up with new herbicides.
@kidpixdeluxe-4
From my limited knowledge of ecology, "but this is what natives have been saying for YEARS" basically sums up literally all work that has been done with ecology in north america
do yall fw gyaru girls in zombie apocalypse situations
celestia is such a funny character like she's constantly manipulating twilight and friends to do shit instead of just asking and you could arguably frame that as being bc she's a "god" and pushing fate to her design or whatever, except that she engages with the group like a normal and relatable person, which makes it more like villainous machinations, except 90% of this manipulation goes towards things like "I don't want my party to be boring shit again. put my little country girl blorbos in there with zero prep so they fuck it up bad"
you think you've fucked anything up around princess celestia and she's like heh. no worries. all according to keikaku
Celestia instantly makes more sense as a character when you ignore the princess stuff and remember that she's a 1000+ years old wizard. Of course she does manipulative trickster stuff to teach moral lessons and/or cause chaos to amuse herself, that's classic wizard behavior. Of course sometimes she's actually socially awkward and bad at personal relationships and has bad ideas that she thought were good that result in her eating shit embarrassing style, that's classic wizard behavior. Of course she lets the aristocrats and nobles run around being assholes she's still running on wizard advisor programming, she's basically trying to merlin the entire upper class of equestria instead of just a king and some knights. "Yeah uuhhh we'll release the incarnation of chaos himself from his ancient prison because we think this shy girl can be friends with him", terrible plan if you're thinking like a ruler, amazing plan if you're thinking like a wizard. Just look at Canterlot 'Castle' for five seconds and ask yourself if that's in any way a castle. No. Wizard tower, yes. Wizard.
You are so right actually
The beautiful art of Thomas Blackshear II
i went to his website and saw even more great art! sharing some more which i particularly appreciated
Rain over block 9
color in the backrooms
so i saw the backrooms yesterday and i spent a couple hours today weeding my garden and chewing over all the bits and one thing i can't get over is when, SPOILERS: clark sticks a carving knife into one of the effigies and says to his therapist, 'can you imagine how good that feels? not to feel anything? not to hurt?'
like yeah man i can imagine. i can imagine how you're a black man in the early-mid 90s and you didn't make it as an architect (how many black men were in your graduating class? how many were in the board rooms of all those firms you didn't get to join?) and you didn't make it as a small business owner (maybe it's not your race, not everything is about race, you can't make it all about race all the time) and you dress so very business casual (you're a businessman but you're casual) and talk so carefully (you're a good man, civilized, polite) and any time you raise your voice everyone around you flinches away and you've been drinking all this time just to get by, just to wind down, just to stay numb, except you're not getting by.
except you got nothing. you wound down. you're hitting bottom.
you paid for a wife and a house and didn't get to keep them. you humiliate yourself doing minstrel shit for a tv commercial and it all just shatters. your whole life has been that broken fucking glass you dropped. getting dropped on your ass by your own fucking chairs, this cheap pasteboard furniture you can't even sell. santa clara! you thought california would be different. you got a rust belt accent that bleeds through when you're not careful (new york? chicago? philly?) and you thought maybe in california it would be better but what the fuck do you have to show for any of your dreams. a guy like you doesn't get dreams, he gets crap. he gets glass shards and broken legs. a guy like you. a guy like you.
what's the matter with a guy like you? why did you get born this way? wired this way? some guys get california sunshine and you get broken glass. you wanted to be an architect! you wanted to build the world. but the world isn't for guys like you, pasteboard guys (black guys) wired wrong (angry. sad. angry.) the world isn't for guys like you to build.
not the world up there. out there. beyond you. but down here... with what's left. when you're left with what's left.
when you push that knife into some big fat white guy's neck (a fat man, you picked a fat man--but you're not fat, even with the drinking, even with the desk job, you took care of yourself, you took pride in yourself) you push your knife into a guy's neck, and there's nothing. he doesn't care.
god, wouldn't that feel good? all your life you've had that knife pushed into you. one inch, ten inch, a little cut here, a little cut there, one in your neck, one in your heart, one in your balls. one through your spine. life is an endless series of knives, pushed in slow.
god, wouldn't it feel good if that didn't hurt.
Phm doodle requests from twt