Why Zino Fascism?
Rabbi speaking out about Jewish silence on the evil Zionist regime of Israel.
wallacepolsom

@theartofmadeline

JVL
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
h
No title available
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Sweet Seals For You, Always

izzy's playlists!
d e v o n
Not today Justin
Stranger Things

titsay
almost home

Discoholic 🪩

Product Placement
we're not kids anymore.
noise dept.
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
No title available

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Russia
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
@nondelusionalcat
Why Zino Fascism?
Rabbi speaking out about Jewish silence on the evil Zionist regime of Israel.
In this clip, British novelist Martin Amis talks about the dishonesty of choosing ‘gut instinct’ over the ‘brain.’ . ‘Choosing instinct’ is
Three-quarters of all children born in or admitted to Bessborough in 1943 died in infancy
Irish homes for unwed mothers and babies
Evil perpetrated by fanatical religious people is especially dangerous because they believe (without objective evidence) that their actions are exclusively sanctioned by God. When someone believes their actions are divinely ordained and have institutional support, they are able to repress empathy, morals, and legal principles to commit the most egregious acts with diligence and self righteousness.
The same people who are so scrupulous about calls by referees and who squeal about any hint of cheating in sports are perfectly fine with their side cheating in elections and their elected representatives self dealing while in office. They have zero integrity.
Documents released in an antitrust lawsuit show how some elite colleges gave well-connected applicants a leg up in admissions. Are these pra
Sadly things I’ve learned that are far from true:
America is a force for good.
Religion is a force for good.
Our elected representatives work for the people.
SCOTUS is wise and impartial.
The justice system is fair.
The news media doesn’t have an agenda and cares about the whole truth.
Americans believe that bigotry is bad.
Americans believe in science and historical accuracy.
Americans believe that cheating in elections is wrong. (They do however have a consensus that cheating in sports is unacceptable.)
America is a meritocracy.
Freedom of speech is respected in America.
Genocide is unacceptable.
The Post’s year-long investigation found that three times as many Native American students had died at boarding schools between 1828 and 197
Who are Trump supporters?
From the book, “authoritarian nightmare, Trump and his followers”, written by John Dean, former White House Counsel for Richard Nixon, and psychologist Dr. John Altemeyer, a researcher and expert on authoritarianism.
We know a lot about authoritarian followers, but unfortunately most of what we know indicates it will be almost impossible to change their minds. Here are some things established by experiments. See if you recognize any of these behaviors in Trump supporters. Compared with most people:
They are highly ethnocentric, highly inclined to see the world as their in-group versus everyone else. Because they are so committed to their in-group, they are very zealous in its cause. They will trust their leaders no matter what they say, and distrust whomever the leader says to distrust.
They are highly fearful of a dangerous world. Their parents taught them, more than parents usually do, that the world is dangerous. They may also be genetically predisposed to experience stronger fear than people skilled at “keeping their heads while others are losing theirs.”
They are highly self-righteous. They believe they are the “good people” and this unlocks a lot of hostile impulses against those they consider bad.
They are aggressive. Given the chance to attack someone with the approval of an authority, they will lower the boom.
They are highly prejudiced against racial and ethnic minorities, non-heterosexuals, and women in general.
They will support their authorities, and even help them, persecute almost any identifiable group in the country.
Their beliefs are a mass of contradictions. They have highly compartmentalized minds, in which opposite beliefs live independent lives in separate boxes. As a result, their thinking is full of double-standards.
They reason poorly. If they like the conclusion of an argument, they don’t pay much attention to whether the evidence is valid or the argument is consistent. They especially have trouble realizing a conclusion is invalid.
They are highly dogmatic. Because they have mainly gotten their beliefs from the authorities in their lives, rather than think things out for themselves, they have no real defense when facts or events indicate they are wrong. So they just dig in their heels and refuse to change.
They are very dependent on social reinforcement of their beliefs. They think they are right because almost everyone they know and listen to tells them they are. That happens because they screen out sources that will suggest that they are wrong.
Because they severely limit their exposure to different people and ideas, they vastly overestimate the extent to which other people agree with them. And thinking they are “the moral majority” supports their attacks on the “evil minorities” they see in the country.
They believe strongly in group cohesiveness, and being loyal. They are highly energized when surrounded by a crowd of fellow-believers because it makes them feel powerful and supports their belief that “all the good people” agree with them.
They are easily duped by manipulators who pretend to espouse their causes when all the con-artists really want is personal gain.
They are largely blind to themselves. They have little self-understanding and insight into why they think and do what they do. They are heavily into denial.
I hasten to add that studies find examples of all these things in lots of others, not just authoritarian followers. But not as consistently, and not nearly as much.
If you are the kind of person who would NOT make a good authoritarian follower, you will be wondering “What’s the evidence?” for all these assertions. The scientific evidence, which has stood the test of time for decades now, is at your fingertips.
Voters in Arizona and Missouri and at least five other states will decide referendums on abortion rights this year, with potentially more to
Article discusses the latest states who will have abortion rights on the ballot this fall.
In this age of Christian nationalism it is well to remember that the notion that one’s religion (largely a coincidence of one’s birthplace) is the only correct way to live is not only delusional and egotistical, it compels its followers to spread and even force their beliefs on others. As history has repeatedly shown, great tragedies result when religious zealots meet opposition and feel justified in behaving immorally and even heinously when it is seen as an expedient means to a holy end.
Kids whose parents make $158,200 to $222,400 a year have the worst odds of Ivy League acceptance.
Basically it says the Ivy plus schools are looking to advantage kids from uber wealthy, but of course everyone knows that. It sure aint about merit! And they had the temerity to use affirmative action to ease their conscience. What ass-holes. But this policy has already caused themselves damage, especially in STEM, in which schools that accept more on merit have pulled ahead of the Ivies.
Trump's Final Days/ August 4, 2023
Best podcast on the sociopathic mind of trump and his followers.
Many of the top universities in the country use this preference in admissions.
More damning stats showing the unethical practices of elite schools catering to students who predominantly come from wealthy and white families.
A new study finds that although fewer than 1% of college students attend “Ivy-Plus” colleges, they account for 15% of those in the top 0.1%
Yup. The elite private colleges have been using affirmative action as a smokescreen to give themselves the illusion that they are noble and advocating for diversity and the underprivileged. In fact, they have been carving out the lion’s share of spots for their own kind: predominantly white and wealthy. Even among the minorities that they accept, the majority come from privilege. This cynical strategy excludes the truly deserving and most qualified students, many of whom are Asian Americans, but it is finally collapsing under scrutiny and its own hypocrisy. Shame on them. Getting rid of affirmative action for the wealthy would as the study suggests allow the best qualified and most needy students to be admitted regardless of race and would naturally increase diversity.